Schmorl's Nodes of the Lumbar Spine: Are They Simply Normal

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1085
Author(s):  
Seong Ju Hong ◽  
Kyung Nam Ryu ◽  
Woo Suk Choi ◽  
Yup Yoon
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1753-1760 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Samartzis ◽  
F.P.S. Mok ◽  
J. Karppinen ◽  
D.Y.T. Fong ◽  
K.D.K. Luk ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Israa Mohammed Sadiq

Abstract Background In 1927, Schmorl described a focal herniation of disc material into the adjacent vertebral body through a defect in the endplate, named as Schmorl’s node (SN). The aim of the study is to reveal the prevalence and distribution of Schmorl’s nodes (SNs) in the lumbar spine and their relation to disc degeneration disease in Kirkuk city population. Results A cross-sectional analytic study was done for 324 adults (206 females and 118 males) with lower back pain evaluated as physician requests by lumbosacral MRI at the Azadi Teaching Hospital, Kirkuk city, Iraq. The demographic criteria of the study sample were 20–71 years old, 56–120 kg weight, and 150–181 cm height. SNs were seen in 72 patients (22%). Males were affected significantly more than the females (28.8% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.03). SNs were most significantly affecting older age groups. L1–L2 was the most affected disc level (23.6%) and the least was L5–S1 (8.3%). There was neither a significant relationship between SN and different disc degeneration scores (P = 0.76) nor with disc herniation (P = 0.62, OR = 1.4), but there was a significant relation (P = 0.00001, OR = 7.9) with MC. Conclusion SN is a frequent finding in adults’ lumbar spine MRI, especially in males; it is related to vertebral endplate bony pathology rather than discal pathology.


2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Von Forell ◽  
Todd G. Nelson ◽  
Dino Samartzis ◽  
Anton E. Bowden

Patients with skipped-level disk degeneration (SLDD) were recently reported as having a higher prevalence of Schmorl's nodes than patients with contiguous multi-level disk degeneration (CMDD). Fourteen versions of a nonlinear finite element model of a lumbar spine, representing different patterns of single and multi-level disk degeneration, were simulated under physiological loading. Results show that vertebral strain energy is a possible predictor in the development of Schmorl's nodes. The analysis also shows evidence that the development of Schmorl's nodes may be highly dependent on the location of the degeneration disk, with a higher prevalence at superior levels of the lumbar spine.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. S108
Author(s):  
Ruofeng Yin ◽  
Jeffrey C. Wang ◽  
Elizabeth L. Lord ◽  
Jeremiah R. Cohen ◽  
Shinji Takahashi

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0032-1319934-s-0032-1319934
Author(s):  
D. Samartzis ◽  
F. Mok ◽  
J. Karppinen ◽  
K. Luk ◽  
K. Cheung

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110007
Author(s):  
Zhong-Yuan Wan ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Hua Shan ◽  
Tang-Fen Liu ◽  
Fang Song ◽  
...  

Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Objective: Recently, there has been a rise in children and adolescents developing low back pain and/or sciatica. Degenerative lumbar spine MRI phenotypes can occur in this population but reports have been sporadic and the true incidence of such spine changes remains debatable. As such, the study aimed to address the epidemiology of MRI phenotypes of the lumbar spine in this young population. Methods: 597 children and adolescents with lumbar MRIs were included in the study. T1- and T2-weighted lumbar images from L1/2 to L5/S1 were analyzed in axial and sagittal planes. Global phenotype assessment was performed of each level and based on established nomenclature protocols. Results: The cohort consisted of 57.3% (342) boys and 42.7% (255) girls, with a mean age of 10.75 ± 5.25 years (range: 0 to 18 years). The prevalence of imaging findings of lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) and lumbar disc herniation (LDH) were 2.2% (95% CI: 0.93–3.43) and 5.8% (95%CI: 2.58-8.99), respectively. There was significant difference between each disc segment from L1/2 to L5/S1 for both LDD and LDH. Schmorl’s nodes were noted in 16 cases (2.7%, youngest case as 15 years), with 11 boys (68.8%) and most frequent segment as L3/4. Modic changes and high-intensity zones were absent in this cohort. Conclusions: LDD can emerge as early as the first decade of life with Schmorl’s nodes, without additional specific phenotypes, including Modic changes and high-intensity zones. The study provides valuable information of a unique age group that is often under-represented but equally important as adults.


2015 ◽  
Vol 157 (3) ◽  
pp. 526-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Plomp ◽  
Charlotte Roberts ◽  
Una Strand Vidarsdottir

2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 8-10
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
Leon H. Ensalada

Abstract Recurrent radiculopathy is evaluated by a different approach in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, compared to that in the Fourth Edition. The AMA Guides, Fifth Edition, specifies several occasions on which the range-of-motion (ROM), not the Diagnosis-related estimates (DRE) method, is used to rate spinal impairments. For example, the AMA Guides, Fifth Edition, clarifies that ROM is used only for radiculopathy caused by a recurrent injury, including when there is new (recurrent) disk herniation or a recurrent injury in the same spinal region. In the AMA Guides, Fourth Edition, radiculopathy was rated using the Injury Model, which is termed the DRE method in the Fifth Edition. Also, in the Fourth Edition, for the lumbar spine all radiculopathies resulted in the same impairment (10% whole person permanent impairment), based on that edition's philosophy that radiculopathy is not quantifiable and, once present, is permanent. A rating of recurrent radiculopathy suggests the presence of a previous impairment rating and may require apportionment, which is the process of allocating causation among two or more factors that caused or significantly contributed to an injury and resulting impairment. A case example shows the divergent results following evaluation using the Injury Model (Fourth Edition) and the ROM Method (Fifth Edition) and concludes that revisions to the latter for rating permanent impairments of the spine often will lead to different results compared to using the Fourth Edition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document