scholarly journals Hip Abductor Muscle Weakness after Antegrade Nailing of Femoral Fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  

Nailing of femoral fractures is now considered as the standard line of management, although having many advantages, this technique carries some risks related to the technique, in this short review we will handle the issue of hip abductor muscle weakness after antegrade nailing of femoral fractures.

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 225-226
Author(s):  
Shavkat Kuchimov ◽  
N Ekin Akalan ◽  
Fatma Bastug ◽  
Duygu Dalgic ◽  
Kubra Bekdemir ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
KIM ALLISON ◽  
BILL VICENZINO ◽  
TIM V. WRIGLEY ◽  
ALISON GRIMALDI ◽  
PAUL W. HODGES ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuro Sasaji ◽  
Kiyoshi Horaguchi ◽  
Noboru Yamada ◽  
Kazuo Iwai

2020 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 109652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotaka Iijima ◽  
Ayanori Yorozu ◽  
Yusuke Suzuki ◽  
Ryo Eguchi ◽  
Tomoki Aoyama ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 003-007
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Khalifa ◽  
Mohammed Khaled ◽  
Ahmed S. El-Hawary ◽  
Ahmed M. Ahmed

AbstractProximal femoral fractures (PFFs) are considered one of the most frequent situations faced by orthopaedic surgeons. Many lines of management had been described. Although management of PFFs with cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) is now considered the gold standard with many mechanical and biological advantages, this technique may have some disadvantages such as residual peritrochanteric pain, limping, limited walking distance, and difficulty with stairs. These complications may be attributed to fracture malreduction with shortening, which may result in either malunion or nonunion and ultimately implant failure. The resultant proximal femoral shortening (PFS) with alteration of the proximal femoral mechanics may affect both the hip abductor function and the daily patient activities. The purpose of this short review is to discuss the assessment and secondary effects of PFS after treating femoral fractures with CMNs.


2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reed Ferber ◽  
Karen D. Kendall ◽  
Lindsay Farr

Abstract Context: Very few authors have investigated the relationship between hip-abductor muscle strength and frontal-plane knee mechanics during running. Objective: To investigate this relationship using a 3-week hip-abductor muscle-strengthening program to identify changes in strength, pain, and biomechanics in runners with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Design: Cohort study. Setting: University-based clinical research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Fifteen individuals (5 men, 10 women) with PFPS and 10 individuals without PFPS (4 men, 6 women) participated. Intervention(s): The patients with PFPS completed a 3-week hip-abductor strengthening protocol; control participants did not. Main Outcome Measure(s): The dependent variables of interest were maximal isometric hip-abductor muscle strength, 2-dimensional peak knee genu valgum angle, and stride-to-stride knee-joint variability. All measures were recorded at baseline and 3 weeks later. Between-groups differences were compared using repeated-measures analyses of variance. Results: At baseline, the PFPS group exhibited reduced strength, no difference in peak genu valgum angle, and increased stride-to-stride knee-joint variability compared with the control group. After the 3-week protocol, the PFPS group demonstrated increased strength, less pain, no change in peak genu valgum angle, and reduced stride-to-stride knee-joint variability compared with baseline. Conclusions: A 3-week hip-abductor muscle-strengthening protocol was effective in increasing muscle strength and decreasing pain and stride-to-stride knee-joint variability in individuals with PFPS. However, concomitant changes in peak knee genu valgum angle were not observed.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e035413
Author(s):  
Petros Ismailidis ◽  
Peter Kvarda ◽  
Werner Vach ◽  
Christian Appenzeller-Herzog ◽  
Annegret Mündermann

IntroductionConservation of abductor muscle strength is directly associated with physical function after total hip replacement (THA). Although many studies have tried to explore and quantify a potential abductor muscle strength deficit after THA as well as identify possible causes and treatment options, this topic has not been addressed systematically.Methods and analysisHuman-based studies reporting measurements of hip abductor strength will be included in this review. Studies reporting on hip abductor strength measured manually or isometric measurements at an abduction angle other than 0° will not be considered. No restriction will be placed on study design, publication date operative approach, prosthesis design, age and sex of the patients or severity of OA. Data sources will be Embase via embase.com, Medline ALL via Ovid and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The preliminary search was conducted on 5 May 2019. Data regarding absolute values or torque ratio of hip abductor torque between sides as well as patient demographic data, surgical approaches and rehabilitation protocols will be extracted. The assessment of quality and risk of bias will be performed with the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The screening, data extraction and quality assessment will be performed by two reviewers independently. Where necessary, a third review author will make a final judgement. Narrative synthesis as well as tabular presentation of the extracted data will be included. Whenever possible, metaregression and subgroup specific meta-analyses will be used to investigate the influence of time since THA and type of measurement (isokinetic or isometric) on the different outcomes. In case of sufficient information, these analyses will be extended to include characteristics such as age, sex, surgical approach or rehabilitation programme.Ethics and disseminationNo ethics approval is required. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020153185.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document