scholarly journals Chemoradiotherapy Is Inferior to Chemotherapy Alone in Adjuvant Setting for Signet Ring Cell Containing Gastric Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue-Ting Zhu ◽  
Xin-Zu Chen ◽  
Ye Chen ◽  
Yu-Wen Zhou ◽  
Lian-Sha Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Signet Ring Cell ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Signet Ring Cells ◽  
D2 Gastrectomy ◽  
Vessel Invasion ◽  
Signet Ring ◽  
Ring Cell

BackgroundSignet ring cell containing gastric cancer (SRCGC) is a rare subtype of gastric cancer, and its adjuvant therapy is based on general gastric cancer. However, the effectiveness of radiotherapy for those SRCGC patients remains unknown.PurposeThe purpose of the study was to analyze whether the addition of radiotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) can benefit survival in resected SRCGC patients.MethodsPatients with SRCGC, who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT), were retrospectively collected. According to the proportion of signet ring cells, patients were histologically classified as pure SRCGC (pSRCGC) containing 100% of signet ring cells, mixed SRCGC (mSRCGC) containing >50% of signet ring cells, and contaminated SRCGC (cSRCGC) containing <50% of signet ring cells. Among the 272 patients, 156 were treated by CT alone and 116 by CRT. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival rate (3-year OS rate).ResultsWith a median follow-up of 80.5 months, the 3-year OS rate was significantly higher in the CT group (70.5% vs. 58.6%, HR = 0.633, P = 0.017) compared with CRT group. Three independent characteristics were predictive of a poor overall survival: CRT treatment (P = 0.019), tumor size ≥5 cm (P < 0.001), and the presence of vessel invasion (P = 0.009). Subgroup analyses showed CRT significantly impaired prognosis in SRCGC patients in the cSRCGC subset, as well as lesions located in lower-middle sites, subtotal gastrectomy, male, <60 year, and no vessel invasion. Peritoneal was the most common recurrence site in SRCGC patients. The adverse events leukopenia and neutropenia were more common in the CRT group (P = 0.007).ConclusionsAdjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with poor survival compared with adjuvant chemotherapy in SRCGC patients with D2 gastrectomy.

scholarly journals Incidence and Prognostic significance of Signet Ring Cell Histology in Gastric Cancer. A cross sectional study from Turkey: Pure Signet Ring Cell Histology in Gastric Cancer

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Signet Ring Cell ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Signet Ring ◽  
Ring Cell

Purpose: The present study aims to evaluate the incidence of signet ring cell (SRC) histology in patients with gastric cancer and its prognostic significance on the disease stage. Methods: Between November 2006 and September 2019, 309 patients were reviewed retrospectively in Kartal Koşuyolu High Specialization Training and Research Hospital Gastroenterology Surgery clinic in Turkey and the clinicopathological features and survival status were examined in the presence of ring cell histology. Results: Of the patients, 71.4% had gastric cancer with a non-SRC histology and 28.6% had an SRC histology. The presence of an SRC histology was found to be associated with young age (p=0.007), advanced depth of wall invasion (p=0.001), number of positive lymph nodes (p=0.022) and presence of vascular invasion (p=0.044). The presence of an SRC histology was associated with good prognosis in patients with stage I gastric cancer (p=0.045), but with poor prognosis in patients with stage III disease (p=0.034). The study found no significant association between stage II disease and overall survival. Conclusions: The present study found survival to be associated with good prognosis in stage I, and poor prognosis in stage III among patients with gastric cancer with SRC histology. No prognostic significance could be established for overall survival.

The effects of combined modality therapy on stage II-III primary gastric signet ring cell carcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16530-e16530
Author(s):  
Yang Li ◽  
Yantao Tian ◽  
Zhikai Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Combined Modality Therapy ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Signet Ring Cell ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Ajcc Stage ◽  
Signet Ring ◽  
Ring Cell

e16530 Background: To date, there is no well-defined standard of care for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC). Clinical guidelines support that combined modality therapy (CMT) on localized gastric cancer, but this may not be appropriate for GSRC as it was generally found to be chemo-resistant. We conducted a population-based study to examine the effects of therapeutic strategies on survival outcomes by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. Methods: Analyses included primary GSRC patients with stage II-III who survived more than 6 months, and were diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 from SEER data.CMT were categorized as gastrectomy group, adjuvant CT group (gastrectomy with adjuvant chemotherapy), neoadjuvant RT group (gastrectomy with neoadjuvant radiotherapy combined adjuvant chemotherapy), and adjuvant CRT group (gastrectomy with chemoradiotherapy). Survival analyses were conducted by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, gender, race, marital status, histology, AJCC stage, tumor location, and lymph nodes removed. Models were stratified by gender, AJCC stage, lymph nodes removed and tumor location. Results: Of the 1,717 cases of stage II-III primary GSRC, the mean age was 66.9 (SD: 11.0) years, over a half were male (52.8%), and the majority were white (66.0%). A total of 39.9% received adjuvant CRT. The five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 34.6% for this treatment, and 29.6% for adjuvant CT group, 25.4% for adjuvant CRT group, only 23.8% for the gastrectomy group. The median OS of patients treated with adjuvant CRT was significantly longer than that of the gastrectomy group (33 vs 24 months, aHR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.60,0.84). Although the crude model showed a significant association between adjuvant CT and total survival (cHR = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.68,0.96), the effect measure turned null in the multivariable and sub-group analysis. Independent prognostic factors were adjuvant CRT, ≥60 years old, AJCC stage, and > 20 lymoh nodes removed. Conclusions: In this study, GSRC patients with stage II-III experienced improved overall survival after receiving adjuvant CRT, which provides several treatment implications. Future clinical trials considering adjuvant CRT will be needed to verify the conclusion derived from this study.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Analysis of Patients With Signet Ring Cell Gastric Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153303382098381
Author(s):  
Jia Mi Yu ◽  
Zhou Wei Zhan ◽  
Jing Xian Zhen ◽  
Xiao Jie Wang ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Signet Ring Cell ◽  
Signet Ring ◽  
Ring Cell

We do not know the clinical and prognostic factors that influence the survival of patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC). Therefore, a retrospective review was undertaken of 219 patients with SRC who had undergone gastrectomy between January 2009 and December 2012 in our hospital. Patient age, sex, TNM stage, vessel carcinoma embolus, perineural invasion, tumor site and operation type, postoperative chemotherapy, and five-year overall survival were recorded and evaluated. In our study, 93 cases (42.5%) were signet ring cell carcinoma only, and 126 cases (57.5%) were signet ring cell carcinoma coexisting with other components (such as adenocarcinoma or mucus adenocarcinoma). Eighty-three patients were female, 136 were male, 46 occurred at the gastroesophageal junction (21.0%), 63 at the fundus/body (28.8%), 80 were antrum/pylorus (36.5%), and 30 were whole stomach (13.7%). The prognosis of gastric antrum/ pylorus cancer was the best (P < 0.05). There were 133 patients (60.7%) with stage III, and the single factor analysis showed that the earlier the stage, the better the prognosis. The overall five-year survival rate was 30.1% in all patients. One-hundred and 41 patients (64.4%) received D2 radical surgery, 64 (29.2%) received D1 radical operation, and 14 (6.4%) received palliative resection, and the patients who received D2 had the best overall survival (P < 0.05). The survival time of the paclitaxel-based regimen in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy tended to be prolonged. There was no statistical difference in overall survival between the percentage of signet-ring cells and sex. In summary, age, tumor stage, and surgical resection combined with D2 lymphadenectomy were independent prognostic factors for SRC. Adjuvant chemotherapy with a paclitaxel-based regimen may improve the survival of patients with SRC.

Partial Gastrectomy is Associated with Improved Overall Survival in Signet-ring Cell Gastric Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 266 ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Maitham A. Moslim ◽  
Elizabeth Handorf ◽  
Sanjay S. Reddy ◽  
Stephanie H. Greco ◽  
Jeffrey M. Farma
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Partial Gastrectomy ◽  
Signet Ring Cell ◽  
Signet Ring ◽  
Ring Cell

scholarly journals Clinical Significance of coexisting histological diffuse type in stage II/III gastric cancer: A retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Tanaka ◽  
Mami Yoshii ◽  
Yuichiro Miki ◽  
Tatsuro Tamura ◽  
Takahiro Toyokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Signet Ring Cell ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Intestinal Type ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Diffuse Type ◽  
Signet Ring ◽  
Ring Cell

Abstract Background: Since 1965, the Laurén classification has been used most commonly for gastric adenocarcinoma, with two types, intestinal type and diffuse type. Signet ring cell carcinoma (Sig) and non-solid poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (Por2) are the histological forms of diffuse type and are often found in advanced tumors, and they seem to be associated with a poor prognosis. S-1 based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III gastric cancer has generally been accepted in Japan, but histological type does not alter treatment strategy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the histopathologic mixture of Sig and Por2 in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer treated with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.Methods: The clinicopathological data of 968 gastric carcinoma patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2007 and 2016 at our department were retrospectively analyzed. In this study, tumors containing Sig or Por2 were classified as Diffuse type, and those not containing them were classified as Intestinal type.Results: There were 307 cases of Diffuse type and 661 of Intestinal type. Diffuse type included 189 cases with Sig. Pathological diagnosis of Sig was an independent risk factor for peritoneal recurrence in patients with stage II/III. Patients with Diffuse type had worse overall survival than those with Intestinal type in Stage III. Of the patients who received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, the prognosis of Stage III patients with Sig but not Por2 was Significantly worse compared to patients with Intestinal type.Conclusions: The coexistence of Signet ring cell carcinoma in the primary tumor was associated with a poor prognosis in patients with stage III gastric cancer. These findings suggest that, because mixed Sig gastric cancer had a high risk of peritoneal recurrence even if adjuvant chemotherapy were performed, the pathological diagnosis should be considered when determining the therapeutic strategy for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer.

scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of Signet Ring Cells in Gastric Cancer: The Higher Proportion, The Better Survival

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Li ◽  
Yuxin Zhong ◽  
Quan Xu ◽  
Zhikai Zhu ◽  
Yantao Tian
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Signet Ring Cell ◽  
Cell Group ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Signet Ring Cells ◽  
Signet Ring ◽  
Ring Cell

BackgroundDue to the fact that the definition of gastric signet ring cell cancer (GSRC) was still controversial in the past decades, the prognosis affected by the proportion of signet ring cells within gastric cancer is uncertain. This study compared the clinicopathological features and prognosis of GSRC with the various proportions of signet ring cells.MethodsWe collected GSRC cases without metastasis who underwent curative (R0) resection between 2011 and 2018. Individuals who were in the low-proportion signet ring cell group (LSRC, &lt;50%) were matched to those who were in the high-proportion signet ring cell group (HSRC, &gt;50%) through propensity score matching (1:1). We used Cox proportional hazard regression to calculate the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and explored interactions with gender and stage.ResultsWe had 1:1 matched individuals including 231 cases from the LSRC group and 231 cases from the HSRC group. Patients with HSRC had a significantly higher overall survival rate in the multivariable model (aHR = 0.56, 95%CI = 0.38, 0.84) compared with those with LSRC. The association of HSRC appeared to be more substantial among individuals at early stage and N0 stage (p-interaction &lt; 0.01).ConclusionsThis study confirms that GSRC with different proportions of signet ring cells could affect the survival of the patient. Further clinical studies should be developed in the future to provide an appropriate treatment strategy for GSRC.

scholarly journals Transcriptome Analysis and the Prognostic Role of NUDC in Diffuse and Intestinal Gastric Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110195
Author(s):  
Sang-Ho Jeong ◽  
Miyeong Park ◽  
Sun Yi Park ◽  
Jiho Park ◽  
Tae-Han Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Signet Ring Cell ◽  
Negative Group ◽  
Diffuse Type ◽  
Prognostic Role ◽  
Cancer Driver ◽  
Signet Ring ◽  
Ring Cell ◽  
Variant Analysis ◽  
Well Differentiated

Introduction: There have been few studies about gene differences between patients with diffuse-type gastric cancer and those with intestinal-type gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the transcriptomes of signet ring cell gastric cancer (worst prognosis in diffuse-type) and well-differentiated gastric cancer (best prognosis in intestinal-type); NUDC was identified, and its prognostic role was studied. Materials and Methods: We performed next-generation sequencing with 5 well-differentiated gastric cancers and 3 of signet ring cell gastric cancer surgical samples. We performed gene enrichment and functional annotation analysis using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery bioinformatics resources. Immunohistochemistry was used to validate NUDC expression. Results: Overall, 900 genes showed significantly higher expression, 644 genes showed lower expression in signet ring cell gastric cancer than in well-differentiated gastric cancers, and there was a large difference in adhesion, vascular development, and cell-to-cell junction components between the 2 subtypes. We performed variant analysis and found 52 variants and 30 cancer driver genes, including NUDC. We analyzed NUDC expression in gastric cancer tissue and its relationship with prognosis. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified T stage, N stage, and NUDC expression as independent risk factors for survival ( P < 0.05). The overall survival of the NUDC-positive group was significantly higher (53.2 ± 0.92 months) than that of the NUDC-negative group (44.6 ± 3.7 months) ( P = 0.001) in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Conclusion: We found 30 cancer driver gene candidates and found that the NUDC-positive group showed significantly better survival than the NUDC-negative group via variant analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document