Rectal cancer – current treatment strategy and the tumor regression grade evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy in patients who underwent surgery at the I. Department of Surgery, General University Hospital in Prague between 2012 and 2016

2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Oncological Treatment ◽  
Regression Grade

Introduction: The article contains a summary of the issues of staging and therapy with an emphasis on the neoadjuvant treatment and associated tumor regression grade with the analysis of our own group of patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with rectal cancer who underwent a surgery at the 1st Department of Surgery – Thoratic, Abdominal and Injury Surgery; First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic, focusing on those who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and their pathologists evaluated tumor regression grade after the resection. Results: The group consists of 161 patients operated on between 2012 and 2016. 47 patients underwent neoadjuvant oncological treatment with further evaluation of the tumor regression grade by a pathologist, a scoring system according to Ryan was used. A complete pathological response was elicited in 10.4% of patients, no response in 35.4% of patients, and partial tumor regression in 54.2%. Conclusion: Although there is a difference in our results compared to foreign publications, the proportion of patients remains comparable. Studies evaluating the advantages versus disadvantages of neoadjuvant therapy will certainly follow, and the question of the suitability of surgical treatment as the only curative solution is partially raised.

Impact of biomarker dynamic profile and pathological response induced by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3614-3614
Author(s):  
A. L. Gentile ◽  
C. Pinto ◽  
C. Ceccarelli ◽  
F. Di Fabio ◽  
C. Funaioli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Rectal Surgery ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Operative Specimen

3614 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation among biomarkers, pathological response and clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with rectal cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Methods: Pts entering the study had rectal adenocarcinoma, uT3/4N-/+ or uT2N-/+ with inferior location. Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 weekly infusion IV for 6 times and 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m2/die continuous infusion IV d 1–38. Radiotherapy was delivered up to a dose of 50.4 Gy in daily fractions of 1.8 Gy d 1–38. Rectal surgery with TME was performed 6–8 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment. Immunohistochemical determination of Ki67, p53, bcl2, TS, EGFR, MLH1 and MSH2 was performed in pretreatment biopsy and operative specimen. Results: Between March 2002 and May 2005, 32 pts had completed neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. Pt characteristics: 24 (75%) men and 8 (25%) women; median age 64 (33–80) years; stage uT2N-M0 3 (9.4%) pts, uT3N-M0 14 (43.8%), uT3N+M0 10 (31.2%), uT3NXM0 2 (6.2%), uT4N+M0 3 (9.4%). Surgery consisted of abdominal-perineal amputation in 12 (37.5%) and low-anterior resection in 17 (53.1%) pts, with negative circumferential resection margins in 86.2%. Laparoscopic local excision was performed in 3 (9.4%) pts. Pathological down-staging occurred in 18 (56.2%) pts, including 7 (21.9%) pT0N0, with sphincter preservation in 40%. Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) (according to Mandard) evaluation of operative specimen was: 7 TRG1, 11 TRG2, 11 TRG3 and 3 TRG4. Expression mean value in pretreatment biopsy and operative specimen was: Ki67 88.8% and 31.7%; p53 49.7% and 40.7%; TS 12.6% and 10.0%; MLH1 89.7% and 76.4%; MSH2 84.3% and 72.2%. The evaluation of biomarker profile in operative specimen of TRG2 pts vs TRG3–4 showed: Ki67 16.6% vs 46.2% (p=0.03); TS 4.5% vs 12.9% (ns); MSH2 82.3% vs 65.6% (ns); p53 52.3% vs 34.8% (ns). Median DFS was 19 (3–35) months. At a median follow-up of 22 (5–41) months, 100.0% of TRG1 pts, 90.9% of TRG2, 73.3% of TRG3–4 had no-evidence of disease relapse. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest a correlation between Ki67 and pathological response in rectal cancer pts treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Moreover, DFS appears to be related to TRG. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals New tumor regression grade for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and radical surgery

Oncotarget ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (39) ◽  
pp. 42222-42231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
Junjie Hu ◽  
Sai Liu ◽  
Jie Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Regression Grade

scholarly journals Density and distribution of lymphocytes in pretherapeutic rectal cancer and response to neoadjuvant therapy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sicong Lai ◽  
Xiaoying Lou ◽  
Xinjuan Fan ◽  
Weipeng Sun ◽  
Yanhong Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Regression Grade

Abstract Background Lymphocytic density in rectal cancer has been reported to be associated with therapeutic response, but the role of the lymphocytic distribution pattern remains to be determined. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the distribution and density of lymphocytes in rectal-cancer tissue with tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy. Methods We retrospectively analysed 134 patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy within a prospectively maintained cohort. Pretherapeutic biopsy samples were stained with immunohistochemistry (CD4 and CD8). Densities of intratumoral periglandular lymphocytes (IPLs) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were assessed separately. Logistic-regression analysis was used to assess associations of lymphocyte densities with tumor regression grade (TRG), controlling for clinicopathological, molecular, and regimen features. Results Compared with cases in the lowest quartile of CD8+ TILs, those in the highest quartile were significantly associated with better TRG (multivariate odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.76; P < 0.001). In contrast, CD8+ IPLs, CD4+ IPLs, and CD4+ TILs were not significantly associated with TRG (P = 0.033, 0.156, and 0.170, respectively). Sensitivity analyses detected no interaction between CD8+ TILs and regimen of neoadjuvant radiation (Pinteraction = 0.831) or chemotherapy (Pinteraction = 0.879) on TRG. Conclusions Our data suggest that CD8+ TILs, but not IPLs, are independently associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy, regardless of the regimen of radiation or chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Pre-Treatment T2-WI Based Radiomics Features for Prediction of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Preliminary Study

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Petresc ◽  
Andrei Lebovici ◽  
Cosmin Caraiani ◽  
Diana Sorina Feier ◽  
Florin Graur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Pre Treatment

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is very heterogeneous and up to 30% of patients are considered non-responders, presenting no tumor regression after nCRT. This study aimed to determine the ability of pre-treatment T2-weighted based radiomics features to predict LARC non-responders. A total of 67 LARC patients who underwent a pre-treatment MRI followed by nCRT and total mesorectal excision were assigned into training (n = 44) and validation (n = 23) groups. In both datasets, the patients were categorized according to the Ryan tumor regression grade (TRG) system into non-responders (TRG = 3) and responders (TRG 1 and 2). We extracted 960 radiomic features/patient from pre-treatment T2-weighted images. After a three-step feature selection process, including LASSO regression analysis, we built a radiomics score with seven radiomics features. This score was significantly higher among non-responders in both training and validation sets (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03) and it showed good predictive performance for LARC non-response, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.94 (95% CI: 0.82–0.99) in the training set and AUC = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.58–0.94) in the validation group. The multivariate analysis identified the radiomics score as an independent predictor for the tumor non-response (OR = 6.52, 95% CI: 1.87–22.72). Our results indicate that MRI radiomics features could be considered as potential imaging biomarkers for early prediction of LARC non-response to neoadjuvant treatment.

scholarly journals Factors associated with rectal tumor and their influence on tumor regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 611-616
Author(s):  
Yu R Aliyarov
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Rectal Tumor ◽  
Chemoradiation Therapy ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Regression Grade

Aim. To determine relation between localization, grade of invasion and differentiation in rectal tumor and tumor regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Methods. 88 patients with local advanced rectal cancer (Т2-4N0-2М0) were analyzed: 46 females and 42 males. The average age was 52.4±1.4 years. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In all groups regardless of tumor localization patients with stage T3 and moderate differentiation grade predominated. Results. Complete pathological tumor response of grade 4 (TRG4) was revealed in 13 (14.7%) patients, grade 3 (TRG3) in 34 (38.6%) patients, low treatment effect (tumor response grade 2, TRG2) was registered in 26 (29.5%) patients, and lack of treatment effect (grade 1, TRG1) in 15 (17.2%) patients. Analysis of the data from patients with complete or nearly complete tumor regression (grade 3 and 4) demonstrated that such effect of neoadjuvant treatment was most often observed in patients with tumor localized in rectal lower ampulla (58.6%). Among patients with moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas, patients with tumor response of grade 3 and 4 predominated: 28 (56%) patients. According to invasion grade, in all groups patients with therapeutic response grade 3 and 4 prevailed, but most prominently - in groups of patients with stage T4a and T4b - 58.9%. Conclusion. The closer to anus tumor is located, the more significant effect neoadjuvant therapy has; moderate tumor differentiation grade can be considered as a relative predictive factor of tumor regression on preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document