scholarly journals Decommissioning Research Needs for Offshore Oil and Gas Infrastructure in Australia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jess Melbourne-Thomas ◽  
Keith R. Hayes ◽  
Alistair J. Hobday ◽  
L. Richard Little ◽  
Joanna Strzelecki ◽  
...  

When offshore oil and gas infrastructure is no longer needed, it is either removed, partially removed, left in place, or left in place but repurposed. These processes are collectively referred to as decommissioning. Australian legislation requires oil and gas companies to develop acceptable plans for the safe removal of all offshore infrastructure at the end of a project’s life. Over the next 50 years, the liability for this decommissioning in Australia is expected to exceed US$45 billion. Unlike countries such as Norway, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, Australian decommissioning activities are in their infancy, with only three cases (to date) in Commonwealth waters where infrastructure has been left in place or partially removed as part of decommissioning. Differences between the Australian marine environment and that of other regions around the world where decommissioning-related research is better progressed include very low sedimentation rates, both tropical and temperate habitats, different species composition, low primary production, and frequent tropical cyclones, as well as unique sociodemographic and cultural characteristics. Accordingly, the outcomes of the decision support tools used in other regions to identify preferred decommissioning options may not be equally applicable in Australia. Here we describe research to support risk and impact assessment for offshore decommissioning in Australia, where full removal of infrastructure is the “base case” regulatory default, but other options including partial removal and/or repurposing might provide similar or better outcomes when environmental, social, economic and seafood safety aspects are considered. Based on our review we propose an integrated framework for research needs to meet legislative requirements for decommissioning and identify research gaps that need to be addressed to inform decision-making for decommissioning in the Australian context.

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-540
Author(s):  
Louise de La Fayette

AbstractIn 1995, Greenpeace International protested the proposed ocean dumping of the offshore installation, Brent Spar. This protest prompted a strong public reaction which in turn led to the recycling of the Brent Spar on land and also to a reconsideration of the relevant legal regime under the OSPAR Convention. In July 1998, the OSPAR Commission meeting at the ministerial level adopted a ban on the disposal of offshore oil and gas installations at sea. Since that time, there have been further developments at the global, regional and national level. This article examines these developments at the OSPAR Commission, at the European Parliament, by the Scientific Group of the London Convention 1972, and in the United Kingdom, which is now implementing the OSPAR decision in its national regulatory regime.


2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 495
Author(s):  
Andrew Taylor ◽  
Stephen Stokes

Improving visibility of when and where oil and gas assets are approaching end of life has provided the foundation for transformation of decommissioning planning and execution around the world. A baseline understanding of decommissioning established by Oil and Gas UK fed into the much lauded Maximising Economic Recovery strategy, and provided a platform for government to pursue a 35% cost reduction target for decommissioning in the United Kingdom. In the Netherlands, one of the first four priorities pursued to maximise value through decommissioning was the establishment of a national decommissioning database, which aimed to create an integrated view of decommissioning scope and timelines. In 2020, funded by NERA and a group of seven operators, Advisian delivered the first operator-supported assessment of Australia's decommissioning liability and outlook. This outlook lays the foundation for initiatives that support knowledge sharing, service sector engagement, collaboration, technology development, efficiency and reduced stakeholder burden. This joint presentation by NERA and Advisian will provide an overview of NERA's decommissioning strategy and the data that underpins this strategy, the Advisian ‘Offshore Oil and Gas Decommissioning Liability' assessment for Australia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document