scholarly journals Working Memory Load Effects on the Tilt Aftereffect

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaoxing Mei ◽  
Mofen Cen ◽  
Xu Luo ◽  
Shiming Qiu ◽  
Yun Pan

Prolonged exposure to an oriented stimulus causes a subsequent test stimulus to be perceived as tilted in the opposite direction, a phenomenon referred to as the tilt aftereffect (TAE). Previous studies have demonstrated that high-level cognitive functions such as attention can modulate the TAE, which is generally well-known as a low-level perceptual process. However, it is unclear whether working memory load, another high-level cognitive function, could modulate the TAE. To address this issue, here we developed a new paradigm by combining a working memory load task with a TAE task. Participants firstly remembered a stream of digits (Experiment 1) or four color-shape conjunctions (Experiment 2) under high/low load conditions, and then recognized the probe stimuli (digits or a color-shape conjunction), which were presented at the center of an adapting grating. After the recognition task (i.e., the adaptation stage), participants performed an orientation judgment task to measure their TAEs. The result of Experiment 1, where the load stimuli were digits, showed that the magnitude of the TAEs were reduced under the condition of the high working memory load compared to that of the low working memory load. However, we failed to replicate the finding in Experiment 2, where the load stimuli were color-shape conjunctions. Together, our two experiments provided mixed evidence regarding the working memory load effects on the TAE and further replications are needed in future work.

2021 ◽  
pp. 174702182110263
Author(s):  
Philippe Blondé ◽  
Marco Sperduti ◽  
Dominique Makowski ◽  
Pascale Piolino

Mind wandering, defined as focusing attention toward task unrelated thoughts, is a common mental state known to impair memory encoding. This phenomenon is closely linked to boredom. Very few studies, however, have tested the potential impact of boredom on memory encoding. Thus, the present study aimed at manipulating mind wandering and boredom during an incidental memory encoding task, to test their differential impact on memory encoding. Thirty-two participants performed a variant of the n-back task in which they had to indicate if the current on-screen object was the same as the previous one (1-back; low working memory load) or the one presented three trials before (3-back; high working memory load). Moreover, thought probes assessing either mind wandering or boredom were randomly presented. Afterward, a surprise recognition task was delivered. Results showed that mind wandering and boredom were highly correlated, and both decreased in the high working memory load condition, while memory performance increased. Although both boredom and mind wandering predicted memory performance taken separately, we found that mind wandering was the only reliable predictor of memory performance when controlling for boredom and working memory load. Model comparisons also revealed that a model with boredom only was outperformed by a model with mind wandering only and a model with both mind wandering and boredom, suggesting that the predictive contribution of boredom in the complete model is minimal. The present results confirm the high correlation between mind wandering and boredom and suggest that the hindering effect of boredom on memory is subordinate to the effect of mind wandering.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Yu Chuang ◽  
Yi-Hsiu Chen ◽  
Prasad Balachandran ◽  
Wei-Kuang Liang ◽  
Chi-Hung Juan

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 531-539
Author(s):  
Rafał Lewkowicz ◽  
Paweł Stróżak ◽  
Bibianna Bałaj ◽  
Piotr Francuz

2006 ◽  
Vol 113 (10) ◽  
pp. 1477-1486 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Missonnier ◽  
M.-P. Deiber ◽  
G. Gold ◽  
P. Millet ◽  
M. Gex-Fabry Pun ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Sandrini ◽  
Anna Fertonani ◽  
Leonardo G. Cohen ◽  
Carlo Miniussi

Ergonomics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veerle Ross ◽  
Alexandra Y. Vossen ◽  
Fren T. Y. Smulders ◽  
Robert A. C. Ruiter ◽  
Tom Brijs ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 224 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Helton ◽  
Paul N. Russell

NeuroImage ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1004-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. McAllister ◽  
Molly B. Sparling ◽  
Laura A. Flashman ◽  
Stephen J. Guerin ◽  
Alexander C. Mamourian ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Angela A. Manginelli ◽  
Franziska Geringswald ◽  
Stefan Pollmann

When distractor configurations are repeated over time, visual search becomes more efficient, even if participants are unaware of the repetition. This contextual cueing is a form of incidental, implicit learning. One might therefore expect that contextual cueing does not (or only minimally) rely on working memory resources. This, however, is debated in the literature. We investigated contextual cueing under either a visuospatial or a nonspatial (color) visual working memory load. We found that contextual cueing was disrupted by the concurrent visuospatial, but not by the color working memory load. A control experiment ruled out that unspecific attentional factors of the dual-task situation disrupted contextual cueing. Visuospatial working memory may be needed to match current display items with long-term memory traces of previously learned displays.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Gajewski ◽  
Courtney P. Wallin ◽  
John W. Philbeck

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document