scholarly journals Growth Promotion and Disease Suppression Ability of a Streptomyces sp. CB-75 from Banana Rhizosphere Soil

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yufeng Chen ◽  
Dengbo Zhou ◽  
Dengfeng Qi ◽  
Zhufen Gao ◽  
Jianghui Xie ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
pp. 525-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Velivelli ◽  
E. O'Herlihy ◽  
B. Janczura ◽  
B. Doyle Prestwich ◽  
J. Ghyselinck ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 806-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jahanara Akter ◽  
Rayhanur Jannat ◽  
Md. Motaher Hossain ◽  
Jalal Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Md. Tanbir Rubayet

Author(s):  
Rishi Kumar Verma ◽  
Manisha Sachan ◽  
Kanchan Vishwakarma ◽  
Neha Upadhyay ◽  
Rohit Kumar Mishra ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 792-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Hariprasad ◽  
S. Chandrashekar ◽  
S. Brijesh Singh ◽  
S. R. Niranjana

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragana Miljaković ◽  
Jelena Marinković ◽  
Svetlana Balešević-Tubić

Bacillus spp. produce a variety of compounds involved in the biocontrol of plant pathogens and promotion of plant growth, which makes them potential candidates for most agricultural and biotechnological applications. Bacilli exhibit antagonistic activity by excreting extracellular metabolites such as antibiotics, cell wall hydrolases, and siderophores. Additionally, Bacillus spp. improve plant response to pathogen attack by triggering induced systemic resistance (ISR). Besides being the most promising biocontrol agents, Bacillus spp. promote plant growth via nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, and phytohormone production. Antagonistic and plant growth-promoting strains of Bacillus spp. might be useful in formulating new preparations. Numerous studies of a wide range of plant species revealed a steady increase in the number of Bacillus spp. identified as potential biocontrol agents and plant growth promoters. Among different mechanisms of action, it remains unclear which individual or combined traits could be used as predictors in the selection of the best strains for crop productivity improvement. Due to numerous factors that influence the successful application of Bacillus spp., it is necessary to understand how different strains function in biological control and plant growth promotion, and distinctly define the factors that contribute to their more efficient use in the field.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 330-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Moo Lee ◽  
Hyun Gi Kong ◽  
Geun Cheol Song ◽  
Choong-Min Ryu

AbstractEnrichment of protective microbiota in the rhizosphere facilitates disease suppression. However, how the disruption of protective rhizobacteria affects disease suppression is largely unknown. Here, we analyzed the rhizosphere microbial community of a healthy and diseased tomato plant grown <30-cm apart in a greenhouse at three different locations in South Korea. The abundance of Gram-positive Actinobacteria and Firmicutes phyla was lower in diseased rhizosphere soil (DRS) than in healthy rhizosphere soil (HRS) without changes in the causative Ralstonia solanacearum population. Artificial disruption of Gram-positive bacteria in HRS using 500-μg/mL vancomycin increased bacterial wilt occurrence in tomato. To identify HRS-specific and plant-protective Gram-positive bacteria species, Brevibacterium frigoritolerans HRS1, Bacillus niacini HRS2, Solibacillus silvestris HRS3, and Bacillus luciferensis HRS4 were selected from among 326 heat-stable culturable bacteria isolates. These four strains did not directly antagonize R. solanacearum but activated plant immunity. A synthetic community comprising these four strains displayed greater immune activation against R. solanacearum and extended plant protection by 4 more days in comparison with each individual strain. Overall, our results demonstrate for the first time that dysbiosis of the protective Gram-positive bacterial community in DRS promotes the incidence of disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document