scholarly journals International Ultimatum Bargaining Game on Dividing up an Inheritance Successfully- Difference between Germany and the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Bargaining Game ◽  
Ultimatum Bargaining ◽  
Ultimatum Bargaining Game

Hollow Victory: The Minimum Winning Coalition

1976 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 1202-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Hardin
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
General Class ◽  
Winning Coalition ◽  
The United States ◽  
Bargaining Game ◽  
Roll Call ◽  
Restricted Class ◽  
Size Principle ◽  
Zero Sum

The proof of Riker's size principle is inadequate for the general class of zero-sum bargaining games (whether symmetric or asymmetric), and the principle is valid only for a very restricted class of games—the supersymmetric games and their asymmetric counterparts. Butterworth's modification of the size principle (the maximum number of positive gainers principle) can be extended to cover games which are only approximately symmetric. Roll-call voting in the United States House of Representatives overwhelmingly violates the size principle; hence, the House does not generally play a supersymmetric zero-sum bargaining game. More generally, both Butterworth's and Riker's principles seem inapplicable to large bodies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document