scholarly journals Supermarkets and Household Food Acquisition Patterns in Vietnam in Relation to Population Demographics and Socioeconomic Strata: Insights From Public Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huong T. Trinh ◽  
Burra D. Dhar ◽  
Michel Simioni ◽  
Stef de Haan ◽  
Tuyen Thi Thanh Huynh ◽  
...  
Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 3930
Author(s):  
Katherine J. Barrett ◽  
Sarah K. Hibbs-Shipp ◽  
Savannah Hobbs ◽  
Richard E. Boles ◽  
Susan L. Johnson ◽  
...  

The home food environment (HFE) is associated with dietary intake; yet measuring HFE quality often requires burdensome collection of detailed inventories. This project evaluated the capacity of the Home Inventory to Describe Eating and Activity, version 2 (Home-IDEA2) to capture HFE quality by measuring the presence or absence of household foods. Validity was tested using a modified application of the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI). Comparative data were drawn from the National Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS) Food-at-Home Public Use File. HEI scores were calculated for 4202 households in FoodAPS using Home-IDEA2 inventories and full reported inventories. Paired t-tests compared: (1) estimated vs. total edible grams (EEG; TEG); (2) limited vs. all reported foods; and (3) EEG + limited foods vs. TEG + all reported foods. Sensitivity and range of scores were compared. Mean HEI scores for Home-IDEA2 were higher (p < 0.003) than FoodAPS: (1) 51.6 ± 16.1 vs. 49.6 ± 18.1 (food amounts); (2) 53.5 ± 15.8 vs. 49.8 ± 15.4 (food items); (3) 55.5 ± 15.7 vs. 49.8 ± 15.4 (full instrument); differences were small. Scores demonstrated comparable sensitivity and range. The study found that the Home-IDEA2 can capture HFE quality adequately with low data collection burden.


1990 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-562
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. DeWalt ◽  
Sandra D’Angelo ◽  
Molly McFadden ◽  
Frederick W. Danner ◽  
Melody Noland ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elina T Page ◽  
Elizabeth Larimore ◽  
John A Kirlin ◽  
Mark Denbaly

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Mayra Crespo-Bellido ◽  
Stephanie Grutzmacher ◽  
Ellen Smit

Abstract Objective: To determine the characteristics of US low-income households that use alternative food acquisition strategies and to examine the association between food security and alternative food acquisition. Design: Cross-sectional analysis. The ten-item Adult Food Security Survey Module was used to determine food security status. Self-reported data were used to determine food acquisition from community food sources, social networks and household food production. Setting: The National Food Acquisition and Purchasing Survey (FoodAPS), 2012. Participants: The sample consisted of 2534 low-income households (≤185 % of the federal poverty line) in the USA. Results: Households using alternative food acquisition strategies were more likely to have a primary respondent who was non-Hispanic White, born in the USA, and female, and more likely to live in a rural area, have higher income and own a home than households not using alternative acquisition strategies. Very low food security was positively associated with the use of community food sources (aOR = 2·26 (95 % CI 1·15, 4·46)). There was no association between food security and food acquisition from social networks or household food production. Conclusions: Use of alternative food acquisition strategies varied by specific demographic characteristics among low-income households, suggesting opportunities for outreach and promotion of alternative acquisition strategies in specific subpopulations in the USA. Future research should examine whether quantity and quality of food received from these sources are associated with food security.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 877-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengyao Hu ◽  
John A Kirlin ◽  
Brady T West ◽  
Wenyi He ◽  
Ai Rene Ong ◽  
...  

Abstract Diary surveys are used to collect data on a variety of topics, including health, time use, nutrition, and expenditures. The US National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS) is a nationally representative diary survey, providing an important data source for decision-makers to design policies and programs for promoting healthy lifestyles. Unfortunately, a multiday diary survey like the FoodAPS can be subject to various survey errors, especially item nonresponse error occurring at the day level. The FoodAPS public-use data set provides survey weights that adjust only for unit nonresponse. Due to the lack of day-level weights (which could possibly adjust for the item nonresponse that arises from refusals on particular days), the adjustments for unit nonresponse are unlikely to correct any bias in estimates arising from households that initially agree to participate in FoodAPS but then fail to report on particular days. This article develops a general methodology for estimating the extent of underreporting due to this type of item nonresponse error in diary surveys, using FoodAPS as a case study. We describe a methodology combining bootstrap replicate sampling for complex samples and imputation based on a Heckman selection model to predict food expenditures for person-days with missing expenditures. We estimated the item nonresponse error by comparing weighted estimates according to only reported expenditures and both reported expenditures and predictions for missing values. Results indicate that ignoring the missing data would lead to consistent overestimation of the mean expenditures and events per person per day and underestimation of the total expenditures and events. Our study suggests that the household-level weights, which generally account for unit nonresponse, may not be entirely sufficient for addressing the nonresponse occurring at the day level in diary surveys, and proper imputation methods will be important for estimating the size of the underreporting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document