L'istituzionalizzazione di nuove forme organizzative - dalle organizzazioni alle reti d'azione

2012 ◽  
pp. 103-116
Author(s):  
Francesco Miele
Keyword(s):  
New Institutionalism ◽  
Organizational Form ◽  
Organizational Networks ◽  
Organizational Studies ◽  
London School ◽  
Organizational Forms ◽  
Main Current ◽  
New Organizational Forms ◽  
London School Of Economics

In the last years, organizational studies have developed a growing interest about institutionalization processes of new organizational forms, in order to understand the ways trough which innovative organizations, inter-organizational networks or organizing processes become stable and legitimized. The aim of this paper is to underline the potentialities of the action-nets approach (Czarniawska, 2004) in the study of institutionalization processes of innovative organizing forms. Firstly, the article focuses on the concept of action-nets, reporting two studies (Odds, 2005; Czarniawska, 2009) which have reconstructed the institutionalization processes of the same organizational form: The London School of Economics. Secondly, it underlines the innovations brought by action-nets approach in front of new institutionalism, the main current of studies that has contributed to understand the institutionalization's dynamics of new organizational forms. Finally, it concerns the development perspectives of action-nets, suggesting some useful directions to refine the theoretical and conceptual tools of this approach.

scholarly journals Emergence of new organizational forms: An exploratory study in selective collection cooperatives

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Ana Carolina Simões Braga ◽  
Dimária Silva Meirelles
Keyword(s):  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Organizational Form ◽  
Formal Structure ◽  
Organizational Forms ◽  
New Organizational Forms ◽  
Selective Collection

For Organizational Ecologythe adventof anew populationismarked bya range ofindefinitions,as the parametersofan organizational form. Thepurpose of this studyis bothto identifythe key featuresof theorganizational formof selective collection cooperatives, astheir establishment. The methodologyadoptedisexploratory research.The result of theanalysis showedthepresence ofvarious forms ofselective collection cooperatives, definedby theresource niches, which definethe formal structure(blueprint) of the organization. Identified also thenon-uniformitybetween thepolitical legitimacyandsocial legitimacydrivingforthe no establishmentof this neworganizational form.

Tools for the development of innovative entrepreneurship in the region

2019 ◽  
pp. 66-72
Author(s):  
V. P. Basenko ◽  
V. A. Dianova
Keyword(s):  
New Technologies ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Organizational Forms ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Economic Agents ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
New Organizational Forms ◽  
Innovative Solution ◽  
Public And Private Cooperation ◽  
Effective Use

The article is devoted to the problems of innovative enterprise development. Since the Russian economy is in a state of financial and economic stagnation, there is a need to apply radically new innovative directions of business activities that ensure the effective use of financial potential within the framework of national projects. Practice shows that today the business sector in Russia is not able to provide a full-fledged demand for new technologies. Therefore, there is a need for substantial state support to provide centralized orders for high-tech industries. There are already examples of combining the efforts of a number of Autonomous economic entities to implement innovative reforms, new organizational forms of interaction have been formed, such as: centers for the implementation of innovative ideas; centers for engineering services; business incubators, etc. The subjects of these organizational forms of cooperation developed and proposed measures aimed at innovative solution of technological problems relevant to the regional economy, as well as for the country as a whole. Link for the efficient interaction of economic agents becomes an inherent characteristic, is the need of implementation of mechanisms of coordination with “network interaction”. It is important to note the fact that the existing relations and forms of regulation of various systems are not permanent, there are no strategic concepts aimed at long-term public and private cooperation.

Interest Groups and Elections

2019 ◽  
pp. 339-357
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Berry
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Interest Groups ◽  
Campaign Finance ◽  
Organizational Forms ◽  
Super Pacs ◽  
New Organizational Forms ◽  
Winner Take All ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Take All

The relationships between interest groups, political parties, and elections have always been dynamic, but in recent years change has accelerated in ways that have favored some interests over others. This chapter considers these developments as the result of a variety of factors, the most critical of which are the growth of polarization, a new legal landscape for campaign finance, and new organizational forms. The chapter goes on to suggest, that as bipartisanship has ebbed, elections have become winner-take-all affairs and interest groups are pushed to choose sides. The chapter further suggests that the rise of super PACs is especially notable as wealthy individuals have become increasingly important, single sources of campaign money, supplanting in part traditional interest groups, especially conventional PACs. It concludes that even as sums spent by super PACs and other interest groups have skyrocketed, the impact of their direct spending on persuading voters remains uncertain.

The Judiciary, International and National, and the Development of International Law

1996 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Y. Jennings
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Justice ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
London School ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
Legal Adviser ◽  
Foreign Office ◽  
London School Of Economics ◽  
Law Reports

TheAnnual Digest of Public International Law Cases—the ancestor of theInternational Law Reports—was first published “under the direction” of the Department of International Studies of the London School of Economics. The “chief inspirers”, to use Fitzmaurice's phrase, were Arnold McNair and Hersch Lauterpacht, the latter then on the teaching staff of the School. There was also an Advisory Committee of Sir Cecil J. B. Hurst, a former President of the Permanent Court of International Justice and later Legal Adviser to the Foreign Office; W. E. Beckett, also of the Foreign Office; A. Hammarksjöld, the Registrar of the Permanent Court of International Justice, and Sir John Fischer Williams of Oxford and the Reparation Commission.

scholarly journals Strategizing in a digital world: Overcoming cognitive barriers, reconfiguring routines and introducing new organizational forms

2021 ◽  
pp. 102110
Author(s):  
Henk W. Volberda ◽  
Saeed Khanagha ◽  
Charles Baden-Fuller ◽  
Oli R. Mihalache ◽  
Julian Birkinshaw
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Forms ◽  
Digital World ◽  
New Organizational Forms
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document