scholarly journals Interoperability Reference Models for Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2704
Author(s):  
Oyun Kwon ◽  
Sun K. Yoo

Medical imaging is currently being applied in artificial intelligence and big data technologies in data formats. In order for medical imaging collected from different institutions and systems to be used for artificial intelligence data, interoperability is becoming a key element. Whilst interoperability is currently guaranteed through medical data standards, compliance to personal information protection laws, and other methods, a standard solution for measurement values is deemed to be necessary in order for further applications as artificial intelligence data. As a result, this study proposes a model for interoperability in medical data standards, personal information protection methods, and medical imaging measurements. This model applies Health Level Seven (HL7) and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standards to medical imaging data standards and enables increased accessibility towards medical imaging data in the compliance of personal information protection laws through the use of de-identifying methods. This study focuses on offering a standard for the measurement values of standard materials that addresses uncertainty in measurements that pre-existing medical imaging measurement standards did not provide. The study finds that medical imaging data standards conform to pre-existing standards and also provide protection to personal information within any medical images through de-identifying methods. Moreover, it proposes a reference model that increases interoperability by composing a process that minimizes uncertainty using standard materials. The interoperability reference model is expected to assist artificial intelligence systems using medical imaging and further enhance the resilience of future health technologies and system development.

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumedha Sachar ◽  
Maïa Dakessian ◽  
Saina Beitari ◽  
Saishree Badrinarayanan

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have the potential to revolutionize the healthcare system with their immense potential to diagnose, personalize treatments, and reduce physician burnout. These technologies are highly dependent on large datasets to learn from and require data sharing across organizations for reliable and efficient predictive analysis. However, adoption of AI/ML technologies will require policy imperatives to address the challenges of data privacy, accountability, and bias. To form a regulatory framework, we propose that algorithms should be interpretable and that companies that utilize a black box model for their algorithms be held accountable for the output of their ML systems. To aid in increasing accountability and reducing bias, physicians can be educated about the inherent bias that can be generated from the ML system. We further discuss the potential benefits and disadvantages of existing privacy standards ((Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act) PIPEDA and (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act) GDPR) at the federal, provincial and territorial levels. We emphasize responsible implementation of AI by ethics, skill-building, and minimizing data privacy breaches while boosting innovation and increased accessibility and interoperability across provinces.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-35
Author(s):  
Suhyeon Kim ◽  
Sumin Kang ◽  
Jaein Yoo ◽  
Gahyeon Lee ◽  
Hyojeong Yi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Motohiro Tsuchiya

The Japanese legal system has been based on the German legal system since the mid-nineteenth century, but the American legal system was grafted onto it following Japan’s defeat in World War II in 1945. The postwar Constitution contained an article regarding the secrecy of communications and protected privacy in terms of respect of individuals. Now, as the Personal Information Protection Law in the Executive Branch, which was enacted in 1988, and the Personal Information Protection Law, which was enacted in 2003, strictly regulate privacy, there have been fewer problematic cases regarding governmental access to private-sector data. Data gathering for law enforcement or intelligence activities has also been weaker following World War II. Private-sector corporations/organizations might share data with government agencies, but based on voluntary arrangements, not by any mandatory system. More focus is being cast not on governmental access to private-sector data, but on citizen’s access to data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document