scholarly journals Influencing Factors Analysis of Facial Nerve Function after the Microsurgical Resection of Acoustic Neuroma

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
WenMing Hong ◽  
HongWei Cheng ◽  
XiaoJie Wang ◽  
ChunGuo Feng
Keyword(s):  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Influencing Factors ◽  
Acoustic Neuroma ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Facial Nerve Function ◽  
Factors Analysis ◽  
Microsurgical Resection

Facial Nerve Dissection by use of Acoustic (Loudspeaker) Facial EMG Monitoring

1986 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam E. Kinney ◽  
Richard Prass
Keyword(s):  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Acoustic Neuroma ◽  
Internal Auditory Canal ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Facial Nerve Function ◽  
Facial Emg ◽  
Acoustic Neuroma Surgery ◽  
Total Tumor Removal

The development of the surgical microscope in 1953, and the subsequent development of microsurgical instrumentation, signaled the beginning of modern-day acoustic neuroma surgery. Preservation of facial nerve function and total tumor removal is the goal of all acoustic neuroma surgery. The refinement of the translabyrinthine removal of acoustic neuromas by Dr. William House’ significantly improved preservation of facial nerve function. This is made possible by the anatomic identification of the facial nerve at the lateral end of the internal auditory canal. When the surgery is accomplished from a suboccipital or retrosigmoid approach, the facial nerve may be identified at the brain stem or within the internal auditory canal. Identifying the facial nerve from the posterior approach is not as anatomically precise as from the lateral approach through the labyrinth. The use of a facial nerve stimulator can greatly facilitate Identification of the facial nerve in these procedures.

Causes of Facial Nerve Paresis after Translabyrinthine Surgery for Acoustic Neuroma

1992 ◽  
Vol 101 (10) ◽  
pp. 821-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Tos ◽  
Jens Thomsen ◽  
Mahmoud Youssef ◽  
Suat Turgut
Keyword(s):  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Brain Stem ◽  
Acoustic Neuroma ◽  
Facial Palsy ◽  
Cerebellopontine Angle ◽  
Patient Records ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Facial Nerve Function ◽  
Common Site ◽  
Nerve Paresis

Forty-six consecutive video-recorded translabyrinthine operations at Gentofte Hospital, for tumors of 5 to 25 mm, were investigated for possible damage to the facial nerve from cauterization, suction, stretching, pushing, and other instrumental trauma at the following regions: fundus, internal meatus, porus, cerebellopontine angle, and brain stem. House-Brackmann grading of the postoperative facial nerve function was determined from the patient records for the 1st, 3rd, and 10th days and 3 months and 6 months postoperatively, as well as the final status. Suction on the nerve seems to be the most important factor for perioperative facial nerve damage. The most common site of damage was the porus region. This investigation shows thermic drilling lesions to be very relevant. There was no correlation between the degree and character of damage and the postoperative facial nerve function. In eight patients we cannot explain the postoperative facial palsy.

Facial Nerve Function After Acoustic Neuroma Surgical Removal

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (Sup 1) ◽  
pp. S40
Author(s):  
Ricardo F. Bento ◽  
Rubens V. de Brito ◽  
Tanit Ganz Sanchez
Keyword(s):  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Acoustic Neuroma ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Facial Nerve Function

Observer variations in the evaluation of facial nerve function after acoustic neuroma surgery

1993 ◽  
Vol 107 (12) ◽  
pp. 1119-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Buchwald ◽  
Mirko Tos ◽  
Jens Thomsen ◽  
Henrik MØller ◽  
Agnete Parving
Keyword(s):  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Acoustic Neuroma ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Surgical Team ◽  
Facial Nerve Function ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Translabyrinthine Approach ◽  
Acoustic Neuroma Surgery ◽  
Grading Scale

This investigation was performed in order to evaluate the observer variations in facial nerve function after surgery for an acoustic neuroma. From 1976–90, 507 patients were operated on by the same surgical team (M.T. and J.T.) using a translabyrinthine approach. One hundred and forty-four patients living in Copenhagen City and County were invited for interview and objective examination. Only 128 patients attended the interview and examination which were carried out by the same ENT physician. Data concerning observation of the facial nerve function only is presented. Its function was clinically evaluated (using the House and Brackmann (1985) grading scale) by two different observers i.e the ENT physician and one of the surgeons. The patients were asked face-to-face with the ENT physician to estimate the degree of facial nerve function according to a 0–100 per cent scale. Comparing normal and abolished facial nerve function the judgments of the ENT physician and the surgeon agreed with the patient‘s own evaluation.

scholarly journals Retrosigmoid Transmeatal Approach for Resection of Acoustic Neuroma: Operative Video and Technical Nuances of Subperineural Dissection for Facial Nerve Preservation

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (S 03) ◽  
pp. S269-S270
Author(s):  
James K. Liu ◽  
Vincent N. Dodson ◽  
Robert W. Jyung
Keyword(s):  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Acoustic Neuroma ◽  
Protective Layer ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Facial Nerve Function ◽  
Tumor Removal ◽  
Nerve Preservation ◽  
Tumor Capsule ◽  
Acoustic Neuromas ◽  
Dissection Technique

The retrosigmoid (suboccipital) approach is the workhorse for most acoustic neuromas in the cerebellopontine angle. In this operative video atlas manuscript, the authors demonstrate the nuances of the subperineural dissection technique for microsurgical resection of an acoustic neuroma via the retrosigmoid transmeatal approach. The plane is developed by separating the perineurium of the vestibular nerve away from the tumor capsule. This perineurium provides a protective layer between the tumor capsule and the facial nerve which serves as a buffer to avoid direct dissection and potential trauma to the facial nerve. Using this technique during extracapsular tumor dissection helps to maximize the extent of tumor removal while preserving facial nerve function. A gross total resection of the tumor was achieved, and the patient exhibited normal facial nerve function (Fig. 1). In summary, the retrosigmoid transmeatal approach with the use of subperineural dissection are important strategies in the armamentarium for surgical management of acoustic neuromas with the goal of maximizing tumor removal and preserving facial nerve function (Fig. 2).The link to the video can be found at: https://youtu.be/L3lPtSvJt60.

scholarly journals Translabyrinthine Approach for Resection of Large Cystic Acoustic Neuroma: Operative Video and Technical Nuances of Subperineural Dissection for Facial Nerve Preservation

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (S 03) ◽  
pp. S267-S268
Author(s):  
James K. Liu ◽  
Vincent N. Dodson ◽  
Robert W. Jyung
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Acoustic Neuroma ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Facial Nerve Function ◽  
Nerve Preservation ◽  
Translabyrinthine Approach ◽  
Acoustic Neuromas ◽  
Extracapsular Dissection ◽  
Cerebellar Retraction

The translabyrinthine approach is advantageous for the resection of large acoustic neuromas compressing the brainstem when hearing loss is nonserviceable. This approach provides wide access through the presigmoid corridor without prolonged cerebellar retraction. Early identification of the facial nerve at the fundus is also achieved. In this operative video atlas manuscript, the authors demonstrate a step-by-step technique for microsurgical resection of a large cystic acoustic neuroma via a translabyrinthine approach. The nuances of microsurgical and skull base technique are illustrated including performing extracapsular dissection of the tumor while maintaining a subperineural plane of dissection to preserve the facial nerve. This strategy maximizes the extent of removal while preserving facial nerve function. A microscopic remnant of tumor was left adherent to the perineurium. A near-total resection of the tumor was achieved and the facial nerve stimulated briskly at low thresholds. Other than preexisting hearing loss, the patient was neurologically intact with normal facial nerve function postoperatively. In summary, the translabyrinthine approach and the use of subperineural dissection are important strategies in the armamentarium for surgical management of large acoustic neuromas while preserving facial nerve function.The link to the video can be found at: https://youtu.be/zld2cSP8fb8.

scholarly journals Long-Term Facial Nerve Outcomes after Microsurgical Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas in Patients with Preoperative Facial Nerve Palsy

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (03) ◽  
pp. 309-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Mooney ◽  
Benjamin Hendricks ◽  
Christina Sarris ◽  
Robert Spetzler ◽  
Randall Porter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Vestibular Schwannoma ◽  
Nerve Palsy ◽  
Facial Nerve Palsy ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Facial Nerve Function ◽  
Microsurgical Resection ◽  
Grade Iii

Objectives This study aimed at evaluating facial nerve outcomes in vestibular schwannoma patients presenting with preoperative facial nerve palsy. Design A retrospective review. Setting Single-institution cohort. Participants Overall, 368 consecutive patients underwent vestibular schwannoma resection. Patients with prior microsurgery or radiosurgery were excluded. Main Outcome Measures Incidence, House–Brackmann grade. Results Of 368 patients, 9 had confirmed preoperative facial nerve dysfunction not caused by prior treatment, for an estimated incidence of 2.4%. Seven of these nine patients had Koos grade 4 tumors. Mean tumor diameter was 3.0 cm (range: 2.1–4.4 cm), and seven of nine tumors were subtotally resected. All nine patients were followed up clinically for ≥ 6 months. Of the six patients with a preoperative House–Brackmann grade of II, two improved to grade I, three were stable, and one patient worsened to grade III. Of the three patients with grade III or worse, all remained stable at last follow-up. Conclusions Preoperative facial nerve palsy is rare in patients with vestibular schwannoma; it tends to occur in patients with relatively large lesions. Detailed long-term outcomes of facial nerve function after microsurgical resection for these patients have not been reported previously. We followed nine patients and found that eight (89%) of the nine patients had either stable or improved facial nerve outcomes after treatment. Management strategies varied for these patients, including rates of subtotal versus gross-total resection and the use of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with residual tumor. These results can be used to help counsel patients preoperatively on expected outcomes of facial nerve function after treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document