Annual health checks for people with intellectual disabilities reduce preventable emergency admissions

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
BMJ ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 345 (nov15 1) ◽  
pp. e7589-e7589 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hoghton ◽  
G. Martin ◽  
U. Chauhan

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S159-S159
Author(s):  
N. O’Kane ◽  
I. Hall

BackgroundIn May 2015, NICE published guidelines for people with intellectual disabilities whose behavior challenges (NG11). Eight quality standards were subsequently developed by NICE to help service providers, health and social care practitioners and commissioners implement the necessary recommendations within the new NG11 guidelines.MethodsWe used a Quality Improvement (QI) methodology including process mapping, driver diagrams, and fortnightly QI team meetings. We conducted a baseline audit of the quality standards and used Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to pilot interventions generated by the team to improve compliance with the standards.ResultsBaseline compliance with the quality standards was low. We identified four priority areas for intervention: annual physical health checks, recording the indication of medication, multidisciplinary case discussion and concurrent psychosocial interventions for those prescribed medications for challenging behavior. Using a PDSA cycle for each intervention, we have demonstrated improved compliance with the NG11 guidelines. Compliance for the recording of indication of medication for all case reviews was previously 0% and now 100%. At least one target case is discussed at each MDT team meeting. Full results for annual health checks are awaited, but intervention has already shown an improvement in the uptake from 40% to 70%. Staff and carers knowledge of psychosocial interventions for people with challenging behavior showed an improvement after training.ConclusionsQuality Improvement methodology was successful in improving adherence to NG11 guidelines. We are currently assessing whether this is leading to reductions in challenging behavior and improvements to people's well-being.


2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Walmsley

This project, conducted during 2010 by a researcher working with a self-advocacy group, investigated the implementation of Annual Health Checks (AHCs) for people with intellectual disabilities in Oxfordshire, where only 26.1 percent of AHCs were completed in 2009–10 (national average 41 percent). AHCs were introduced in England in 2008 as a response to findings that people with intellectual disabilities have significantly worse health care than other groups. GP practices are financially incentivized to offer AHCs. This study found that slow progress in implementing AHCs was attributable to: uncertainty over who was eligible; limited awareness in general practices about the legal duty to make ‘reasonable adjustments’ to facilitate access; limited awareness of AHCs and their potential benefits amongst carers and adults with intellectual disabilities; and in some cases scepticism that AHCs were either necessary or beneficial. The article also explores the benefits of undertaking this project in partnership with a self-advocacy group.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-243
Author(s):  
M. Panca ◽  
M. Buszewicz ◽  
A. Strydom ◽  
A. Hassiotis ◽  
C. A. Welch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document