scholarly journals Importance of Tumor Regression Grade in ypStage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. e3
Author(s):  
J.H. Chung ◽  
C. Song ◽  
S.B. Kang ◽  
D.W. Kim ◽  
J.H. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Regression Grade

Rectal cancer – current treatment strategy and the tumor regression grade evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy in patients who underwent surgery at the I. Department of Surgery, General University Hospital in Prague between 2012 and 2016

2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Oncological Treatment ◽  
Regression Grade

Introduction: The article contains a summary of the issues of staging and therapy with an emphasis on the neoadjuvant treatment and associated tumor regression grade with the analysis of our own group of patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with rectal cancer who underwent a surgery at the 1st Department of Surgery – Thoratic, Abdominal and Injury Surgery; First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic, focusing on those who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and their pathologists evaluated tumor regression grade after the resection. Results: The group consists of 161 patients operated on between 2012 and 2016. 47 patients underwent neoadjuvant oncological treatment with further evaluation of the tumor regression grade by a pathologist, a scoring system according to Ryan was used. A complete pathological response was elicited in 10.4% of patients, no response in 35.4% of patients, and partial tumor regression in 54.2%. Conclusion: Although there is a difference in our results compared to foreign publications, the proportion of patients remains comparable. Studies evaluating the advantages versus disadvantages of neoadjuvant therapy will certainly follow, and the question of the suitability of surgical treatment as the only curative solution is partially raised.

scholarly journals Overexpression of MLPH in Rectal Cancer Patients Correlates with a Poorer Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Reduced Patient Survival

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2132
Author(s):  
Wan-Shan Li ◽  
Chih-I Chen ◽  
Hsin-Pao Chen ◽  
Kuang-Wen Liu ◽  
Chia-Jen Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Protein Transport ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiation ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Cancer Dataset ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Regression Grade

Data mining of a public transcriptomic rectal cancer dataset (GSE35452) from the Gene Expression Omnibus, National Center for Biotechnology Information identified the melanophilin (MLPH) gene as the most significant intracellular protein transport-related gene (GO:0006886) associated with a poor response to preoperative chemoradiation. An MLPH immunostain was performed on biopsy specimens from 172 rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation; samples were divided into high- and low-expression groups by H-scores. Subsequently, the correlations between MLPH expression and clinicopathologic features, tumor regression grade, disease-specific survival (DSS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MeFS) were analyzed. MLPH expression was significantly associated with CEA level (p = 0.001), pre-treatment tumor status (p = 0.022), post-treatment tumor status (p < 0.001), post-treatment nodal status (p < 0.001), vascular invasion (p = 0.028), and tumor regression grade (p < 0.001). After uni- and multi-variable analysis of five-year survival, MLPH expression was still associated with lower DSS (hazard ratio (HR), 10.110; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.178–46.920; p = 0.003) and MeFS (HR, 5.621; 95% CI, 1.762–17.931; p = 0.004). In conclusion, identifying MLPH expression could help to predict the response to chemoradiation and survival, and aid in personal therapeutic modification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document