scholarly journals Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changling Li ◽  
Xiaochang Leng ◽  
Jingsong He ◽  
Yongqing Xia ◽  
Wenbing Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Stable Angina ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Coronary Artery Stenosis ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: A new method for calculating fraction flow reserve (FFR) without pressure-wire (angiography-derived FFR) based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) images can be used to evaluate the functional problems of coronary stenosis.Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of a novel method of calculating the FFR compared to wire-based FFR using retrospectively collected data from patients with stable angina.Methods: Three hundred patients with stable angina pectoris who underwent ICA and FFR measurement were included in this study. Two ICA images with projections >25° apart at the end-diastolic frame were selected for 3D reconstruction. Then, the contrast frame count was performed in an angiographic run to calculate the flow velocity. Based on the segmented vessel, calculated velocity, and aortic pressure, AccuFFRangio distribution was calculated through the pressure drop equation.Results: Using FFR ≤ 0.8 as a reference, we evaluated AccuFFRangio performance for 300 patients with its accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Comparison of AccuFFRangio with wire-measured FFR resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.954 (per-vessel, p < 0.0001). Accuracy for AccuFFRangio was 93.7% for Pa set from measurement and 87% for Pa = 100 mmHg in this clinical study. Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for per-vessel were 90, 95, 86.7, 96.3, and 57.5, 97.7, 90.2, 86.3%, respectively. Overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for 2-dimensional (2D) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were 63.3, 42.5, 70.9, 34.7, and 77.2%, respectively. The average processing time of AccuFFRangio was 4.30 ± 1.87 min.Conclusions: AccuFFRangio computed from coronary ICA images can be an accurate and time-efficient computational tool for detecting lesion-specific ischemia of coronary artery stenosis.

scholarly journals Accuracy of computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to coronary angiography to derive fractional flow reserve: FLASH FFR

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (7) ◽  
pp. 1349-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianping Li ◽  
Yanjun Gong ◽  
Weimin Wang ◽  
Qing Yang ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Dynamics ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Fractional Flow Reserve ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Performance Goal ◽  
Flow Reserve

Abstract Aims Conventional fractional flow reserve (FFR) is measured invasively using a coronary guidewire equipped with a pressure sensor. A non-invasive derived FFR would eliminate risk of coronary injury, minimize technical limitations, and potentially increase adoption. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a computational pressure-flow dynamics derived FFR (caFFR), applied to coronary angiography, compared to invasive FFR. Methods and results The FLASH FFR study was a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study conducted at six centres in China. Eligible patients had native coronary artery target lesions with visually estimated diameter stenosis of 30–90% and diagnosis of stable or unstable angina pectoris. Using computational pressure-fluid dynamics, in conjunction with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count, applied to coronary angiography, caFFR was measured online in real-time and compared blind to conventional invasive FFR by an independent core laboratory. The primary endpoint was the agreement between caFFR and FFR, with a pre-specified performance goal of 84%. Between June and December 2018, matched caFFR and FFR measurements were performed in 328 coronary arteries. Total operational time for caFFR was 4.54 ± 1.48 min. caFFR was highly correlated to FFR (R = 0.89, P = 0.76) with a mean bias of −0.002 ± 0.049 (95% limits of agreement −0.098 to 0.093). The diagnostic performance of caFFR vs. FFR was diagnostic accuracy 95.7%, sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 98.6%, positive predictive value 97.2%, negative predictive value 95.0%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.979. Conclusions Using wire-based FFR as the reference, caFFR has high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. caFFR could eliminate the need of a pressure wire, technical error and potentially increase adoption of physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn Unique Identifier: ChiCTR1800019522.

scholarly journals Validation of the diagnostic performance of ‘HeartMedi V.1.0’, a novel CT-derived fractional flow reserve measurement, for patients with coronary artery disease: a study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e037780
Author(s):  
Soo-Hyun Kim ◽  
Si-Hyuck Kang ◽  
Woo-Young Chung ◽  
Chang-Hwan Yoon ◽  
Sang-Don Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Fractional Flow Reserve ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Flow Reserve

IntroductionCoronary CT angiography (CCTA) is widely used for non-invasive coronary artery evaluation, but it is limited in identifying the nature of functional characteristics that cause ischaemia. Recent computational fluid dynamic (CFD) techniques applied to CCTA images permit non-invasive computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR), a measure of lesion-specific ischaemia. However, this technology has limitations, such as long computational time and the need for expensive equipment, which hinder widespread use.Methods and analysisThis study is a prospective, multicentre, comparative and confirmatory trial designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HeartMedi V.1.0, a novel CT-derived FFR measurement for the detection of haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses identified by CCTA, based on invasive FFR as a reference standard. The invasive FFR values ≤0.80 will be considered haemodynamically significant. The study will enrol 184 patients who underwent CCTA, invasive coronary angiography and invasive FFR. Computational FFR (c-FFR) will be analysed by CFD techniques using a lumped parameter model based on vessel length method. Blinded core laboratory interpretation will be performed for CCTA, invasive coronary angiography, invasive FFR and c-FFR. The primary objective of the study is to compare the area under the receiver–operator characteristic curve between c-FFR and CCTA to non-invasively detect the presence of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. The secondary endpoints include diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and correlation of c-FFR with invasive FFR.Ethics and disseminationThe study has ethic approval from the ethics committee of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (E-1709/420-001) and informed consent will be obtained for all enrolled patients. The result will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberKCT0002725; Pre-results.

Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio discordance in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Yamanaka ◽  
K Shishido ◽  
S Yokota ◽  
N Moriyama ◽  
Y Mashimo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Stenosis ◽  
Fractional Flow Reserve ◽  
Coronary Artery Stenosis ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Left Anterior Descending Artery ◽  
Flow Reserve

Abstract Background It has been reported that discordance between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio (iFR) could occur in up to 20% of cases. However, there are no reports regarding discordance between FFR and iFR in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). Purpose We aimed to investigate the discordance between FFR and iFR in patients with severe AS. Methods Severe AS was defined as an aortic-valve area of ≤1.0 cm2, a mean aortic-valve gradient of 40mmHg or more, or a peak aortic-jet velocity of 4.0 m/s or more. Intermediate coronary artery stenosis was defined as 30% to 70% stenosis (visual estimation). FFR and iFR were calculated in 4 quadrants based on values of FFR ≤0.8 and iFR ≤0.89 (positive discordance; low FFR and high iFR, negative discordance; high FFR and low iFR). Results We examined consecutive 140 patients (164 intermediate coronary artery stenosis vessels). Mean FFR and iFR ± standard deviation was 0.82±0.09 and 0.82±0.14, respectively. The discordance was observed in 48 vessels (29.3%). In the discordant group, most of cases were negative discordance (45 cases, 93.6%). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that left anterior descending artery (Hazard Ratio 3.80; 1.55 to 9.31, p=0.0036) was independently associated with negative discordance. Conclusions In patients with severe AS, the discordance between FFR and iFR could be observed in 29.3% of the vessels, mostly negative discordance. The left anterior descending artery is an independent predictor for negative discordance. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 15758: Relationship Between Physiological Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity Assessed by Fractional Flow Reserve and Optical Coherence Tomography Findings in Stable Angina Pectoris

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsumin Lee ◽  
Tadashi Murai ◽  
Yoshihisa Kanaji ◽  
Eisuke Usui ◽  
Makoto Araki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Angina Pectoris ◽  
Stable Angina ◽  
Coronary Stenosis ◽  
Coronary Artery Stenosis ◽  
Stable Angina Pectoris ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Stenosis Severity

Backgrounds: The aim of the present study is to investigate the relationship between physiological coronary artery stenosis severity and lesion instability by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP). Methods and Results: We investigated 198 culprit lesions of 180 SAP patients who underwent OCT imaging and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement before PCI procedure. Physiological coronary stenosis severity was assessed by FFR analysis, and lesions were divided into two groups on the basis of FFR values; severe stenosis group (group S): FFR <0.75 (n=78, 39%), moderate stenosis group (group M): FFR ≥0.75 (n=120, 61%) according to the previous study. Thin-capped fibroatheroma (TCFA) was defined as lipid-rich plaque (lipid arc ≥90°) with fibrous cap thickness <70μm. The median FFR values in total lesions, group S, and group M were 0.77 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.69—0.83), 0.65 (0.57—0.72), and 0.81 (0.78—0.87), respectively. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics expect for the frequency of previous myocardial infarction (S: 15%, M: 38%, P <0.01) and previous PCI (S: 29%, M: 60%, P <0.01). In angiographic analysis, there were significant differences in the frequency of culprit lesion location in LAD (S: 72%, M: 49%, P <0.01), minimum lumen diameter (S: 1.07±0.36 mm, M: 1.35±0.32 mm, P <0.01), % diameter stenosis (S: 58.9 % [53.1—70.8], M: 52.8 % [47.7—57.5], P <0.01), and lesion length (S: 13.7 mm [10.6—17.5], M: 11.5 mm [9.2—14.5], P = 0.02) between the two groups. In OCT analysis, there were significant differences in the lipid arc (S: 200° [160—232], M: 168° [143—211], P <0.01), CT (S: 110 μm [63—157], M: 140 μm [93—197], P <0.01), and frequency of TCFA (S: 27%, M: 9%, P <0.01) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of LAD lesions showed similar results between the two groups. Conclusions: Lesions of physiologically severe coronary stenosis in SAP were associated with lesion instability assessed by OCT. These findings may challenge the concept that lesions responsible for acute coronary syndromes are mild in most cases provided that plaque rupture of TCFA evenly results in coronary events in the wide range of stenosis severity in patients with SAP.

Systemic immune-inflammation index is a novel marker to predict functionally significant coronary artery stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (16) ◽  
pp. 1553-1561
Author(s):  
Mehmet Erdoğan ◽  
Mehmet A Erdöl ◽  
Selçuk Öztürk ◽  
Tahir Durmaz
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Stenosis ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Predictive Capacity ◽  
Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Immune Inflammation

Aim: The study aimed to investigate and compare the predictive capacity of a systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) to determine a hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve (FFR). Patients & methods: A total of 207 chronic coronary syndrome patients with FFR measurement were enrolled in the study. NLR, PLR and SII levels were calculated. Results: The cut-off value of the SII (620) was associated with 78.4% sensitivity and 64.0% specificity to predict a hemodynamically significant stenosis. SII level independently predicted FFR ≤0.80. Conclusion: SII is an independent predictor of functionally significant coronary stenosis detected by FFR in chronic coronary syndrome patients. SII levels can predict hemodynamically severe obstruction better than NLR and PLR.

P5633Diagnostic impact of resting full-cycle ratio as newly developed non-hyperemic indices for physiological lesion assessment

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Takashima ◽  
A Suzuki ◽  
S Sakurai ◽  
H Ando ◽  
Y Nakano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Entire Range ◽  
Coronary Artery Stenosis ◽  
Stable Condition ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Gold Standard Method ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Lesion Severity

Abstract Background Although fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a gold standard method to evaluate functional lesion severity in the catheterization laboratory, the need of hyperemic condition limits the widespread adoption of FFR. Recently, the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) which was newly developed resting indices was launched. It is unclear whether RFR as resting condition could assess physiological lesion severity of coronary artery stenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic impact of RFR compared to FFR in entire range of coronary artery stenosis. Method A total of 53 patients with 70 lesions were enrolled in this study. The RFR was measured after adequately waiting for stable condition, while FFR was measured after intravenous administration of ATP (180mcg/kg/min). Lesions with FFR ≤0.80 were considered functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Results In all lesions, reference diameter, diameter stenosis, lesion length, RFR, and FFR were 3.3±0.8mm, 44±12%, 14.6±7.2mm, 0.90±0.11, and 0.83±0.11, respectively. Functional significance was observed in 24 lesions (34%) of all lesions. The RFR showed a significant correlation with FFR (y = 0.800x + 0.239, R = 0.817, p<0.001). The Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a good agreement with a mean difference of 0.07 and a standard deviation of 0.06 between RFR and FFR across entire range of coronary artery stenosis. ROC curve analysis showed an excellent accuracy of RFR cut-off of ≤0.90 in predicting FFR ≤0.80 which had 78% sensitivity and 87% specificity (AUC 0.87, diagnostic accuracy 84%). Conclusion The RFR as newly resting indices is reliable to the assessment of functional lesion severity. This physiology-based approach may be a possible alternative method for FFR measurements in daily practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document