scholarly journals COMPARISON BETWEEN CRITICAL VIEW OF SAFETY AND INFUNDIBULAR TECHNIQUE IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-425
Author(s):  
Deari Ahmed Ismaeil ◽  
◽  
Barham M. M. Salih ◽  
Karzan Seerwan Abdulla ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Critical View ◽  
Critical View Of Safety

scholarly journals Rouviere\'s Sulcus and Critical View of Safety: A Guide to prevent Bile Duct Injury during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
Tanweer Karim ◽  
Subhajeet Dey ◽  
Atul Jain ◽  
Malwinder Singh ◽  
Nabal Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Critical View ◽  
Critical View Of Safety

A novel classification of aberrant right hepatic ducts ensures a critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 2904-2910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shintaro Kurahashi ◽  
Shunichiro Komatsu ◽  
Tatsuki Matsumura ◽  
Yasuyuki Fukami ◽  
Takashi Arikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Critical View ◽  
Critical View Of Safety

scholarly journals The critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Strasberg Yes or No? An Italian Multicentre study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella ◽  
◽  
Angela Gurrado ◽  
Alessandro Pasculli ◽  
Nicola de Angelis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Multicentre Study ◽  
Critical View ◽  
Critical View Of Safety

Open-access Technique and “Critical View of Safety” as the Safest Way to Perform Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Tsalis ◽  
Nikolaos Antoniou ◽  
Zambia Koukouritaki ◽  
Dimitrios Patridas ◽  
Emmanuel Christoforidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Critical View ◽  
Critical View Of Safety ◽  
Access Technique

scholarly journals Critical view of safety faster and safer technique during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Zarin ◽  
Muhammad Asim Khan ◽  
Maryam Alam Khan ◽  
Syed Asad Maroof Shah
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Critical View ◽  
Critical View Of Safety

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC): Toward Zero Error

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (F) ◽  
pp. 52-57
Author(s):  
Danilo Coco ◽  
Silvana Leanza
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Vascular Injuries ◽  
Critical View ◽  
Critical View Of Safety ◽  
The Past ◽  
New Beginning ◽  
Conventional Open Surgery

In 1990, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was considered the new beginning of an exciting period in the management of pathologies associated with gallbladder. Two decades later, biliary morbidity alongside LC is nearly thrice higher compared to conventional open surgery. In the 1990s, Strasberg et al. explained the manner, in which a critical view of safety can be attained and the manner in which vascular injuries and accidental biliary caused by unclear anatomy, incautious control of bleeding, or rare variations could be prevented. The aforementioned principles have been overlooked until recently, only gaining recognition in the past 15 years. This review seeks to explore the aspect of safety in LC based on various techniques.

scholarly journals Are YouTube Videos a Reliable Training Method for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Simulated Decision-Making Exercise to Assess the Critical View of Safety

2021 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. e357-e362
Author(s):  
Dimitrios K. Manatakis ◽  
Emmanouil Mylonakis ◽  
Petros Anagnostopoulos ◽  
Konstantinos Lamprakakis ◽  
Christos Agalianos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Observer Agreement ◽  
Educational Value ◽  
Critical View ◽  
Critical View Of Safety ◽  
Training Tool ◽  
Surgical Trainees ◽  
Cystic Plate ◽  
Correct Application

Abstract Background The present study assesses the educational value of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos on YouTube regarding the correct application of the critical view of safety (CVS), and evaluates… surgical trainees' perceptions of the CVS criteria in a simulated, operative decision-making exercise. Methods YouTube was systematically searched for laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, explicitly reporting a satisfactory CVS. The top 30 most popular videos, by number of views, were identified and scored on the 6-point scale by three experienced consultants. After watching a training module on CVS rationale and criteria, 10 trainees, blinded to the consultants' assessment, were instructed to view the videos, score each criterion and answer the binary question “Would you divide the cystic structures?” by “yes” or “no.” Results An inadequate CVS was found in 30% of the included videos. No statistical association was noted between number of views, likes, or dislikes with successful CVS rates. Inter-observer agreement between consultants and trainees ranged from minimal to moderate (k = 0.07–0.60). Discrepancy between trainees' CVS scores and their simulated decision to proceed to division of the cystic structures was found in 15% of assessments, with intra-observer agreement ranging from minimal to excellent (k = 0.27–1.0). For the CVS requirements, inter-observer agreement was minimal for the dissection of the cystic plate (k = 0.26) and triangle clearance (k = 0.39) and moderate for the identification of two and only two structures (k = 0.42). Conclusion The CVS is central to the culture of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical videos are a useful training tool as simulated, operative decision-making exercises. However, public video platforms should be used judiciously, since their content is not peer-reviewed or quality-controlled.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document