scholarly journals In Silico Prediction and Insights Into the Structural Basis of Drug Induced Nephrotoxicity

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinping Shi ◽  
Yuqing Hua ◽  
Baobao Wang ◽  
Ruiqiu Zhang ◽  
Xiao Li

Drug induced nephrotoxicity is a major clinical challenge, and it is always associated with higher costs for the pharmaceutical industry and due to detection during the late stages of drug development. It is desirable for improving the health outcomes for patients to distinguish nephrotoxic structures at an early stage of drug development. In this study, we focused on in silico prediction and insights into the structural basis of drug induced nephrotoxicity, based on reliable data on human nephrotoxicity. We collected 565 diverse chemical structures, including 287 nephrotoxic drugs on humans in the real world, and 278 non-nephrotoxic approved drugs. Several different machine learning and deep learning algorithms were employed for in silico model building. Then, a consensus model was developed based on three best individual models (RFR_QNPR, XGBOOST_QNPR, and CNF). The consensus model performed much better than individual models on internal validation and it achieved prediction accuracy of 86.24% external validation. The results of analysis of molecular properties differences between nephrotoxic and non-nephrotoxic structures indicated that several key molecular properties differ significantly, including molecular weight (MW), molecular polar surface area (MPSA), AlogP, number of hydrogen bond acceptors (nHBA), molecular solubility (LogS), the number of rotatable bonds (nRotB), and the number of aromatic rings (nAR). These molecular properties may be able to play an important part in the identification of nephrotoxic chemicals. Finally, 87 structural alerts for chemical nephrotoxicity were mined with f-score and positive rate analysis of substructures from Klekota-Roth fingerprint (KRFP). These structural alerts can well identify nephrotoxic drug structures in the data set. The in silico models and the structural alerts could be freely accessed via https://ochem.eu/article/140251 and http://www.sapredictor.cn, respectively. We hope the results should provide useful tools for early nephrotoxicity estimation in drug development.

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1224-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueyan Cui ◽  
Juan Liu ◽  
Jinfeng Zhang ◽  
Qiuyun Wu ◽  
Xiao Li

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Chikowe ◽  
Alfred Chipanda Phiri ◽  
Kirios Patrick Mbewe ◽  
Dunstan Matekenya

Abstract Background Drug-induced toxicity is one of the problems that have negatively impacted on the well-being of populations throughout the world, including Malawi. It results in unnecessary hospitalizations, retarding the development of the country. This study assessed the Malawi Essential Medicines List (MEML) for structural alerts and reactive metabolites with the potential for drug-induced toxicities. Methods This in-silico screening study used StopTox, ToxAlerts and LD-50 values toxicity models to assess the MEML drugs. A total of 296 drugs qualified for the analysis (those that had defined chemical structures) and were screened in each software programme. Each model had its own toxicity endpoints and the models were compared for consensus of their results. Results In the StopTox model, 86% of the drugs had potential to cause at least one toxicity including 55% that had the potential of causing eye irritation and corrosion. In ToxAlerts, 90% of the drugs had the potential of causing at least one toxicity and 72% were found to be potentially reactive, unstable and toxic. In LD-50, 70% of the drugs were potentially toxic. Model consensus evaluation results showed that the highest consensus was observed between ToxAlerts and StopTox (80%). The overall consensus amongst the three models was 57% and statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions A large number of drugs had the potential to cause various systemic toxicities. But the results need to be interpreted cautiously since the clinical translation of QSAR-based predictions depends on many factors. In addition, inconsistencies have been reported between screening results amongst different models.


2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 2077-2081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Hansen ◽  
Sebastian Mika ◽  
Timon Schroeter ◽  
Andreas Sutter ◽  
Antonius ter Laak ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 1047-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Gomeni ◽  
Christine Falcoz ◽  
Carla D’angeli ◽  
Alan Bye

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document