scholarly journals Microvascular Structure Changes After Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injection in Retinal Vein Occlusion Patients With and Without Macular Ischemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyi Zhu ◽  
Yongan Meng ◽  
Igor Kozak ◽  
Manyun Xie ◽  
Youling Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Foveal Avascular Zone ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Structure Changes ◽  
Ischemia Group ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Macular Ischemia

Purpose: To investigate the changes in the macular microvascular structure after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patients with and without macular ischemia.Methods: A total of 39 patients were divided into the macular ischemia group (n = 22) and the nonischemia group (n = 17) at baseline. All the patients received an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with a 3+ pro re nata (PRN) regimen. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) areas, macular vessel density (VD), and macular ischemic index (ISI) were evaluated at baseline and 3 and 6 months after treatment.Results: After treatment, some patients in the macular ischemia group achieved obvious reperfusion in macular nonperfusion areas. The VD and macular ISI improved in RVO patients, but the changes in VD and macular ISI were different in the two groups. The improvement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was positively correlated with the improvement of macular perfusion status. Macular perfusion remained stable in most patients in RVO and only one patient had macular ischemia aggravation.Conclusion: The macular microvascular structures were stable in most RVO patients after anti-VEGF treatment. At the same time, some patients with macular ischemia presented reperfusion in macular nonperfusion areas, and still a few patients presented aggravated macular ischemia. Macular ISI is a good way to evaluate macular perfusion status in RVO compared to VD.

Long-Term Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Therapy in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 298-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Young ◽  
Karen M. Wai ◽  
Fabiana Q. Silva ◽  
Felipe F. Conti ◽  
Sunil K. Srivastava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Central Subfield Thickness ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose: To evaluate long-term visual and anatomical outcomes of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in routine clinical practice. Methods: Patients with ME secondary to hemi-RVO (HRVO), central RVO (CRVO), or branch RVO (BRVO) after initiating anti-VEGF therapy were followed for at least 36 months. Main outcomes were change in best visual acuity (BVA) and mean absolute change in central subfield thickness (CST) at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months. Results: Patients with BRVO showed significant increases in BVA that were maintained after 12, 24, 36, and 48 months (+11.03, +12.06, +10.71, and +9.26 letters, respectively; P < .05). CST significantly decreased after 12, 24, 36, and 48 months (−83.51, −67.93, −97.52, −127.85 µm, respectively; P < .05). In patients with CRVO/HRVO, significant improvements in BVA were seen at 12 and 24 months (+9.39 and +8.54 letters, respectively; P = .023). At 36 and 48 months, the visual gain was not significant (+2.64 and +3.42 letters, respectively; P > .05). For CST changes, there were significant decreases at 12, 24, and 36 months (−146.23, −149.54, and −166.44 µm, respectively; P < .05). At 48 months (−97.66 µm, P = .130), changes in CST were not significant. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, visual and anatomical benefits of anti-VEGF agents in patients with BRVO were sustained at 36 and 48 months. For patients with CRVO/HRVO, anatomical improvements were maintained for 36, but not 48 months, while visual improvements were no longer maintained by 36 months.

scholarly journals Five-year outcomes of retinal vein occlusion treated with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Spooner ◽  
Samantha Fraser-Bell ◽  
Thomas Hong ◽  
Andrew A Chang
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Macular Oedema ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Fundus Fluorescein Angiography ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

PurposeReport 5-year outcomes of patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for the treatment of macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO.MethodsRetrospective review of eyes with RVO which initiated anti-VEGF treatment. Data including age, gender, visual acuity (VA) and injection numbers were obtained from medical records. Optical coherence tomography scans were graded for presence or absence of macular oedema and central foveal thickness (CFT). Macular perfusion was assessed on fundus fluorescein angiography by masked graders.Results68 eyes (31 branch RVO, BRVO; 35 central RVO, CRVO and 2 hemi-RVO) with 5 years of follow-up after initiation of anti-VEGF treatment. Mean change in VA at 5 years was + 9.6 ± 21.6 letters among CRVO eyes and + 14.2 ± 15.6 letters among eyes with BRVO (p=0.001). Vision of 20/40 or better was achieved in 65 % of treated eyes. The proportion of eyes with a three-line improvement of vision (15 letters) at 5 years was 22 %. Mean CFT decreased by 257.6 ± 249.8 µm in eyes with CRVO and 145.6 ± 143.3 µm in eyes with BRVO.ConclusionThe results confirm good long-term outcomes can be achieved with anti-VEGF therapy for RVO.

scholarly journals Effect of Alternate Treatment with Intravitreal Corticosteroid and Anti-VEGF for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Young Hwan Bae ◽  
Seong Mi Kim ◽  
Jin Young Kim ◽  
So Hyun Bae ◽  
Hakyoung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose. To evaluate whether treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections alternately can improve treatment outcomes of macular edema (ME) caused by retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods. This dual-center retrospective study included 112 eyes with treatment-naïve ME secondary to RVO that were alternately treated with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections (33 eyes, alternate group) or treated only with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (79 eyes, anti-VEGF group) on a pro re nata basis. Results. During the 12-month follow-up period, the alternate group achieved a visual acuity gain of 0.39 logMAR, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a gain of 0.21 logMAR ( P = 0.042 ). The alternate group demonstrated a reduction in the central macular thickness of 229.9-μm, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a reduction of 220.1 μm ( P = 0.887 ). The alternate group required an average of 5.2 injections, while the anti-VEGF received 4.2 injections ( P < 0.001 ). In a propensity score-matched cohort to compensate for the differences in the injection numbers between the two groups, the alternate group achieved a better visual acuity gain than the anti-VEGF group at month 12 (0.39 logMAR vs. 0.17 logMAR, P = 0.048 ). Conclusions. In ME secondary to RVO, treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections alternately resulted in a more favorable visual outcome compared with intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy.

Change of cytokines after intravitreal ranibizumab in patients with recurrent branch retinal vein occlusion and macular edema

2019 ◽  
pp. 112067211988505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidetaka Noma ◽  
Kanako Yasuda ◽  
Masahiko Shimura
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose: To investigate the relations of vascular endothelial growth factor, growth factors, soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and inflammatory factors to recurrence of macular edema after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion. Methods: This study retrospectively investigated 17 patients with branch retinal vein occlusion who received intravitreal ranibizumab injection three times within 6 months for recurrent macular edema. Aqueous humor samples were obtained from these patients at every recurrence. Levels of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, placental growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor-AA, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-12(p70), and interleukin-13 were measured by the suspension array method. Aqueous flare values were measured with a laser flare meter and central macular thickness was determined by optical coherence tomography. Results: Mean best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness improved significantly over time after intravitreal ranibizumab injection, but the aqueous flare value at recurrence after intravitreal ranibizumab injection showed no significant change compared with baseline. Aqueous humor levels of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor-AA, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and interleukin-8 decreased significantly over time after intravitreal ranibizumab injection. However, there were no significant changes of the other five factors/cytokines (placental growth factor, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, interleukin-6, interleukin-12, and interleukin-13) at recurrence after intravitreal ranibizumab injection compared with baseline. Conclusion: These findings suggest that persistent inflammation may influence the recurrence of macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion patients, and that adding steroid therapy might be an effective strategy for preventing recurrence.

scholarly journals Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection and Treatment Regimens in Macular Edema due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

2019 ◽  
pp. 92-98
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Intravitreal Aflibercept ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is the most common form of retinal vein occlusions (RVO), which is the second most common retinal vascular disease after diabetic retinopathy. The most common cause of visual loss in BRVO is macular edema. Since the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was detected in the pathogenesis of macular edema due to BRVO, studies have been made with available anti-VEGF agents and different treatment regimens. Those treatment regimens can be listed as; monthly / bi-monthly fixed interval, as needed (Pro Re Nata; PRN), treat and extend (T&E). Aflibercept acts as a decoy receptor that binds to VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and placental growth factor. There are publications indicating that this agent binds VEGF with a higher affinity than other anti-VEGF agents and thus provides a longer treatment efficacy. This review summarizes the studies about the use of aflibercept in different regimens for the treatment of macular edema due to BRVO.

scholarly journals Cytokines and the Pathogenesis of Macular Edema in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidetaka Noma ◽  
Kanako Yasuda ◽  
Masahiko Shimura
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Intraocular Injection ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Lifestyle Related Diseases ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is a very common retinal vascular problem in patients with lifestyle-related diseases, such as hypertension and arteriosclerosis. In patients with BRVO, development of macular edema is the main cause of visual impairment. BRVO is still a controversial condition in many respects. Over the years, various methods such as laser photocoagulation have been tried to treat macular edema associated with BRVO, but the results were not satisfactory. After vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was found to have an important role in the pathogenesis of macular edema in BRVO patients, treatment of this condition was revolutionized by development of anti-VEGF therapy. Although macular edema improves dramatically following intraocular injection of anti-VEGF agents, repeated recurrence and resistance of edema is a major problem in some BRVO patients. This suggests that factors or cytokines other than VEGF may be associated with inflammation and retinal hypoxia in BRVO and that the pathogenesis of macular edema is complicated. The present review assesses the role of various factors and cytokines in the pathogenesis of macular edema associated with BRVO. We present a mechanism that is not only plausible but should also be useful for developing new therapeutic strategies.

scholarly journals Treatment of Macular Edema in Vascular Retinal Diseases: A 2021 Update

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5300
Author(s):  
Andrzej Grzybowski ◽  
Agne Markeviciute ◽  
Reda Zemaitiene
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Retinal Diseases ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Near Future

Macular edema (ME) is associated with various conditions; however, the main causes of ME are retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and diabetes. Laser photocoagulation, formerly the gold standard for the treatment of ME, has been replaced by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injections. Despite its efficiency, this treatment requires frequent injections to preserve the outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy, and as many patients do not sufficiently respond to the treatment, ME is typically a chronic condition that can lead to permanent visual impairment. Generalized recommendations for the treatment of ME are lacking, which highlights the importance of reviewing treatment approaches, including recent anti-VEGFs, intravitreal steroid implants, and subthreshold micropulse lasers. We reviewed relevant studies, emphasizing the articles published between 2019 and 2021 and using the following keywords: macular edema, diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, laser photocoagulation, anti-VEGF, and intravitreal injections. Our results revealed that a combination of different treatment methods may be beneficial in resistant cases. Additionally, artificial intelligence (AI) is likely to help select the best treatment option for patients in the near future.

scholarly journals Retinal venous pressure is decreased after anti-VEGF therapy in patients with retinal vein occlusion–related macular edema

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teruyo Kida ◽  
Josef Flammer ◽  
Katarzyna Konieczka ◽  
Tsunehiko Ikeda
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Injection ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Decisive Role ◽  
Retinal Venous Pressure ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Abstract Purpose The pathomechanism leading to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is unclear. Mechanical compression, thrombosis, and functional contractions of veins are discussed as the reasons for the increased resistance of venous outflow. We evaluated changes in the retinal venous pressure (RVP) following intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent to determine the effect on RVO-related macular edema. Methods Twenty-six patients with RVO-related macular edema (16 branch RVOs [BRVOs] and 10 central RVOs [CRVOs], age 72.5 ± 8.8 years) who visited our hospital were included in this prospective study. Visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central retinal thickness (CRT) determined by macular optical coherence tomography, and RVP measured using an ophthalmodynamometer were obtained before intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) and 1 month later. Results Comparison of the BRVOs and CRVOs showed that VA was significantly improved by a single injection in BRVOs (P < 0.0001; P = 0.1087 for CRVOs), but CRT and RVP were significantly decreased without significant difference in IOP after the treatment in both groups (P < 0.0001). Conclusion The anti-VEGF treatment resulted in a significant decrease in the RVP, but the RVP remained significantly higher than the IOP. An increased RVP plays a decisive role in the formation of macula edema, and reducing it is desirable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document