scholarly journals Emission Characteristics and Ozone Formation Potential Assessment of VOCs from Typical Metal Packaging Plants

Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Hailin Wang ◽  
Song Xue ◽  
Run Hao ◽  
Li Fang ◽  
Lei Nie

With the rapid development of metal packaging, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions from the packaging processes are also increasing gradually. It is necessary to research the characteristics of VOCs emissions from such important industrial source and its impact on the possible ozone formation. In this research, three typical metal packaging plants were selected, VOCs emission characteristics were investigated, and their ozone formation potential were evaluated by using maximum incremental reactivity (MIR) coefficient method. The results showed that the VOCs emission characteristics of the selected targets were obviously different. VOCs emitted from plant A and B were mainly oxygenated hydrocarbons, which accounted for 85.02% and 43.17%, respectively. Olefins (62.75%) were the main species of plant C. 2-butanone (82.67%), methylene chloride (23.00%) and ethylene (36.67%) were the major species of plant A, plant B and plant C, respectively. The OFP (ozone formation potential) value of plant B (120.49 mg/m3) was much higher than those values of plant A (643.05 mg/m3) and plant C (3311.73 mg/m3), in which para-xylene, meta-xylene, acetaldehyde and ethylene were the main contributors. The difference in OFP values indicated that water-based ink and water-based coatings should be recommended for large scale application due to less VOCs emission and low ozone formation contribution.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaobo Chen ◽  
Zhongjun Xu ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
Yuanyuan Zhuang ◽  
Mengyun Jiang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 9345-9355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trieu-Vuong Dinh ◽  
Su-Yeon Kim ◽  
Youn-Suk Son ◽  
In-Young Choi ◽  
Seong-Ryong Park ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 2292-2298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody J. Howard ◽  
Anuj Kumar ◽  
Frank Mitloehner ◽  
Kimberly Stackhouse ◽  
Peter G. Green ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsi-Hsien Yang ◽  
Sunil Kumar Gupta ◽  
Narayan Babu Dhital

AbstractManufacturing industries are one of the important emission sectors of anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In this study, VOC emission factors, relative ozone formation potential (ROFP) and relative carcinogenic risk (RCR) were estimated for manufacturing industries (n = 13) located in central Taiwan. Emission samples were collected in stainless steel canisters and were analyzed with a system of gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy. Higher emission factors of total VOCs (∑VOCs) were observed for stencil printing (423 mg-VOC kg− 1) compared to other emission industries. Alkanes constituted the most prominent group of VOCs for steel foundry (42%), aluminum foundry (25%) and synthetic resin industries (25%). Oxygenated VOCs were the most abundant group in the organic solvent (80%), polyester resin (80%) and polyurethane (75%) industries. Moreover, emissions from acrylic resin manufacturing had a major contribution from aromatic compounds (> 95%). Toluene was the topmost compound in terms of its contribution to ∑VOCs in plastic tape manufacturing (44%), aluminum foundry (40%), steel foundry (12%), plastic coating (64%) and stencil printing (35%). Analysis of ozone formation potentials showed that the metal product and machinery acrylic resin manufacturing and stencil printing had a higher normalized relative ozone formation potential (ROFP) index and belonged to Level-I emission sources. However, in terms of the relative carcinogenic risk (RCR), integrated iron and steel manufacturing had the highest normalized RCR index that belonged to level-I emission sources. Level-I represents the most important VOC emission sources. This study provides a reactivity- and carcinogenicity-based approach to identify high-priority VOC emission sources. The results of this study would help formulate emission reduction policies and strategies for manufacturing industries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 1238-1251
Author(s):  
Hailiang Zhang ◽  
Yongfu Xu ◽  
Long Jia ◽  
Min Xu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document