scholarly journals Advancing Personalized Medicine Through the Application of Whole Exome Sequencing and Big Data Analytics

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawel Suwinski ◽  
ChuangKee Ong ◽  
Maurice H. T. Ling ◽  
Yang Ming Poh ◽  
Asif M. Khan ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 161-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Cirillo ◽  
Alfonso Valencia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 637-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen M Boyle ◽  
Brian A Walker ◽  
Christopher P Wardell ◽  
Alexander Murison ◽  
Lorenzo Melchor ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The main genetic features of myeloma identified so far have been the presence of balanced translocations at the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) region and copy number abnormalities. Novel methodologies such as massively parallel sequencing have begun to describe the pattern of tumour acquired mutations detected at presentation but their biological and clinical relevance has not yet been fully established. Methods: Whole exome sequencing was performed on 463 presentation patients enrolled into the large UK, phase III, open label, Myeloma XI trial. DNA was extracted from germline DNA and CD138+ plasma cells and whole exome sequencing was performed using SureSelect (Agilent). In addition to capturing the exome, extra baits were added covering the IGH, IGK, IGL and MYC loci in order to determine the breakpoints associated with translocations in these genes. Tumour and germline DNA were sequenced to a median of 60x and data processed to generate copy number, acquired variants and translocation breakpoints in the tumour. Progression-free and overall survival was measured from initial randomization and median follow up for this analysis was 25 months. These combined data allow us to examine the effect of translocations on the mutational spectra in myeloma and determine any associations with progression-free or overall survival. Results: We identified 15 significantly mutated genes comprising IRF4, KRAS, NRAS, MAX, HIST1H1E, RB1, EGR1, TP53, TRAF3, FAM46C, DIS3, BRAF, LTB, CYLD and FGFR3. By analysing the correlation between mutations and cytogenetic events using a probabilistic approach, we describe the co-segregation of t(11;14) with CCND1 mutations (Corr 0.28,BF=1.5x106 (Bayes Factor)) and t(4;14) with FGFR3 (Corr=0.40, BF=1.12x1014) and PRKD2 mutations (Corr=0.23, BF=3507). The mutational spectrum is dominated by mutations in the RAS (43%) and NF-κB (17%) pathway, however they are prognostically neutral. We describe for the first time in myeloma mutations in genes such as CCND1 and DNA repair pathway alterations (TP53, ATM, ATR and ZFHX4 mutations) that are associated with a negative impact on survival in contrast to those in IRF4 and EGR1 that are associated with a favourable overall-survival. By combining these novel risk factors with the previously described adverse cytogenetic features and ISS we were able to demonstrate in a multivariate analysis the independent prognostic relevance of copy number and structural abnormalities (CNSA) such as del(17p), t(4;14), amp(1q), hyperdiploidy and MYC translocations and mutations in genes such as ATM/ATR, ZFHX4, TP53 and CCND1. We demonstrate that the more adverse features a patient had the worse his outcome was for both PFS (one lesion: HR=1.6, p=0.0012, 2 lesions HR=3.3, p<0.001, 3 lesions HR=15.2, p< 0.001) and for OS (one lesion: HR=2.01, p=0.0032, 2 lesions HR=4.79, p<0.001, 3 lesions HR=9.62, p< 0.001). When combined with ISS, we identified 3 prognostic groups (Group 1: ISS I/II with no CNSA or mutation, Group 2: ISS III with no CNSA or mutation or ISS I/II/III with one CNSA or mutation, Group 3: Two CNSA or mutation regardless of their ISS) thus identifying three distinct prognostic groups with a high risk population representing 13% of patients that both relapsed [median PFS 10.6 months (95% CI 8.7-17.9) versus 27.7 months (95% CI 25.99-31.1), p<0.001] and died prematurely [median overall survival 23.2 months (95% CI 18.2-35.3.) versus not reached, p<0.001] regardless of their ISS score. Finally, we have also identified a list of potentially actionable mutations for which targeted therapy already exists opening the way into personalized medicine in myeloma. Conclusion: We have refined our understanding of genetic events in myeloma and identified clinically relevant mutations that may be used to better stratify patients at presentation. Identifying high risk populations or patients that may benefit from targeted therapy may open the way into personalized medicine for myeloma. Disclosures Walker: Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuangyi Wei

This paper designed a detailed procedure for monogenic hypertension diagnosis by Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) and provided reliable precise medication guidance. Identification of mutated points provides the clinician valuable information for effective individualized therapeutic option. Therapeutic options that specifically restore the pathway disturbed by these point mutations can be selected to give a precise medicinal guidance.  


2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hitz ◽  
S. Al-Turki ◽  
A. Schalinski ◽  
U. Bauer ◽  
T. Pickardt ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasemin Dincer ◽  
Michael Zech ◽  
Matias Wagner ◽  
Nikolai Jung ◽  
Volker Mall ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Dheeraj Kumar Pradhan

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
Thomas Wrona ◽  
Pauline Reinecke

Big Data & Analytics (BDA) ist zu einer kaum hinterfragten Institution für Effizienz und Wettbewerbsvorteil von Unternehmen geworden. Zu viele prominente Beispiele, wie der Erfolg von Google oder Amazon, scheinen die Bedeutung zu bestätigen, die Daten und Algorithmen zur Erlangung von langfristigen Wettbewerbsvorteilen zukommt. Sowohl die Praxis als auch die Wissenschaft scheinen geradezu euphorisch auf den „Datenzug“ aufzuspringen. Wenn Risiken thematisiert werden, dann handelt es sich meist um ethische Fragen. Dabei wird häufig übersehen, dass die diskutierten Vorteile sich primär aus einer operativen Effizienzperspektive ergeben. Strategische Wirkungen werden allenfalls in Bezug auf Geschäftsmodellinnovationen diskutiert, deren tatsächlicher Innovationsgrad noch zu beurteilen ist. Im Folgenden soll gezeigt werden, dass durch BDA zwar Wettbewerbsvorteile erzeugt werden können, dass aber hiermit auch große strategische Risiken verbunden sind, die derzeit kaum beachtet werden.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-277
Author(s):  
Ajay Kumar Bharti ◽  
Neha Verma ◽  
Deepak Kumar Verma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document