scholarly journals Evaluation of critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Dr. Mohan Rao Voruganti ◽  
Dr. Nooruddin Mohammed ◽  
Dr. Vinay Aditya Sangani ◽  
Dr. B Anil Kumar
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
Tanweer Karim ◽  
Subhajeet Dey ◽  
Atul Jain ◽  
Malwinder Singh ◽  
Nabal Mishra ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-425
Author(s):  
Deari Ahmed Ismaeil ◽  
◽  
Barham M. M. Salih ◽  
Karzan Seerwan Abdulla ◽  
◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 2904-2910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shintaro Kurahashi ◽  
Shunichiro Komatsu ◽  
Tatsuki Matsumura ◽  
Yasuyuki Fukami ◽  
Takashi Arikawa ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella ◽  
◽  
Angela Gurrado ◽  
Alessandro Pasculli ◽  
Nicola de Angelis ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Tsalis ◽  
Nikolaos Antoniou ◽  
Zambia Koukouritaki ◽  
Dimitrios Patridas ◽  
Emmanuel Christoforidis ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Zarin ◽  
Muhammad Asim Khan ◽  
Maryam Alam Khan ◽  
Syed Asad Maroof Shah

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (F) ◽  
pp. 52-57
Author(s):  
Danilo Coco ◽  
Silvana Leanza

In 1990, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was considered the new beginning of an exciting period in the management of pathologies associated with gallbladder. Two decades later, biliary morbidity alongside LC is nearly thrice higher compared to conventional open surgery. In the 1990s, Strasberg et al. explained the manner, in which a critical view of safety can be attained and the manner in which vascular injuries and accidental biliary caused by unclear anatomy, incautious control of bleeding, or rare variations could be prevented. The aforementioned principles have been overlooked until recently, only gaining recognition in the past 15 years. This review seeks to explore the aspect of safety in LC based on various techniques.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document