9. Sustainability of rural sanitation in Venezuela; Pit-latrine-emptying using motorized equipment; Sanitation and hygiene, Bangladesh’s action; Sustainability of Lusaka sewage works; Participatory hygiene and sanitation programme

Author(s):  
David Holmes ◽  
Michael Jere ◽  
A.T. Dzotizei ◽  
M. Munjoma ◽  
T.V. Luong ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 607-621
Author(s):  
Bloodless Dzwairo

Abstract This paper provides a multi-date review of trends in groundwater pollution from pit latrine sanitation structures using global, regional and South African cases. The paper focuses on three parameters which are microorganisms, nitrate and phosphorus, which are aligned with the challenge of waterborne diseases, and generally linked to poor water quality, and inadequate sanitation and hygiene. Poor sanitation and hygiene open up transmission routes for ingestion of faecal matter, which as at 2018 continue to pose risks of diarrhoea, opportunistic infections, and consequent malnutrition. These challenges currently account for approximately 1.7 million deaths annually, of which more than 90% are in developing countries, which have low sanitation coverage. While pit toilets are the generally preferred form of sanitation technology for developing countries, most provide evidence of the interconnectedness between the structures and groundwater pollution. The mechanism of pollution is generally indicated to be seepage of polluted pit latrine leachate into groundwater. This specific type of microbial and chemical routing from toilets into the environment increases the prevalence of diseases. These diseases usually result in high mortality for developing countries. Therefore, this review has highlighted the need to minimize pollution of groundwater from pit latrines, thereby contributing towards sustainable water quality management.


Author(s):  
Charles Ssemugabo ◽  
Solomon Tsebeni Wafula ◽  
Rawlance Ndejjo ◽  
Jimmy Osuret ◽  
David Musoke ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study assessed characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda. Methods We conducted a household-based cross-sectional study among 395 households in Kasubi slum using a semi-structured questionnaire and observational checklist to collect data. Results Almost 98.0% (387/395) of households owned a sanitation facility and 77.0% (298/387) shared it with other households. The most common type of sanitation facility was a pit latrine with slab (66.9% [259/387]). Most (90.5% [305/337]) latrines had a door or shutter, a roof (92.9% [313/337]) and a depth >1.5 m (68.2% [229/337]). Overall, 21.3% (84/395) and 65.6% (259/395) of households had improved and functional sanitation facilities, respectively. Only 16.5% (65/395) of the households had a hand-washing facility. Student-led (adjusted prevalence rate [PR] 2.67 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83–3.94]) and households that owned their house (adjusted PR 2.17 [95% CI 1.33–3.53]) were 2.67 and 2.17 times more likely to have improved sanitation facilities, respectively. Households that owned their house (adjusted PR 1.90 [95% CI 1.18–3.05]) were 1.9 times more likely to possess a hand-washing facility. Conclusions The coverage of improved sanitation and hygiene facilities was low. The majority of households were using a shared pit latrine with a slab that had no hand-washing facility. Sanitation and hygiene interventions should prioritize improving sanitation and hygiene facilities.


Waterlines ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Carter
Keyword(s):  

Waterlines ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Christensen Rand ◽  
Crispen Wilson ◽  
Jessica Mercer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document