scholarly journals Automated Quantification of sTIL Density with H&E-Based Digital Image Analysis Has Prognostic Potential in Triple-Negative Breast Cancers

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 3050
Author(s):  
Jeppe Thagaard ◽  
Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard ◽  
Line Grove Vognsen ◽  
Søren Hauberg ◽  
Anders Dahl ◽  
...  

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and difficult-to-treat cancer type that represents approximately 15% of all breast cancers. Recently, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) resurfaced as a strong prognostic biomarker for overall survival (OS) for TNBC patients. Manual assessment has innate limitations that hinder clinical adoption, and the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group (TIL-WG) has therefore envisioned that computational assessment of sTIL could overcome these limitations and recommended that any algorithm should follow the manual guidelines where appropriate. However, no existing studies capture all the concepts of the guideline or have shown the same prognostic evidence as manual assessment. In this study, we present a fully automated digital image analysis pipeline and demonstrate that our hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-based pipeline can provide a quantitative and interpretable score that correlates with the manual pathologist-derived sTIL status, and importantly, can stratify a retrospective cohort into two significant distinct prognostic groups. We found our score to be prognostic for OS (HR: 0.81 CI: 0.72–0.92 p = 0.001) independent of age, tumor size, nodal status, and tumor type in statistical modeling. While prior studies have followed fragments of the TIL-WG guideline, our approach is the first to follow all complex aspects, where appropriate, supporting the TIL-WG vision of computational assessment of sTIL in the future clinical setting.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Mari Mino-Kenudson ◽  
Iny Jhun ◽  
Daniel Shepherd ◽  
YinP Hung ◽  
Emilio Madrigal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10066-10066
Author(s):  
Margaret Chou ◽  
Irineu Illa-Bochaca ◽  
Ben Minxi ◽  
Keith M. Giles ◽  
Farbod Darvishian ◽  
...  

10066 Background: Inclusion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) into AJCC staging criteria has been proposed due to evidence suggesting its prognostic significance. However, subjective inter-observer discordance prevents adoption of semi-quantitative TIL grading (e.g. absent, non-brisk, brisk) into clinical practice. We hypothesize that digital-image analysis (DIA) of TIL can provide a standardized, quantitative scoring system that more accurately predicts survival compared to currently used semi-quantitative grading methods. Methods: Clinical data and tumor specimens were analyzed from prospectively enrolled primary melanoma patients in the New York University Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group with median follow-up of 5 years. H&E-stained slides were digitized using an Aperio ScanScope at 20X magnification. QuPath software was used for automated TIL quantification. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the improved prognostic value of TIL on recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were separated into high- and low-TIL groups using a score threshold determined by the Youden Index. Results: 453 patients (18% stage I, 42% stage II, 40% stage III) were scored using automated TIL assessment and scores were significantly correlated with better RFS and OS per 10% increase in TIL (stage adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.92 [0.84-1.00] for RFS and aHR = 0.90 [0.83-0.99] for OS). A model combining TIL score with stage increased prognostic ability for both RFS (0.68 to 0.70, P = 0.02) and OS (0.62 to 0.64, P = 0.01), as assessed by concordance indices (C-index). Kaplan-Meier curves of high- ( > 16.6%) versus low-TIL (≤16.6%) patients showed clear separation in RFS and OS (median RFS = 155 vs 48 months, P < 0.001; median OS = 155 vs 89 months, P = 0.002). For comparison, a subset of the cohort (n = 250) was semi-quantitatively graded (absent, non-brisk, brisk) by an attending melanoma pathologist; however, this did not significantly differentiate RFS between groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: A standardized, quantitative TIL scoring system significantly improved prediction of RFS and OS in primary melanoma patients compared with semi-quantitative TIL grading. Incorporation of quantitative TIL scoring into prognostic algorithms, such as AJCC criteria, should be considered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 476 (5) ◽  
pp. 701-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norie Abe ◽  
Hirofumi Matsumoto ◽  
Reika Takamatsu ◽  
Kentaro Tamaki ◽  
Naoko Takigami ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document