scholarly journals The Impact of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 on Foreign Direct Investment to and from the United States

10.3386/w3234 ◽  
1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Slemrod
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Tax Reform ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Sanctions and Foreign Direct Investment: Damage to Russia and Sanctioning Countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-53
Author(s):  
S. V. Kazantsev
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Foreign Investments ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Impact

The volume and dynamics of foreign investments are formed under the influence of many conditions and circumstances. The author of this article examines the impact of one class of factors that determine the dynamics and geographical structure of Russia’s foreign direct investment inflows outflows. These are anti-Russian sanctions imposed by a group of States in 2014 to isolate the Russian Federation in the field of politics, finance and economy, science and technology, information and culture. For these countries, Russia is not a priority investment target. The share of the Russian Federation varied from two to five per cent, and rarely exceeded 10 per cent of the total volume of these countries foreign direct investment net outflows in 2007–2018. The author presented in this article the positive and negative aspects of foreign direct investment, their dynamics before and after the imposition of sanctions. In particular, the author shows that the reduction in the foreign direct investment net inflows from Russia to the sanctioning countries was less significant for the leading EU States — Germany, France and United Kingdom — than for many other sanctioning countries The cuts in Russia’s foreign direct investment net outflows had almost no impact on the United States who was the main initiator of anti-Russian sanctions.

scholarly journals THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH (A CAUSAL STUDY IN THE UNITED STATES)

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donny Susilo
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Economic Growth ◽  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Model ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Development Effort ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
The Impact

<p>International investment is strategic step for country due to lack of capital and technology transfer and it is generally well known as Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). Many policy makers and academics contend that FDI can have important positive effects on a host country’s development effort. This research examines the impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth in the United States by multiple linear regression model and its estimation using ordinary least squares (OLS). This research classifies all the sectors to be 10 sectors. This research uses data for the period 2000 –2017 and suggests that not all forms of foreign investment seem to be beneficial to host economies. Some sectors provide positive correlation to economic growth and some provides negative effect. Nevertheless, it is significant yet, this is because there is different characteristic between developed and developing countries. Economic growth in the U.S is mostly driven by personal consumption.</p>

scholarly journals The Impact of United States Tax Policies on Sectoral Foreign Direct Investment to Asia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Mercer-Blackman ◽  
Shiela Camingue-Romance
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Corporate Income Tax ◽  
Market Size ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
The Impact

Using panel data at the country and sector level spanning almost 15 years, this paper shows that the corporate income tax rate does not affect the United States’ inward foreign direct investment once market size, costs, openness, and the business environment, are taken into account. This is true for United States foreign direct investment bound to developing Asia and across most sectors.

The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: The case of the United States

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 101428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Wasif Zafar ◽  
Syed Anees Haider Zaidi ◽  
Naveed R. Khan ◽  
Faisal Mehmood Mirza ◽  
Fujun Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Human Capital ◽  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Natural Resources ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Ecological Footprint ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Impact

The Impact of the Renegotiation of USCM on the Agricultural Exports of Sinaloa

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
José G. Vargas-Hernández
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Agricultural Exports ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Impact

Mexico, like other countries, invested in measures to attract foreign direct investment to their territories. I, therefore, signed USCM in 1994, a treaty that imposed Mexico as the largest direct exporter of the United States, a country that is likely to leave the treaty by renegotiating USMC. Therefore, this research is carried out to determine the advantages and disadvantages of renegotiation based on Sinaloa’s agricultural exports, with the question of whether it would negatively impact the USMC renegotiation of Sinaloa’s agricultural exports, with the hypothesis that renegotiation of USMC has a negative effect on Sinaloa agricultural exports. The purpose of this paper will be with results in favor of the hypothesis employed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document