scholarly journals Combination of Different Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Any Gain in Diagnostic Performance?

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Gies ◽  
Katarina Cuk ◽  
Petra Schrotz-King ◽  
Hermann Brenner

A variety of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are used for colorectal cancer screening. FIT performance could be improved further. It is unclear, whether the combination of different FITs with different analytical characteristics (such as, different antibodies for the detection of fecal hemoglobin) can yield a better diagnostic performance. Fecal samples were obtained from 2042 participants of screening colonoscopy. All participants with advanced neoplasm (AN, colorectal cancer (n = 16) or advanced adenoma (n = 200)) and 300 randomly selected participants without AN were included. Nine quantitative FITs were evaluated simultaneously. Sensitivity and specificity was calculated for single tests (n = 9) and for their pairwise test combinations (n = 36) (requiring either both FITs (P++) or at least one FIT (P+) to be positive for defining a positive test result). Mean age of the participants (n = 516) was 63 (range: 50–79) years and 56% were men. At cutoffs yielding a specificity of 96.7% for single FITs, the median gain in specificity by P++ combination was +1.0%, whereas the median loss in sensitivity for AN was −4.2%. For P+ combination the median gain in sensitivity for AN was +2.8%, at a prize of median loss of −1.0% of specificity. Combinations of different FITs do not yield any relevant gain in diagnostic performance.

Author(s):  
Alicia Brotons ◽  
Mercedes Guilabert ◽  
Francisco Lacueva ◽  
José Mira ◽  
Blanca Lumbreras ◽  
...  

Colonoscopy services working in colorectal cancer screening programs must perform periodic controls to improve the quality based on patients’ experiences. However, there are no validated instruments in this setting that include the two core dimensions for optimal care: satisfaction and safety. The aim of this study was to design and validate a specific questionnaire for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test, the Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire based on patients’ experience (CSSQP). The design included a review of available evidence and used focus groups to identify the relevant dimensions to produce the instrument (content validity). Face validity was analyzed involving 15 patients. Reliability and construct and empirical validity were calculated. Validation involved patients from the colorectal cancer screening program at two referral hospitals in Spain. The CSSQP version 1 consisted of 15 items. The principal components analysis of the satisfaction items isolated three factors with saturation of elements above 0.52 and with high internal consistency and split-half readability: Information, Care, and Service and Facilities features. The analysis of the safety items isolated two factors with element saturations above 0.58: Information Gaps and Safety Incidents. The CSSQP is a new valid and reliable tool for measuring patient’ experiences, including satisfaction and safety perception, after a colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 1054-1056
Author(s):  
Valeria D'Ovidio ◽  
Martina Carbone ◽  
Stefano Fratoni ◽  
Marco Emilio Bazuro

Radiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 297 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perry J. Pickhardt ◽  
Peter M. Graffy ◽  
Benjamin Weigman ◽  
Nimrod Deiss-Yehiely ◽  
Cesare Hassan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document