scholarly journals Dress Nicer = Know More? Young Children’s Knowledge Attribution and Selective Learning Based on How Others Dress

Author(s):  
Lili Ma ◽  
Kyla P. McDonald

This research explored whether children judge the knowledge state of others and selectively learn novel information from them based on how they dress. The results indicated that 4- and 6-year-olds identified a formally dressed individual as more knowledgeable about new things in general than a casually dressed one (Study 1). Moreover, children displayed an overall preference to seek help from a formally dressed individual rather than a casually dressed one when learning about novel objects and animals (Study 2). These findings are discussed in relation to the halo effect, and may have important implications for child educators regarding how instructor dress might influence young students’ knowledge attribution and learning preferences.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Ma ◽  
Kyla P. McDonald

This research explored whether children judge the knowledge state of others and selectively learn novel information from them based on how they dress. The results indicated that 4- and 6-year-olds identified a formally dressed individual as more knowledgeable about new things in general than a casually dressed one (Study 1). Moreover, children displayed an overall preference to seek help from a formally dressed individual rather than a casually dressed one when learning about novel objects and animals (Study 2). These findings are discussed in relation to the halo effect, and may have important implications for child educators regarding how instructor dress might influence young students’ knowledge attribution and learning preferences.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah F V Eiteljoerge ◽  
Maurits Adam ◽  
Birgit Elsner ◽  
Nivedita Mani

Children live in a multimodal world: For example, communication with young children not only includes information from the auditory linguistic modality in the form of speech but also from the visual modality in the form of actions that caregivers use in the interaction with children. Dynamic systems approaches suggest that multimodal input can help children to learn from the environment while also allowing the child to shape their own learning experience through selective attention. This selective attention might be influenced by the child's preferences, which, in turn, might shape the child's learning behaviour. In this study, we investigated how children's selective attention to information from the linguistic or the action modality influence learning in both domains.Two- to 3-year-old children and adults participated in a novel gaze-contingent paradigm that allowed them to choose between being provided with the labels for or the actions that one can do with novel and familiar objects. At test, participants saw the two novel objects and either heard one of the labels or saw one of the actions that had been performed on one of the objects. Following label and action presentation, we investigated whether children fixated the target object, i.e., the object whose respective action/label had been presented, as an index of word and action learning. Children learned word but not action-object associations, and their target looking in the word-object condition was influenced by their selective attention to words in the earlier phase. Adults learned word-object associations and action-object associations, and their target looking in the action-object condition was influenced by their selective attention to actions in the earlier phase.Gaze-contingent eye-tracking paradigms provide us a unique method to analyse children's active learning preferences, which will help us better understand children's learning behaviour in a complex world. In particular, we show that in multimodal environments, children's preferences might help to structure the complex input into chunks that are compatible with the child's cognitive capacities in the moment.


1994 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Povinelli ◽  
Alyssa B. Rulf ◽  
Donna T. Bierschwale

Author(s):  
Roberto D. Hernández

This article addresses the meaning and significance of the “world revolution of 1968,” as well as the historiography of 1968. I critically interrogate how the production of a narrative about 1968 and the creation of ethnic studies, despite its world-historic significance, has tended to perpetuate a limiting, essentialized and static notion of “the student” as the primary actor and an inherent agent of change. Although students did play an enormous role in the events leading up to, through, and after 1968 in various parts of the world—and I in no way wish to diminish this fact—this article nonetheless argues that the now hegemonic narrative of a student-led revolt has also had a number of negative consequences, two of which will be the focus here. One problem is that the generation-driven models that situate 1968 as a revolt of the young students versus a presumably older generation, embodied by both their parents and the dominant institutions of the time, are in effect a sociosymbolic reproduction of modernity/coloniality’s logic or driving impulse and obsession with newness. Hence an a priori valuation is assigned to the new, embodied in this case by the student, at the expense of the presumably outmoded old. Secondly, this apparent essentializing of “the student” has entrapped ethnic studies scholars, and many of the period’s activists (some of whom had been students themselves), into said logic, thereby risking the foreclosure of a politics beyond (re)enchantment or even obsession with newness yet again.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document