Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders and Classroom-Based Interventions: Evidence-Based Status, Effectiveness, and Moderators of Effects in Single-Case Design Research

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith R. Harrison ◽  
Denise A. Soares ◽  
Stephen Rudzinski ◽  
Rachel Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Single Case Design ◽  
Exceptional Children ◽  
Students With Adhd ◽  
Case Design

Students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience symptoms of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity that often manifest as academic impairment. As such, teachers must select interventions to increase the probability of success for students with ADHD in their classes. Prior meta-analyses have evaluated school-based intervention effects; however, no systematic review meta-analysis has evaluated the effectiveness of interventions implemented in classrooms with students with ADHD. Additionally, classroom-based studies are frequently conducted through single-case design methodology, and recent advances in meta-analytic techniques provide the opportunity to explore intervention effectiveness as evaluated through quality research. Therefore, to inform selection of evidence-based interventions to be implemented in classroom settings, the current systematic review with meta-analysis of single-case design studies was conducted to evaluate intervention effectiveness, evidence-based status, and moderators of effects for four intervention types (behavioral, instructional, self-management, and environmental) when implemented with students with ADHD in classroom settings. The analysis included 27 articles published from 1971 to 2018. Overall and specific to each intervention type, the results indicate that classroom-based interventions for students with ADHD were moderately effective. Instructional and self-management interventions were deemed evidence based by What Works Clearinghouse standards and potentially evidence based by Council for Exceptional Children standards. Behavioral interventions were found to be potentially evidence based by Council for Exceptional Children criteria and were most effective when selected through functional behavior analysis and implemented by researchers in secondary settings. Instructional interventions were more effective when implemented in special education settings targeting academic outcomes. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Teaching academic skills to students with significant intellectual disabilities: A systematic review of the single-case design literature

2019 ◽  
pp. 174462951989538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen I Cannella-Malone ◽  
Scott A Dueker ◽  
Mary A Barczak ◽  
Matthew E Brock
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Visual Analysis ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Academic Skills ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Single Case Design ◽  
Significant Disabilities ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Basic Reading Skills ◽  
Case Design

Students with significant intellectual and developmental disabilities deserve access to instruction on academic skills in addition to functional skills. Many teachers, however, report challenges with identifying appropriate evidence-based practices to teach academics to these students. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize and analyze literature on academic instruction for students with significant disabilities. Two hundred twenty-two articles with 225 experiments utilizing a single-case design and published between 1976 and 2018 were included in the review. Visual analysis indicated that, in most cases, interventions enabled students to make progress on targeted academic skills. The majority of studies focused on basic reading skills and included participants with moderate disabilities. Most studies used a combination of three or four evidence-based practices, with modeling, prompting, visual supports, time delay, and reinforcement being the most frequently used combination across studies.

scholarly journals Single-Case Research Design: An Alternative Strategy for Evidence-Based Practice

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drue Stapleton ◽  
Andrew Hawkins
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Pedagogical Practices ◽  
Single Subject ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Single Case Design ◽  
Proquest Dissertation ◽  
Case Design

Objective The trend of utilizing evidence-based practice (EBP) in athletic training is now requiring clinicians, researchers, educators, and students to be equipped to both engage in and make judgments about research evidence. Single-case design (SCD) research may provide an alternative approach to develop such skills and inform clinical and pedagogical practices. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature related to SCD and its potential contributions to EBP in athletic training. Data Source(s) We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Proquest Dissertation and Theses, and Google Scholar using terms “single case design”, “single subject design”, “within subjects”, and combined search terms of “single case design AND athletic training, AND allied health, AND medicine, AND nursing”. Data Synthesis Textual support for the use of SCD in athletic training and a brief review of literature pertaining to: general features, strengths, limitations, and design options commonly associated with the use of SCD. Conclusions Use of SCD in allied health professions is limited, with fewer studies in athletic training settings. Low awareness and misinterpretation of SCD may be contributing to the low use of SCD in athletic training research. The key characteristics of SCD make it appropriate for use in clinical and educational settings and may provide clinicians, educators, and researchers an alternative tool for the development of evidence necessary to engage in evidence-based practice.

A Meta-Analysis of Educator Training to Improve Implementation of Interventions for Students With Disabilities

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew E. Brock ◽  
Erik W. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Performance Feedback ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Implementation Fidelity ◽  
Single Case Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Educator Training ◽  
Effective Training ◽  
Case Design

Teachers and paraprofessionals need effective training to improve their implementation of interventions for students with disabilities. Reviews of the single-case design literature have identified some features associated with effective training for these educators, but the group-design literature has received little attention. This meta-analysis systematically reviews group-design studies testing the efficacy of training to improve implementation of interventions for students with disabilities. The mean effect size of educator training on implementation fidelity was g = 1.08, and results from meta-regression analysis suggest training that involves a combination of two specific training strategies (i.e., modeling and performance feedback) was associated with improved implementation fidelity. Increased duration of training was not associated with larger effects. Considered alongside findings from the single-case design literature, these results suggest that how educators are trained is a more important consideration than the number of hours they spend in training.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document