scholarly journals Effect of Tantalum Addition on Crevice Corrosion of Super Duplex Stainless Steels

2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. 497-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Kawamori ◽  
Junichiro Kinugasa ◽  
Yosuke Yonenaga ◽  
Yuko Fukuta ◽  
Masaki Shimamoto ◽  
...  
CORROSION ◽  
10.5006/2185 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eirik B. Haugan ◽  
Monika Næss ◽  
Cristian Torres Rodriguez ◽  
Roy Johnsen ◽  
Mariano Iannuzzi

CORROSION ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 025004-1-025004-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Han ◽  
Y. Jiang ◽  
B. Deng ◽  
L. Zhang ◽  
J. Gao ◽  
...  

Abstract A simple and rapid electrochemical method for the evaluation of crevice corrosion in duplex stainless steels (DSS) is described. Three types of DSS—namely, UNS S32101, UNS S31803, and UNS S32750—were tested in 1 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl) solutions. Results showed good reproducibility with a typical standard deviation of below 3°C. The critical pitting temperature (CPT) for the same specimens was also investigated in 1 mol/L NaCl solutions. An approximately 20°C decrease from CPT to critical crevice temperature (CCT) was observed and subsequently explained. Then, the morphologies of crevice corrosion were studied using scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) method. The SEM/EDS study revealed that the ferrite phase was the site where preferential dissolution took place at the initiation step of crevice corrosion, which was in accordance with the prediction by calculating the critical crevice index. Moreover, repassivation was detected with the development of crevice corrosion. The reason was clarified by combining the results obtained with a successful diffusion model, and eventually the crevice corrosion progress was illustrated schematically.


2018 ◽  
Vol 941 ◽  
pp. 679-685
Author(s):  
Kazuyoshi Saida ◽  
Tomo Ogura

The hot cracking (solidification cracking) susceptibility in the weld metals of duplex stainless steels were quantitatively evaluated by Transverse-Varestraint test with gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) and laser beam welding (LBW). Three kinds of duplex stainless steels (lean, standard and super duplex stainless steels) were used for evaluation. The solidification brittle temperature ranges (BTR) of duplex stainless steels were 58K, 60K and 76K for standard, lean and super duplex stainless steels, respectively, and were comparable to those of austenitic stainless steels with FA solidification mode. The BTRs in LBW were 10-15K lower than those in GTAW for any steels. In order to clarify the governing factors of solidification cracking in duplex stainless steels, the solidification segregation behaviours of alloying and impurity elements were numerically analysed during GTAW and LBW. Although the harmful elements to solidification cracking such as P, S and C were segregated in the residual liquid phase in any joints, the solidification segregation of P, S and C in LBW was inhibited compared with GTAW due to the rapid cooling rate in LBW. It followed that the decreased solidification cracking susceptibility of duplex stainless steels in LBW would be mainly attributed to the suppression of solidification segregation of P, S and C.


2011 ◽  
Vol 108 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 451-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Larché ◽  
D. Thierry ◽  
V. Debout ◽  
J. Blanc ◽  
T. Cassagne ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Demian J. Kotecki

Duplex stainless steels (DSS, including super duplex stainless steels {SDSS}) have proven to be very useful engineering materials, albeit with somewhat different welding requirements than those of the more familiar austenitic stainless steels. Despite a generally good track record in welding of duplex stainless steels, certain pitfalls have been encountered with enough frequency that they deserve review. Inappropriate base metal specification often leads to unsuitable heat affected zone (HAZ) properties. Autogenous fusion zones are also of concern. This issue centers around nitrogen limits. The most frequently encountered is applying the UNS S31803 composition for 2205 DSS, instead of the S32205 composition. Inappropriate welding heat input arises most frequently with SDSS. While 0.5 to 1.5 kJ/mm is a normal heat input recommendation for SDSS, either a root pass or many small beads towards the low end of this heat input range tends to result in precipitation and/or secondary austenite formation in weld metal subjected to repeated thermal cycles from multiple weld passes. Inappropriate PWHT occurs when the enhanced nickel filler metals (typically 9% Ni) are used. DSS are not normally given PWHT, but extensive forming of heads, for example, or repair welding of castings, may require a postweld anneal. Specifications such as ASTM A790 and A890 call for annealing at 1040ºC minimum, and the fabricator tends to use temperatures close to that minimum. However, the enhanced nickel filler metals require higher temperatures to dissolve sigma phase that forms during heating to the annealing temperature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document