scholarly journals Transposition of Isolated Left Vertebral Artery in Hybrid Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangmin Yang ◽  
Hongwei Chen ◽  
Guangxiao Sun ◽  
Wensheng Lou ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Left Vertebral Artery ◽  
Fogarty Catheter ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Hybrid Procedures ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Pathology

Objectives: The aim of this study was to present our experience with the management of isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) during complex thoracic aortic pathology treated with the hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair.Methods: This is a single-center, respective cohort study. Between June 2016 and June 2020, 13 patients (12 men; median age 60 years old, range 42–72 years old) who underwent hybrid procedures were identified with ILVA in our center. Demographics, imaging features, operation details, and follow-up in these patients were collected and analyzed.Results: In this study, all patients received the hybrid procedure, and the primary technical success rate was 100%. There were no in-hospital deaths. Complication occurred in two (15.4%) patients. One patient suffered from contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) and recovered before discharge. Another patient required reintervention for acute left-lower-limb ischemia, which was successfully treated using Fogarty catheter embolectomy. Immediate vagus/recurrent laryngeal never palsy, lymphocele, and chylothorax were not observed. The median duration of follow-up was 22 months (range, 13–29 months). No neurologic deficits, bypass occlusion, or ILVA occlusion or stenosis were observed during the follow-up. No aortic rupture, cerebrovascular accident, or spinal cord ischemia was observed during the follow-up period.Conclusions: Our limited experience reveals that hybrid procedures [thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), ILVA transposition, and left common carotid artery-left subclavian artery (LCCA-LSA) bypass] are relatively safe, feasible, and durable for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathology with ILVA. However, further technique durability and larger studies with long-term follow-up periods are warranted.

Hypogastric Artery Stenting for Chronic Intermittent Spinal Cord Ischemia After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 801-804
Author(s):  
Catharina Gronert ◽  
Nikolaos Tsilimparis ◽  
Giuseppe Panuccio ◽  
Ahmed Eleshra ◽  
Fiona Rohlffs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Ischemia ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Neurological Symptoms ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Hypogastric Artery ◽  
Lower Extremity Weakness ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
The Right

Purpose: To report a case of chronic intermittent spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and its successful treatment using hypogastric artery stenting. Case Report: A 79-year-old patient presented in May 2013 with a thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) and a contained rupture. He urgently underwent TEVAR that covered 274 mm of descending thoracic aorta without immediate postoperative signs of acute SCI. At 3-month follow-up, he reported repeating incidents of sudden lower extremity weakness leading to a fall with a humerus fracture. A neurological consultation revealed the tentative diagnosis of intermittent SCI caused by TEVAR and initially recommended a conservative approach. During the following year there was no clinical improvement of the symptoms. Computed tomography angiography showed a high-grade stenosis of the right hypogastric artery, which was stented in November 2014 to improve the collateral network of spinal cord perfusion. Following treatment, the patient had no further neurological symptoms; at 32 months after the reintervention, the imaging follow-up documented a patent stent and continued exclusion of the TAA. Conclusion: Intermittent neurological symptoms after TEVAR should be suspected as chronic intermittent SCI. The improvement of collateral networks of the spinal cord by revascularization of the hypogastric artery is a viable treatment option.

Evaluation of Aortic Zone 2 Proximal Landing Accuracy During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Following Carotid-Subclavian Revascularization

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-360
Author(s):  
Sally H. J. Choi ◽  
Gary K. Yang ◽  
Keith Baxter ◽  
Joel Gagnon
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Common Carotid Artery ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Average Distance ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Technical Accuracy ◽  
Corrective Procedures

Background: Adequate seal for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) commonly requires landing in zone 2, but can prove to be challenging due to the tortuous and angulated anatomy of the region. Objectives: Our objective was to determine the proximal landing accuracy of zone 2-targeted TEVARs following carotid-subclavian revascularization (CSR) and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective review of patients that underwent CSR for zone 2 endograft delivery at a tertiary institute between January 2008 and March 2018 was conducted. Technical outcomes were assessed by examining the incidence of intraoperative corrective maneuvers, 1a endoleaks and reinterventions. Distance to target and incidence of LSA stump filling were examined as radiographic markers of landing accuracy. Results: Zone 2-targeted TEVAR with CSR was performed in 53 patients for treatment of dissections (49%), aneurysms (30%) or trauma (21%). Nine (17%) cases required intraoperative corrective procedures: 5 (9%) proximal cuffs due to type 1a endoleak and 4 (8%) left common carotid artery (LCCA) stenting due to inadvertent coverage. Cases performed using higher resolution hybrid fluoroscopy machine compared to mobile C-arm were associated with increased proximal cuff use (OR 8.8; 95% CI 1.2-62.4). Average distance between the proximal edge of the covered graft to LCCA was 8 ± 1 mm and larger distances were not associated with higher rates of 1a endoleak. Twenty-eight (53%) cases of antegrade LSA stump filling were noted on follow-up imaging, but were not associated with higher rates of reinterventions (OR 0.8, 95% CI [0.2-4.6]). Three (6%) patients had a stroke within 30 days and 4 (8%) patients expired within 1 month. Intraoperative corrective maneuvers, post-operative 1a endoleak and reinterventions were not associated with higher rates of stroke or mortality. Conclusion: Using current endografts and imaging modalities, zone 2-targeted TEVARs have suboptimal technical accuracy.

scholarly journals PS50. Hybrid Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) for Complex Aortic Pathology - Early and Mid-term outcomes

2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 42S-44S
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aftab ◽  
Vijay Kamath ◽  
Rajeev Gupta ◽  
Frank Manetta ◽  
Alan Hartman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Pathology

Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (TEVAR) in Patients With Connective Tissue Disorders

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 676-680
Author(s):  
Khalil Qato ◽  
Allan Conway ◽  
Eileen Lu ◽  
Nhan Nguyen Tran ◽  
Gary Giangola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type B ◽  
Connective Tissue Disorders ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Type B Dissection ◽  
Significant Difference

Objectives: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains controversial in patients with connective tissue disorders given the concern for durability. We report on the largest series to date on outcomes of patients with thoracic aortic disease and connective tissue disorders treated with TEVAR. Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative registry identified 12 207 patients treated with TEVAR from January 2010 to December 2018, including 102 with Marfans, Ehlers-Danlos, or Loey-Dietz syndrome. Outcomes were analyzed per the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Results: Median age was 50.6 years (interquartile range: 57.0-75.0), and 62 (60.7%) were male. Eighty-eight (86.3%) patients had Marfan, 9 (8.8%) had Ehlers-Danlos, and 5 (4.9%) had Loey-Dietz syndrome. Twenty-six (25.5%) patients were treated for degenerative aneurysmal disease and 76 (74.5%) patients for type B dissections (33 acute, 31 chronic). Most common indications for interventions in patients with type B dissection were pain (n = 41), aneurysmal degeneration (n = 16), and malperfusion (n = 8), with 3 patients who presented ruptured. There was no significant difference in perioperative complications between acute/chronic dissections and aneurysms ( P = .14). Percutaneous access was utilized in 61.7% of patients, with a 2.9% rate of arterial injury requiring reintervention. Follow-up data were available for 75 (73.3%) patients at a mean follow-up of 15.6 months. Overall mortality was 5.3%. There were 30 patients with follow-up endoleak data, and 8 (26.7%) endoleaks were identified. All endoleaks were in patients treated for acute type B dissection, and all resolved after a mean of 2.1 reinterventions. Three patients treated for acute Type B Aortic Dissection (TBAD) had retrograde dissections requiring intervention. Discussion: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for patients with connective tissue disorders can be performed with low perioperative mortality, spinal cord ischemia, or Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA). On follow-up, acute type B aortic dissections represent a higher risk subgroup with increased rates of endoleak and retrograde dissection. Closer follow-up for these patients and early reintervention may be beneficial.

scholarly journals The surgical management of type IA endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-353
Author(s):  
Yaojun Dun ◽  
Yi Shi ◽  
Hongwei Guo ◽  
Yanxiang Liu ◽  
Xiangyang Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Circulatory Arrest ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Direct Closure ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Type Ia

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our goal was to investigate the surgical strategy for type Ia endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) by reporting our experiences. METHODS From November 2012 to September 2019, a total of 23 patients received surgical management for type Ia endoleak after TEVAR. RESULTS The operations included total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique in 15 patients, direct closure of the endoleak in 2 patients, hybrid aortic arch repair in 4 patients, arch debranching with TEVAR in 1 patient and left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery bypass with TEVAR in 1 patient. Among 21 patients with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), the mean CPB and aortic cross-clamp times were 146.7 ± 42.2 and 81.0 ± 43.3 min, respectively. The selective cerebral perfusion time was 18.8 ± 8.2 min in 17 patients with hypothermic circulatory arrest. The in-hospital mortality was 8.7% (2/23). Type Ia endoleak was sealed successfully after surgery in 95.5% (21/22) of patients. The follow-up data were available for all 21 survivors. The median follow-up period was 18 months (range 1–84 months). During the follow-up period, a total of 8 patients died or had aortic events, including 5 deaths and 6 aortic events. CONCLUSIONS Different surgical strategies could be selected to treat patients with type Ia endoleak after TEVAR, with acceptable early and late outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document