scholarly journals EXAMINING INTERVENTION EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OUTCOMES IN SINGLE-CASE DESIGN STUDIES

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-171
Author(s):  
Julie Q. Morrison ◽  
Rebecca L. Rahschulte ◽  
Lauren McKinley ◽  
Allison M. Maxwell
Keyword(s):  
School Psychology ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Academic Intervention ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Single Case Design ◽  
Design Studies ◽  
Efficiency Measures ◽  
Effectiveness And Efficiency ◽  
Case Design

The research literature on evidence-based academic interventions focuses predominantly on measures of intervention effectiveness. Intervention efficiency measures, in contrast, include the dimension of time required to achieve a level of effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to review the research literature for single-case design studies that included measures of both effectiveness and efficiency for academic (i.e., reading, math, writing, and spelling) interventions in schools. The study reviewed single-case design research on academic interventions published in six dominant peer-reviewed journals in school psychology between 2003-2013: School Psychology Review, School Psychology Quarterly, Psychology in the Schools, Journal of School Psychology, Journal of Behavioral Education, and the Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools. The results of this study suggest that intervention efficiency measures are largely absent from the academic intervention research. The implications of this study are that both effectiveness and efficiency measures need to be considered as they each provide a unique contribution to determining the impact of an academic intervention. Key words: intervention efficiency, single-case designs.

scholarly journals Single-Case Research Design: An Alternative Strategy for Evidence-Based Practice

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drue Stapleton ◽  
Andrew Hawkins
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Pedagogical Practices ◽  
Single Subject ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Single Case Design ◽  
Proquest Dissertation ◽  
Case Design

Objective The trend of utilizing evidence-based practice (EBP) in athletic training is now requiring clinicians, researchers, educators, and students to be equipped to both engage in and make judgments about research evidence. Single-case design (SCD) research may provide an alternative approach to develop such skills and inform clinical and pedagogical practices. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature related to SCD and its potential contributions to EBP in athletic training. Data Source(s) We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Proquest Dissertation and Theses, and Google Scholar using terms “single case design”, “single subject design”, “within subjects”, and combined search terms of “single case design AND athletic training, AND allied health, AND medicine, AND nursing”. Data Synthesis Textual support for the use of SCD in athletic training and a brief review of literature pertaining to: general features, strengths, limitations, and design options commonly associated with the use of SCD. Conclusions Use of SCD in allied health professions is limited, with fewer studies in athletic training settings. Low awareness and misinterpretation of SCD may be contributing to the low use of SCD in athletic training research. The key characteristics of SCD make it appropriate for use in clinical and educational settings and may provide clinicians, educators, and researchers an alternative tool for the development of evidence necessary to engage in evidence-based practice.

Interventions Targeting Expressive Communication in Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1959-1978
Author(s):  
Kaitlyn P. Wilson ◽  
Jessica R. Steinbrenner ◽  
Tamar Kalandadze ◽  
Lara Handler
Keyword(s):  
Autism Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Single Case Design ◽  
Adults With Autism ◽  
Design Studies ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Expressive Communication ◽  
Case Design

PurposeThe aims of this systematic review are to (a) synthesize the literature on interventions targeting expressive communication in adults with autism spectrum disorder and (b) evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions.MethodThe literature search resulted in 7,196 articles. The research team used 2 reviewers and consensus for title/abstract review, full-text review, and quality review. To be included, studies had to (a) include at least 1 adult (18 years of age and above) with an autism spectrum disorder; (b) examine an intervention, treatment, or model of care; (c) provide outcome data related to expressive communication modalities/domains; (d) be experimental or quasi-experimental; and (e) be published in English. Twenty-two studies (14 single-case design and 8 group design), with a total of 256 participants and varied interventions and outcome variables, met criteria for inclusion. Effect sizes are presented for group design studies, and visual analysis results are outlined for single-case design studies.ResultsExamination of treatment effects in the included studies showed positive effects, overall; however, there was great variability between studies. Single-case design studies showed evidence of functional relations in all but 1 study, with most showing medium to large effects, as well as maintenance and generalization of gains. Group design studies showed a wide range of effects from near-zero to large effects. Differences in intervention strategies and durations, as well as in participant characteristics and outcome measures, presented barriers to aggregation.ConclusionsThis review highlights the need for increased high-quality research examining interventions targeting expressive communication in adults with autism spectrum disorder and also pinpoints interventions with potential for future study and use in this population.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders and Classroom-Based Interventions: Evidence-Based Status, Effectiveness, and Moderators of Effects in Single-Case Design Research

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith R. Harrison ◽  
Denise A. Soares ◽  
Stephen Rudzinski ◽  
Rachel Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Single Case Design ◽  
Exceptional Children ◽  
Students With Adhd ◽  
Case Design

Students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience symptoms of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity that often manifest as academic impairment. As such, teachers must select interventions to increase the probability of success for students with ADHD in their classes. Prior meta-analyses have evaluated school-based intervention effects; however, no systematic review meta-analysis has evaluated the effectiveness of interventions implemented in classrooms with students with ADHD. Additionally, classroom-based studies are frequently conducted through single-case design methodology, and recent advances in meta-analytic techniques provide the opportunity to explore intervention effectiveness as evaluated through quality research. Therefore, to inform selection of evidence-based interventions to be implemented in classroom settings, the current systematic review with meta-analysis of single-case design studies was conducted to evaluate intervention effectiveness, evidence-based status, and moderators of effects for four intervention types (behavioral, instructional, self-management, and environmental) when implemented with students with ADHD in classroom settings. The analysis included 27 articles published from 1971 to 2018. Overall and specific to each intervention type, the results indicate that classroom-based interventions for students with ADHD were moderately effective. Instructional and self-management interventions were deemed evidence based by What Works Clearinghouse standards and potentially evidence based by Council for Exceptional Children standards. Behavioral interventions were found to be potentially evidence based by Council for Exceptional Children criteria and were most effective when selected through functional behavior analysis and implemented by researchers in secondary settings. Instructional interventions were more effective when implemented in special education settings targeting academic outcomes. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

How effective are reading comprehension interventions for children with ASD? A meta-analysis of single-case design studies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-121
Author(s):  
Maryellen Brunson McClain ◽  
Cassity R. Haverkamp ◽  
Kandice J. Benallie ◽  
Sarah E. Schwartz ◽  
Vicki Simonsmeier
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Case Design ◽  
Design Studies ◽  
Children With Asd ◽  
Case Design
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document