scholarly journals Drug-Coated Balloons for the Treatment of Symptomatic Intracranial High-Grade Stenosis: A Review of the Current Rationale

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Gruber ◽  
Samarth Singh ◽  
Lukas Andereggen ◽  
Jatta Berberat ◽  
Luca Remonda
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Interventional Cardiology ◽  
Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Benefits ◽  
Best Medical Treatment ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Angioplasty And Stenting ◽  
Percutaneous Transluminal

Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD) remains a challenging disorder in the neurovascular field. Despite best medical treatment, the recurrence rate for stroke remains high in patients with intracranial high-grade stenosis (>70–99%). Furthermore, two large randomized trials (SAMMPRIS and VISSIT) failed to prove the efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in patients with sICAD. Drug-coated balloon percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (DCB-PTA) represents an alternative treatment modality with therapeutic benefits for interventional cardiology. However, there are very few articles in the existing literature that relate to the use of DCB-PTA in sICAD patients. Here, we aimed to review the rationale underlying the use of DCB-PTA in sICAD patients and summarize recent developments in the neurovascular field.

scholarly journals Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for recurrent carotid artery stenosis

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. E7
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Robert A. Mericle ◽  
Demetrius K. Lopes ◽  
Ajay K. Wakhloo ◽  
Lee R. Guterman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Cardiac Complications ◽  
Neurological Event ◽  
Angioplasty And Stenting ◽  
Percutaneous Transluminal

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting has recently been proposed as an alternative to surgical reexploration in patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy. The authors retrospectively reviewed their experience after performing 25 procedures in 21 patients to assess the safety and efficacy of PTA with or without stenting for carotid artery restenosis. The mean interval between endarterectomy and the endovascular procedure was 57 months (range 8-220 months). Seven arteries in five patients were treated by PTA alone (including bilateral procedures in one patient and repeated angioplasty in the same vessel in another). Early suboptimum results and recurrent stenosis in some of these initial cases prompted the authors to combine PTA with stenting in the treatment of 18 arteries over the past 3 years. No major periprocedural deficits (neurological or cardiac complications) or death occurred. There was one periprocedural transient neurological event. A pseudoaneurysm of the femoral artery (at the access site) required surgical repair. In the 16 patients who each underwent at least 6 months of follow-up review, no neurological events ipsilateral to the treated artery had occurred after a mean follow-up period of 27 months (range 6-57 months). Three of five patients who underwent PTA alone developed significant (> 50%) asymptomatic restenoses that required repeated angioplasty in one and PTA with stenting in two patients. Significant restenosis (55%) was observed in only one of the vessels treated by combined angioplasty with stenting. Endovascular PTA and stenting of recurrent carotid artery stenosis is both technically feasible and safe and has a satisfactory midterm patency. This procedure can be considered a viable alternative to surgical reexploration in patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document