scholarly journals Integration of Intraoral Scanner-based Mandibular Movement Data for An Anterior Single-implant Restoration

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 212-218
Author(s):  
Hyunho Lee ◽  
Kyung Chul Oh ◽  
Jae-Hoon Lee
2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
Hyeon Kang ◽  
Nu-Ri Seo ◽  
Sang-Won Park ◽  
Hyun-Pil Lim ◽  
Kwi-Dug Yun ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 44-49
Author(s):  
R. V. Studenikin ◽  
A. A. Mamedov

The effect of discrepancies between digital scans and conventional impressions on the clinical performance of a permanent restoration has not been fully understood.Thirty patients received conventional impressions and digital scans of a single implant restoration. Two crowns were made for the same implant using both methods. The time taken for each procedure was recorded. After analyzing the accuracy and effectiveness of both crowns, the best one was placed. A questionnaire was conducted to assess the preferences and comfort when using crowns made by one method or another.The total time for the traditional impression technique was 15 minutes, while the time for the digital scanning technique was significantly less – 10 minutes.The preparation time, including the disinfection of the silicone impressions, their transportation to the laboratory, the casting of the impressions, the hardening of the plaster, as well as the preparation of the model by the technician, was 4 hours for conventional impressions.The timing for sending the STL file and modeling the structure was less than 2 hours for the digital scan method. The production time of crowns takes 3 hours for both conventional impressions and digital ones.Of all crowns selected for placement, 46.7% were made from conventional impressions and 53.3% from digital scans. Participants preferred the digital scanning technique (89%) over the traditional impression-taking technique (11%).The data from this study suggest that digital scanning and CAD/CAM technology may be more effective and better accepted by study par-ticipants for a single implant restoration than conventional impressions and plaster casts.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Chul Oh ◽  
Jee-Hwan Kim ◽  
Chang-Woo Woo ◽  
Hong Seok Moon

Limited evidence is available comparing the differences between pre-operative and post-operative 3D implant positions from the viewpoint of prosthetics. We aimed to investigate the differences between preplanned positions of virtual provisional restorations and their actual positions following fully guided single-implant placement. Ten maxillary typodonts with missing right central incisors were imaged using cone-beam computed tomography, and digital impressions were obtained using an intraoral scanner. These data were imported into implant-planning software, following which the provisional restorations were designed. After data superimposition, an appropriate implant position was determined, and a computer-assisted implant surgical guide was designed for each typodont. Orders generated from the implant-planning software were imported into relevant computer-aided design software to design the custom abutments. The abutments, provisional restorations, and surgical guides were fabricated, and each restoration was cemented to the corresponding abutments, generating a screw-type immediate provisional restoration. The implants were placed using the surgical guides, and the screw-type provisional restorations were engaged to the implants. The typodonts were then rescanned using the intraoral scanner. The restorations designed at the treatment planning stage were compared with those in the post-operative scan using metrology software. The angular deviation around the central axis of the implant was measured, and the differences in the crown position were converted to root mean square (RMS) values. The post-operative provisional restorations exhibited an absolute angular deviation of 6.94 ± 5.78° and an RMS value of 85.8 ± 20.2 µm when compared with their positions in the pre-operative stage. Within the limitations of the present in vitro study, the results highlight the potential application of customized prefabricated immediate provisional restorations after single-implant placement.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 326-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiharu Imakita ◽  
Makoto Shiota ◽  
Yoko Yamaguchi ◽  
Shohei Kasugai ◽  
Noriyuki Wakabayashi

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-99
Author(s):  
Adrien Pollini ◽  
Dean Morton ◽  
Sirikarn P. Arunyanak ◽  
Bryan T. Harris ◽  
Wei-Shao Lin

1976 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 510-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. McCoy ◽  
Edwin F. Shryoek ◽  
Harry C. Lundeen

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-294
Author(s):  
Tuncer Burak Özçelik ◽  
Burak Yılmaz

Abstract The best possible fit of prosthetic components should be the aim of the clinician. The technical report presented here describes the use of a modified plastic shell technique for modeling a cement-retained single-implant restoration. This approach will help to prevent potential errors caused by the wax modeling technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document