scholarly journals Soil Densification Due to Static Sand Pile Installation for Liquefaction Remediation

2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimichi Tsukamoto ◽  
Kenji Ishihara ◽  
Minoru Yamamoto ◽  
Kenji Harada ◽  
Hiroshi Yabe
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-29
Author(s):  
Ahmad Jabber Hussain ◽  
Alaa Dawood Salman ◽  
. Nazar Hassan Mohammad

      According to this theoretical study which was about loading of piles under different condition of loading (compression and up-lift forces ) and for deferent pile installation (vertical and inclined pile ) by which it called (positive batter pile ) when the inclination of the load and pile is in the same direction and called (negative batter pile) when the inclination of load is opposite to the pile inclination, and from studying these cases the results of analysis can be summarize in the flowing points: 1-Variation of load inclination on piles effects on the bearing capacity and uplift resistance. It was found that bearing capacity of the piles increase with increasing of load inclination up to the inclination angle (37.5ͦ) which represents the maximum bearing capacity and then the bearing capacity decrease with increasing of load inclination. 2- Variation of batter pile affects the bearing capacity of the pile and up-lift resistance. by which equivalent angle will be used as result between the load and piles inclination and this angle will be used in calculation of piles resistance . 3- It was noticed the shape of soil failure is highly affected by the inclination of pile. The shape of failure for the soil which is in contact with pile and this include (vertical and batter piles) is highly affected by the angle of inclination.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hang Zhou ◽  
Hanlong Liu ◽  
Mark F. Randolph ◽  
Gangqiang Kong ◽  
Zhaohu Cao

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. F. Atman ◽  
P. Brunet ◽  
J. Geng ◽  
G. Reydellet ◽  
P. Claudin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kevin N. Flynn ◽  
Bryan A. McCabe

Driven cast-in-situ (DCIS) piles are classified as large displacement piles. However, the use of an oversized driving shoe introduces additional complexities influencing shaft resistance mobilisation, over and above those applicable to preformed displacement piles. Therefore, several design codes restrict the magnitude of shaft resistance in DCIS pile design. In this paper, a series of dynamic load tests was performed on the temporary steel driving tubes during DCIS pile installation at three UK sites. The instrumented piles were subsequently subjected to maintained compression load tests to failure. The mobilised shear stresses inferred from the dynamic tests during driving were two to five times smaller than those on the as-constructed piles during maintained load testing. This was attributed to soil loosening along the tube shaft arising from the oversized base shoe. Nevertheless, the radial stress reductions appear to be reversible by the freshly-cast concrete fluid pressures which provide lower-bound estimates of radial total stress inferred from the measured shear stresses during static loading. This recovery in shaft resistance is not recognised in some European design practices, resulting in conservative design lengths. Whilst the shaft resistance of DCIS piles was underpredicted by the dynamic load tests, reasonable estimates of base resistance were obtained.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document