stool dna
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

253
(FIVE YEARS 101)

H-INDEX

25
(FIVE YEARS 5)

Author(s):  
Zhongxin Wang ◽  
Jian Shang ◽  
Guannan Zhang ◽  
Lingjun Kong ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nimrod Deiss-Yehiely ◽  
Peter M. Graffy ◽  
Benjamin Weigman ◽  
Cesare Hassan ◽  
Kristina A. Matkowskyj ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farideh Saberi ◽  
Virinder Sarhadi ◽  
Omar Youssef ◽  
Arto Kokkola ◽  
Pauli Puolakkainen ◽  
...  

Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) rated among the three most diagnosed cancers and the fourth main cause of death worldwide. CRC is a curable cancer provided to be diagnosed at its early-stage. Colonoscopy, stool and blood-based tests are in use for CRC diagnosis/screening. Due to low patient compliance, low specificity and high rate of false results, more reliable methods with desired level of detection accuracy and high patients’ compliance are highly demanded. Detecting hotspot mutations in stool DNA emerged as a robust noninvasive alternative, but due to the different genetic background of various populations and hence varied mutation spectrum/prevalence, prior assessment of CRC mutations in the population is essential. Here, we have evaluated stool DNAs from CRC patients and controls using a NGS based 22 genes panel. Hotspot mutations in NRAS, FGFR3, SMAD4 and TP53 genes had higher prevalence among the CRC patients compare to normal controls. Patients were followed up in their post-surgical period. Six of them (12%) with TP53 mutations (2 patients had NRAS mutation as well) were died of cancer. Those harboring mutations in TP53 and/or NRAS would be regarded as high risk and should be provided with special care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. e2122328
Author(s):  
Richard M. Hoffman ◽  
Barcey T. Levy ◽  
James E. Allison

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110318
Author(s):  
Thomas K. Kleinschmidt ◽  
Austin Clements ◽  
Mark A. Parker ◽  
Steven D. Scarcliff

Objectives To review the effectiveness of noninvasive multitarget stool DNA testing as a screening test for colorectal cancer. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients referred to 2 high volume outpatient procedural centers for colonoscopy for positive Cologuard test. Positive findings for colorectal cancer based on pathologic findings and also advanced adenomas were recorded. Positive predictive value (PPV) was assessed. Results Of the 1585 patients evaluated and referred for colonoscopy from January 1, 2018 to November 1, 2019, for ICD-10 codes R19.5 (other fecal abnormalities) and K92.1 (melena), 84 were referred for a positive Cologuard test. Out of the 84, 6 were excluded based on family history of colon cancer in first degree relative or personal history of inflammatory bowel disease. Of the remaining 78 patients, 1 patient (1.3%) had colorectal cancer and 5 (6.4%) had advanced adenomas (>1 cm size, high grade dysplasia or villous). Postive predictive value for colorectal cancer was 1.3% and for precancerous lesions plus colorectal cancer was 7.7%. A total of 53 (68.0%) patients had either totally normal colonoscopy or hyperplastic polyps. Out of the 78 individuals in our study, 70 (89.7%) had normal findings, hyperplastic polyps, or non-advanced adenomas. Conclusions Multitarget stool DNA testing carries an unacceptably low PPV to be utilized as a screening test for colorectal cancer. The study fails to detect both adenomas and colon cancer at a higher rate than screening colonoscopy in selected studies. The advantage of being noninvasive has been noted to increase colorectal cancer screening in otherwise non-compliant Medicare patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document