scholarly journals One Case of Esophageal Obstruction Caused by Enteral Nutrition

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangzhong Wang ◽  
Xiuqing Liao ◽  
Xiaoli Bao ◽  
Xianlin Peng ◽  
Nan Tang

We report a case of complete esophageal obstruction caused by continuous enteral nutrition infusion via nasogastric tube. A 77 year old man received mechanical ventilation due to severe pneumonia and severe respiratory distress. He began using enteral nutrition emulsion (TPF) through a nasogastric tube on admission. 15 days later, due to the difficulty of re-inserting the nasogastric tube, endoscopy found a large number of coagulations in the esophagus, resulting in complete esophageal obstruction. We remove a small part of the foreign body with a net basket under gastroscope. After the operation, the nasogastric tube was placed in the middle of the esophagus again, which was perfused with 5% sodium bicarbonate and vinegar through the gastric tube. One week later, the esophagus was completely unobstructed by gastroscopy. A conclusion can be drawn that the precipitation and coagulation of TPF can lead to the whole esophageal obstruction. Endoscopic removal of foreign bodies, sodium bicarbonate and vinegar retention in the esophagus can treat the food obstruction caused by TPF.

Open Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 426-430
Author(s):  
Wu Ge ◽  
Wu Wei ◽  
Pan Shuang ◽  
Zheng Yan-Xia ◽  
Lv Ling

AbstractObjectiveTo assess the effects of two different nutritional mode on the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients on mechanical ventilation.Methods70 patients admitted to the ICU and under mechanical ventilation, were randomly divided into the nasointestinal tube group and nasogastric tube group. Patients from both groups received enteral nutrition, using the same nutritional agent, through intubation. The duration of stay in the ICU, duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of VAP, nutritional state, and survival of the intestinal tract were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe duration of stay in the ICU, duration of mechanical ventilation and incidence of VAP in the nasointestinal tube group was lower than that in the nasogastric tube group (P<0.05). There was an increase in the levels of prealbumin and transferrin in the nasointestinal tube group (P<0.05). However, there were no obvious difference in the nasogastric tube group (P<0.05). The incidence of abdominal distension, diarrhea, regurgitation, aspiration, and hyperglycemia in the nasointestinal tube group was much lower than that in the nasogastric tube group (P < 0.05).ConclusionThis study showed that enteral nutrition delivery using a nasointestinal way can effectively reduce the incidence of VAP and improve the nutritional status of patients under mechanical ventilation.


1993 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Bertoni ◽  
Dario Pacchione ◽  
Romano Sassatelli ◽  
Enrico Ricci ◽  
Maria G. Mortilla ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Banks ◽  
William P. Potsic

The well-known tendency for children to place loose objects in their months not infrequently leads to the entrapment of foreign bodies in the aerodigestive tract. With prompt and adequate removal few complications occur. However, when the foreign body goes undetected or is neglected the patient may develop dysphagia, pneumonia, failure to thrive, lung or mediastinal abscesses, bronchopulmonary or bronchoesophageal fistulas, or erosion of major vessels. Fifteen cases of retained foreign bodies were identified in a chart review between 1971 and 1977 at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, calling attention to the problems of aerodigestive foreign bodies of prolonged duration. Early and late complications are discussed and early diagnosis and endoscopic removal emphasized.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. S61
Author(s):  
M. Ramirez ◽  
K. Papapietro ◽  
D. Adjemian ◽  
S. Wigodski ◽  
C. Romero

Author(s):  
Renat R. Gubaidullin ◽  
◽  
Aleksandr P. Kuzin ◽  
Vladimir V. Kulakov ◽  
◽  
...  

ntroduction. The COVID-19 pandemic caused an outbreak of viral lung infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome complicated with acute respiratory failure. Despite the fact that the pandemic has a lengthened run, none of the therapeutic approaches have proved to be sufficiently effective according to the evidence-based criteria. We consider the use of surfactant therapy in patients with severe viral pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) as one of the possible methods for treating COVID-19 related pneumonia. Objective. To prove the clinical efficacy and safety of orally inhaled Surfactant-BL, an authorized drug, in the combination therapy of COVID-19 related ARDS. Materials and methods. A total of 38 patients with COVID-19 related severe pneumonia and ARDS were enrolled in the study. Of these, 20 patients received the standard therapy in accordance with the temporary guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of the novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, version 9. And 18 patients received the surfactant therapy in addition to the standard therapy. Surfactant-BL was used in accordance with the instructions on how to administer the drug for the indication – prevention of the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome. A step-by-step approach to the build-up of the respiratory therapy aggressiveness was used to manage hypoxia. We used oxygen inhalation via a face mask with an oxygen inflow of 5–15 l/min, highflow oxygen therapy via nasal cannulas using Airvo 2 devices, non-invasive lung ventilation, invasive lung ventilation in accordance with the principles of protective mechanical ventilation. Results and discussion. Significant differences in the frequency of transfers to mechanical ventilation, mortality, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and hospitalization length of stay (p <0.05) were found between the groups. Patients receiving surfactant therapy who required a transfer to mechanical ventilation accounted for 22% of cases, and the mortality rate was 16%. In the group of patients receiving standard therapy without surfactant inhalation 45% were transferred to mechanical ventilation, and 35% died. For patients receiving surfactant therapy, the hospital stay was reduced by 20% on average, and ICU stay by 30%. Conclusion. The inclusion of surfactant therapy in the treatment of COVID-19 related severe pneumonia and ARDS can reduce the progression of respiratory failure, avoid the use of mechanical ventilation, shorten the ICU and hospitalization length of stay, and improve the survival rate of this patient cohort.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji JL Limpias Kamiya ◽  
Naoki Hosoe ◽  
Kaoru Takabayashi ◽  
Yukie Hayashi ◽  
Xi Sun ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document