scholarly journals Comparative Effectiveness of Mild or Conventional GnRH-Antagonist Protocols for Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders (Poseidon Group 4)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoang Le ◽  
Dong D. Nguyen ◽  
Anh T. Cao ◽  
Huong T. L. Nguyen ◽  
Dung C. Tham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Reserve ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Poor Responders ◽  
Research Committee ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Stimulation Regimen ◽  
Antagonist Protocol

Background and Aims: A panel of experts (the Poseidon Group) introduced a new and more detailed stratification for poor ovarian responders in order to predict the prognosis of IVF outcome according to the sensitivity to FSH. However, various arguments about the management strategy of these patients still remain, including the convenience and the cost. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the efficacy of mild and conventional GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation prescribed in patients classified in Poseidon Group 4.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 359 poor responder patients (Poseidon Group 4) treated with mild or conventional GnRH antagonist stimulation regimens from 8/2017 to 7/2019 at Tam Anh Hospital ART Center. The main outcomes were the index of Follicular Output Rate (FORT) or Follicle to Oocyte Index (FOI), the number of day-2 embryos and top-quality embryos obtained. The t-test and Mann–Whitney U test in SPSS v25.0 was used to analyze the continuous data and Chi-squared/Exact test was used for binary variables. Multiple linear regression analysis was done by using Stata versions 15.0 to measure association between primary endpoints with stimulation regimen controlled for covariates and possible confounding factors.Results: In the overall group of poor responders, the conventional GnRH antagonist protocol performed better than the mild protocol. Subsequently, data were analyzed according to the AFC. In women with AFC < 3, no significant differences were observed between the 2 regimens regarding FORT (p = 0.71), FOI (p = 0.12), the number of day-2-embryos (p = 0.052) and the number of top-quality embryos (p = 0.26). In contrast, in women with AFC ≥ 3, mild stimulation regimen resulted in significantly poorer outcome compared to the conventional GnRH antagonist regimen, regarding FORT (p < 0.01), FOI (p < 0.01), the number of day-2-embryos (p < 0.01) and top-quality embryos (p = 0.01).Conclusions: Considering poor responders classified in Poseidon Group 4, both ovarian stimulation regimens resulted in similar outcome for patients with a very low ovarian reserve (AFC < 3). In contrast, the GnRH conventional antagonist protocol with maximum initial FSH dose (300–375 IU/day) and supplementary LH (75–150 IU/day) was more effective than the mild one for patients whose ovarian reserve was less reduced. The Clinical Trial was approved by the Ethnical Biomedical Research Committee Tam Anh General Hospital.

scholarly journals Use of Corifollitropin Alfa for Ovarian Stimulation: A Retrospective Analysis of 804 Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI

2019 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
pp. 93-98
Author(s):  
Nhu H. Giang ◽  
Lan N. Vuong ◽  
Toan D. Pham ◽  
Tuong M. Ho
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Ovarian Reserve ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Asian Population ◽  
Poor Responders ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Corifollitropin Alfa ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist Protocol ◽  
Oocyte Donors ◽  
Antagonist Protocol

Background: Corifollitropin alfa in GnRH antagonist protocol could provide a friendly treatment for IVF patients. There is limited evidence regarding the outcomes of corifollitropin alfa in ovarian hyperstimulation in Asian population. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted on IVF women from July 2012 to July 2018. The recruited patients were expected normal responders, expected poor responders and oocyte donors. The patients underwent GnRH antagonist protocol with corifollitropin alfa. Results: There were 804 IVF patients included in the study. The patients were analyzed into: normal ovarian reserve-autologous cycles ([Formula: see text] 36 years and [Formula: see text] 60 kg, n = 33; [Formula: see text] 36 years and [Formula: see text] 60 kg, n [Formula: see text] 9; [Formula: see text] 36 years and [Formula: see text] 50 kg, n [Formula: see text] 204; [Formula: see text] 36 years and [Formula: see text] 50 kg, n [Formula: see text] 52), normal ovarian reserve-donor cycles ([Formula: see text] 60 kg, n [Formula: see text] 234; [Formula: see text] 60 kg, n [Formula: see text] 104) and diminished ovarian reserve cycles (n [Formula: see text] 168). In each group of patients, the pregnancy outcomes of fresh embryo transfer were comparable to those of frozen embryo transfer. Conclusions: Corifollitropin alfa could offer an effective and simple treatment option for all groups of patients without PCOS.

scholarly journals Cumulative Live Birth Rate and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone-Antagonist Protocol and Multiple Minimal Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Rongjia Su ◽  
Yu Wu
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Poor Responders ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Gnrh Antagonists ◽  
Financial Expenditure ◽  
Minimal Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Antagonist Protocol

BackgroundThe overall cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) of poor ovarian responders (POR) is extremely low. Minimal ovarian stimulation (MOS) provides a relatively realistic solution for ovarian stimulation in POR. Our study aimed to investigate whether multiple MOS strategies resulted in higher CLBR compared to conventional gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists in POR.MethodsThis retrospective study included 699 patients (1,058 cycles) from one center, who fulfilled the Bologna criteria between 2010 and 2018. Overall, 325 women (325 cycles) were treated with one-time conventional GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation (GnRH-antagonist). Another 374 patients (733 cycles) were treated with multiple MOS including natural cycles. CLBR and time-and-cost-benefit analyses were compared between these two groups of women.ResultsGnRH antagonists provided more retrieved oocytes, meiosis II oocytes, fertilized oocytes, and more viable embryos compared to both the first MOS (p < 0.001) and the cumulative corresponding numbers in multiple MOSs (p < 0.001). For the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle, GnRH antagonists resulted in higher CLBR than MOS [12.92 versus 4.54%, adjusted OR (odds ratio) 2.606; 95% CI (confidence interval) 1.386, 4.899, p = 0.003]. The one-time GnRH-antagonist induced comparable CLBR (12.92 versus 7.92%, adjusted OR 1.702; 95% CI 0.971, 2.982, p = 0.063), but a shorter time to live birth [9 (8, 10.75) months versus 11 (9, 14) months, p = 0.014] and similar financial expenditure compared to repeated MOS [20,838 (17,953, 23,422) ¥ versus 21,261.5 (15,892.5, 35,140.25) ¥, p = 0.13].ConclusionBoth minimal ovarian stimulation (MOS) and GnRH-antagonists provide low chances of live birth in poor responders. The GnRH antagonist protocol is considered a suitable choice for PORs with comparable CLBR, shorter times to live birth, and similar financial expenditure compared to repeated MOS.

scholarly journals A Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist versus a Microdose Flare-Up GnRH Agonist Combined with a Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders to IVF

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gayem İnayet Turgay Çelik ◽  
Havva Kömür Sütçü ◽  
Yaşam Kemal Akpak ◽  
Münire Erman Akar
Keyword(s):  
Gnrh Agonist ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Poor Responders ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist Protocol ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Antagonist Protocol ◽  
Group 1

Objective. To compare the effectiveness of a flexible multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist against the effectiveness of a microdose flare-up GnRH agonist combined with a flexible multidose GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders to in vitro fertilization (IVF).Study Design. A retrospective study in Akdeniz University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Center, for 131 poor responders in the intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) program between January 2006 and November 2012. The groups were compared to the patients’ characteristics, controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) results, and laboratory results.Results. Combination protocol was applied to 46 patients (group 1), and a single protocol was applied to 85 patients (group 2). In group 1, the duration of the treatment was longer and the dose of FSH was higher. The cycle cancellation rate was significantly higher in group 2 (26.1% versus 38.8%). A significant difference was not observed with respect to the number and quality of oocytes and embryos or to the number of embryos transferred. There were no statistically significant differences in the hCG positivity (9.5% versus 9.4%) or the clinical pregnancy rates (7.1% versus 10.6%).Conclusion. The combination protocol does not provide additional efficacy.

A Short Ovarian Stimulation Does Not Negatively Impact IVF Pregnancy Rates When Utilizing a GnRH Antagonist Protocol

2005 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. S251-S252
Author(s):  
J.L. Eaton ◽  
A. Zimon ◽  
T. Von Wald ◽  
M. Goldman ◽  
M.M. Alper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist Protocol ◽  
Antagonist Protocol

scholarly journals A Novel Nomogram for Individualized Gonadotropin Starting Dose in GnRH Antagonist Protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yubin Li ◽  
Yuwei Duan ◽  
Xi Yuan ◽  
Bing Cai ◽  
Yanwen Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Bootstrap Resampling ◽  
Multivariate Regression Model ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist Protocol ◽  
Antagonist Protocol

Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is one of the most vital parts of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). At present, no matter what kinds of COS protocols are used, clinicians have to face the challenge of selection of gonadotropin starting dose. Although several nomograms have been developed to calculate the appropriate gonadotropin starting dose in gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol, no nomogram was suitable for GnRH antagonist protocol. This study aimed to develop a predictive nomogram for individualized gonadotropin starting dose in GnRH antagonist protocol. Single-center prospective cohort study was conducted, with 198 women aged 20-45 years underwent IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-ET cycles. Blood samples were collected on the second day of the menstrual cycle. All women received ovarian stimulation using GnRH antagonist protocol. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictive factors of ovarian sensitivity (OS). A nomogram for gonadotropin starting dose was developed based on the multivariate regression model. Validation was performed using concordance statistics and bootstrap resampling. A multivariate regression model based on serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level, antral follicle count (AFC), and body mass index (BMI) was developed and accounted for 59% of the variability of OS. An easy-to-use predictive nomogram for gonadotropin starting dose was established with excellent accuracy. The concordance index (C-index) of the nomogram was 0.833 (95% CI, 0.829-0.837). Internal validation using bootstrap resampling further showed the good performance of the nomogram. In conclusion, gonadotropin starting dose in antagonist protocol can be predicted precisely by a novel nomogram.

P-631 Embryo euploidy rates following follicular or luteal start ovarian stimulation. A prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation ovarian stimulation cycles

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Martinez ◽  
E Clua ◽  
M Roca ◽  
S Garcia ◽  
M Parriego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Infertile Women ◽  
Oocyte Donors ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Antagonist Protocol ◽  
Euploidy Rates ◽  
Euploidy Rate

Abstract Study question Is there any difference in embryo euploidy rates following luteal phase phase (LS) and follicular phase (FS) start ovarian stimulation. Summary answer The number of euploid blastocysts and embryo euploidy rate are comparable when comparing FS and LS. What is known already Random start ovarian stimulation (starting at any time of the cycle) has been traditionally used in women undergoing urgent fertility preservation for medical reason. Although there is accumulating evidence that in infertile women, LS can result in equivalent number of oocytes and embryos as compared with FS, no study has evaluated the effect of luteal phase start ovarian stimulation on embryo euploidy rates. The current study is the first prospective study designed to evaluate embryo euploidy rates in donors undergoing two identical consecutive ovarian stimulation protocols within a period of 6 months starting either in the (FS), or (LS). Study design, size, duration In a prospective study, conducted between May 2018 and January 2020, 40 oocyte donors underwent two consecutive ovarian stimulation protocols within a period of 6 months with an identical fixed GnRH antagonist protocol starting either in the early follicular (FS), or and luteal menstrual cycle phase (LS). Participants/materials, setting, methods All participants underwent two identical consecutive ovarian stimulation cycles with 150μg corifollitropin alfa followed by 200 IU rFSH in a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol either in the FS or LS. Six MII oocytes from the same oocyte donor, from each stimulation cycle, were allocated to the recipients and were inseminated with the same sperm sample (recipients partner sperm or donor sperm). Embryos were cultivated to blastocyst stage followed by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Main results and the role of chance When comparing FP with LP, the duration of ovarian stimulation was significantly shorter (9.68± 2.09 vs 10.93± 1.55 days), 95% CI [-1.95; -0.55] and a higher total additional dose of daily recFSH was significantly lower (526.14± 338.94 IU vs 726.14± 366.27), 95% CI [-315,12; -84,88] when CPT was administered in the luteal phase. . There were no differences in the hormone values on the triggering day (Estradiol 2137.61±1198.25 pg/ml vs 2362.96±1472.89); 95% CI [-1160.45;709.76]. Overall no differences were observed in the number of oocytes (24.84± 11.200 vs 24.27± 9.08); 95% CI[-2,61; 3.75] and MII oocytes (21.41±10.19 vs 21.59± 8.81), 95%CI [-2.72; 2.35] retrieved between FP and LP cycles in the oocytes donors. Following oocyte allocation and fertilization to the recipients, a total of 245 blastocysts were biopsied (blastocyst formation rate 245/408, 60.05%), 117 in FP group and 128 in LP group. The overall blastocyst euploidy rate was 59.18% . There were no differences in the number of euploid embryos between FS (1.59±1.32) and LS (1.70±1.29), mean difference 0.11, 95%CI [-0.65; 0.46]. Finally, there were no differences in the percentage of euploid embryos per oocytes inseminated between FS [70/287 (24.4%)] and LP [75/278 (24.7%), mean difference -0.027, 95%CI [-0.11; 0.06]. Limitations, reasons for caution The study was performed in oocyte derived from potentially fertile young oocyte donors thus caution is needed when extrapolating the results in oocytes derived from infertile women of older age. Wider implications of the findings Luteal phase stimulation does not alter embryo euploidy status as compared with follicular phase stimulation and thus it appears that it can be safely used not only in cases of urgent medical fertility preservation but also in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Trial registration number Clinical Trials Gov (NCT03555942).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document