scholarly journals Vedenjske naloge teorije uma: priročnik in naloge

Author(s):  
Tiffany L. Hutchins ◽  
Patricia A. Prelock ◽  
Nika Knez ◽  
Maša Vidmar
Keyword(s):  

Slovenska različica Vedenjskih nalog teorije uma je prevedena in prirejena iz angleške različice – The Theory of Mind Task Battery (ToMTB), katere avtorici sta Hutchins in Prelock (2010, 2014) in se lahko uporablja vzporedno z Vprašalnikom teorije uma (The Theory of Mind Inventory-2), ki je prav tako preveden in prirejen na slovensko populacijo.

Psihologija ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agota Major ◽  
Fabia Franco ◽  
Marija Zotovic

This study aims to investigate the effect of theory of mind, age and mother tongue on the implicit causality effect in preschoolers from two different language backgrounds. Serbian and Hungarian native speakers aged 3-7 years participated in the study. After taking part in a Theory of Mind task, children were presented verbs in simple 'Subject verb Object' sentences describing interactions between two participants, with the interactions being based on emotional, mental or visual experiences. Children were asked 'Why does S verb O?' and their responses were categorized as containing an inference about the sentence-S or the sentence-O. The results show that Theory of Mind is a significant factor in the emergence of implicit causality, with age of participants and mother tongue being also contributing to explaining patterns of implicit causality.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. P. Bozikas ◽  
M. Giannakou ◽  
M. H. Kosmidis ◽  
P. Kargopoulos ◽  
G. Kioseoglou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradford H. Pillow
Keyword(s):  

NeuroImage ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. S251 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.C. Fletcher ◽  
F. Happé ◽  
S Ehlers ◽  
C Gillberg ◽  
R.J. Dolan ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. S508
Author(s):  
J. Son ◽  
S.I. Lee ◽  
C.J. Shin ◽  
S.K. Kim ◽  
I.K. Oh ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 124-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara T. Baker ◽  
Alan M. Leslie ◽  
C.R. Gallistel ◽  
Bruce M. Hood

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (7) ◽  
pp. E1684-E1689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branden J. Bio ◽  
Taylor W. Webb ◽  
Michael S. A. Graziano

Many people show a left-right bias in visual processing. We measured spatial bias in neurotypical participants using a variant of the line bisection task. In the same participants, we measured performance in a social cognition task. This theory-of-mind task measured whether each participant had a processing-speed bias toward the right of, or left of, a cartoon agent about which the participant was thinking. Crucially, the cartoon was rotated such that what was left and right with respect to the cartoon was up and down with respect to the participant. Thus, a person’s own left-right bias could not align directly onto left and right with respect to the cartoon head. Performance on the two tasks was significantly correlated. People who had a natural bias toward processing their own left side of space were quicker to process how the cartoon might think about objects to the left side of its face, and likewise for a rightward bias. One possible interpretation of these results is that the act of processing one’s own personal space shares some of the same underlying mechanisms as the social cognitive act of reconstructing someone else’s processing of their space.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document