Discussion

2020 ◽  
pp. 145-177
Author(s):  
Warren Maguire

This chapter considers three main topics in the phonological development of MUE: contact with Irish; the input from English dialects; and input from Scots. The lack of direct input from Irish is discussed, as is the notion of ‘reinforcement’ and the problems there are with it. Irish input was minimal because of the large native English speaker population, unidirectional bilingualism, a long term shift from Irish with small numbers of English learners at any one time, and the lower social status of Irish speakers. The English input is considered in terms of New Dialect Formation, which was instrumental in the formation of the dialect, and Colonial Lag, which is probably not a useful notion in this context despite some apparent conservatism on the part of the dialect. Scots input was of specific kinds, affecting the phonetic realisation of vowels and certain kinds of lexical distribution of them, suggesting that Scots speakers shifted to English as adults, imposing certain Scots phonetic and phonotactic rules on it.

Author(s):  
V. Borshcheva ◽  
E. Efland

Errors and mistakes are a natural part of the process of learning a language, but the attitudes to them by students and teachers differ. The article is based on the results of the survey devoted to this issue. The value of the research is the contribution of a native English speaker that provides a different angle on the nature of errors and mistakes. The authors point out the importance of the psychological component and the creation of the cooperation learning environment for the effective learning process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 1340-1351
Author(s):  
Françoise Brosseau-Lapré ◽  
Wan Hee Kim

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of preschoolers with speech sound disorder (SSD) and with typical speech and language development (TD) to understand foreign-accented words, providing a window into the quality of their underlying phonological representations. We also investigated the relationship between vocabulary skills and the ability to identify words that are frequent and have few neighbors (lexically easy words) and words that are less frequent and have many neighbors (lexically hard words). Method Thirty-two monolingual English-speaking children (16 with SSD, 16 with TD), ages 4 and 5 years, completed standardized speech and language tests and a two-alternative forced-choice word identification task of English words produced by a native English speaker and a native Korean speaker. Results Children with SSD had more difficulty identifying words produced by both talkers than children with TD and showed a larger difficulty identifying Korean-accented words. Both groups of children identified lexically easy words more accurately than lexically hard words, although this difference was not significant when including receptive vocabulary skills in the analysis. Identification of lexically hard words, both those produced by the native English speaker and the nonnative English speaker, increased with vocabulary size. Conclusion Considering the performance of the children with SSD under ideal listening conditions in this study, we can assume that, as a group, children with SSD may experience greater difficulty identifying foreign-accented words in environments with background noise.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105345122110510
Author(s):  
María Cioè-Peña

Remote schooling has increased in prevalence. Although remote schooling may feel novel, remote and online educational requirements have been consistent parts of the educational landscape for years. Remote schooling increases learning opportunities within the home, magnifying the need for home-school collaborations to support the academic and socio-emotional development of marginalized learners in urban settings, particularly multiply marginalized learners such as students classified as English learners who also have a high incidence disabilities (e.g., learning disability, speech and language impairment, autism spectrum disorder). Much policy and practice around remote schooling centers on ensuring students have access to devices and technology; little consideration is given to what happens after devices are distributed, especially within culturally and linguistically diverse households. This paper explores considerations to be made before, during, and after engaging in remote schooling, whether it’s for short- or long-term use, to ensure that students who are dually classified are not digitally excluded during remote schooling.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Lindsey N. Landry ◽  
Milena Keller-Margulis ◽  
Michael Matta ◽  
Hanjoe Kim ◽  
Jorge E. Gonzalez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document