scholarly journals Corrigendum: Social Quarantine and Its Four Modes: Conceptional Exploration and the Theoretical Construction of the Policies Against COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka Lin ◽  
Ayesha Mumtaz ◽  
Mohammad Anisur Rahaman ◽  
Ka Ho Mok
Author(s):  
Mats Berdal

The post-Cold War era witnessed a growing tendency to justify the use and the threat of use of military force in international relations on humanitarian grounds. Freedman’s writing on the use of armed force in pursuit of humanitarian goals and his contribution to the field are explored in this chapter. He rejects the traditional dichotomies in International Relations scholarship between Realism and Idealism. Freedman’s work on ‘New Interventionism’, with the Chicago Speech contribution at its core, suggests that it is unhelpful to delineate sharply different existing schools of thought, or paradigms. Freedman draws a distinction between ‘realism as an unsentimental temper’ and realism as a ‘theoretical construction.’ Liberal values are important for Freedman and their universality is to be asserted, but that does not mean being naively oblivious to dangers and difficulties inherent in seeking to promote them as standards against which Western governments should be judged.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Helpris Estaswara ◽  
Diana Anggraeni

Managing stakeholders in the era of digital society become more complicated and the corporate crisis is highly potential to come forward. Consequently, to develop a long-term profitable relationship with the stakeholders requires dialogue based method. However, many corporate implement stakeholder relationship model remain derived from the understanding that corporate is the centre of all stakeholders, or corporate-centric model. A new model of system-centric than proposed in order to deal with the stakeholders in the era of digital society. The model implies that the corporate will be no longer being a central of stakeholders. It means the position of the corporate being a part of the system and involve symmetrical two-way communication strategy. This paper aimed at, firstly to elaborate a social network that would be potential to create the crisis if the corporate is not implementing the system-centric model that requires the development of multi-stakeholders learning dialogues. Secondly, it also analyzed the steps should be taken into account in order to transform traditional model toward symmetrical communication model of stakeholder relationship. Furthermore, method of literature review was applied as a basis of theoretical construction on stakeholder relationship model that should be engaged in avoiding of the crisis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Martin Blok Johansen

This article analyses and discusses research-ethical dilemmas, ambivalences and problematic issues. This is done firstly by making a distinction between procedural research ethics and particularistic research ethics. Such a distinction refl ects a theoretical construction and generalization – in practice there can be a very close correlation between the two types. Hereafter, the distinction will therefore be used as a jumping-off point for the presentation of a pragmatic-dualist research ethics. Th e approach is dualist because it draws on the presence of two independent, contrasting understandings, which are essentially diff erent yet equal aspects of good research ethics; and it is pragmatic because this dualism is first and foremost structural and institutional by nature, and designed with an eye to what can realistically and expediently be done in practice. Thus the intention of the article is to both analyze and discuss two different understandings of research ethics and simultaneouslyqualify a research ethics that draws on both these understandings. At the same time, the intention is to try to visualize a diff erent understanding of research ethics which others can address and elaborate on or qualify but even at this point can be included in an arsenal or catalogue of research-ethical understandings and approaches that can be exploited in research-ethical practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu’timaalahuyatazaka Yu’timaalahuyatazaka

Democracy in Indonesia is being tested. There are several the serious issues which is  highlighted recently such as money politic, political ethics, corrupt, and one of the cases of blasphemy. These problems need to be finished withthe education activities to overcome the nation's problems closely related to the issue of democracy. With the Nurcholish’s concept of democracy, it is hoped to give an awareness that the democracy is the concept of Islam on the Qoran and Sunnah. Besides Islamic education can offer a new theoretical construction of democracy that can provide alternative solutions to the problems of contemporary society in Indonesia. This research uses a library research. The data is obtained by using a literature review. Then, it is understood and analyzed theoritically and philosophically. The result ofresearch is the democratic Islamic education in the idea’s Nurcholish Madjid is Islamic education which prioritizes the principle of togetherness, change and development. Islamic education also needs to instill Indonesian-ness and modernity values in addition to Islam itself.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document