scholarly journals Catalytic Hydrogen Production from Methane: A Review on Recent Progress and Prospect

Catalysts ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luning Chen ◽  
Zhiyuan Qi ◽  
Shuchen Zhang ◽  
Ji Su ◽  
Gabor A. Somorjai

Natural gas (Methane) is currently the primary source of catalytic hydrogen production, accounting for three quarters of the annual global dedicated hydrogen production (about 70 M tons). Steam–methane reforming (SMR) is the currently used industrial process for hydrogen production. However, the SMR process suffers with insufficient catalytic activity, low long-term stability, and excessive energy input, mostly due to the handling of large amount of CO2 coproduced. With the demand for anticipated hydrogen production to reach 122.5 M tons in 2024, novel and upgraded catalytic processes are desired for more effective utilization of precious natural resources. In this review, we summarized the major descriptors of catalyst and reaction engineering of the SMR process and compared the SMR process with its derivative technologies, such as dry reforming with CO2 (DRM), partial oxidation with O2, autothermal reforming with H2O and O2. Finally, we discussed the new progresses of methane conversion: direct decomposition to hydrogen and solid carbon and selective oxidation in mild conditions to hydrogen containing liquid organics (i.e., methanol, formic acid, and acetic acid), which serve as alternative hydrogen carriers. We hope this review will help to achieve a whole picture of catalytic hydrogen production from methane.

Author(s):  
M. Gambini ◽  
M. Vellini

In this paper two options for H2 production by means of fossil fuels are presented, evaluating their performance when integrated with advanced H2/air cycles. The investigation has been developed with reference to two different schemes, representative both of consolidated technology (combined cycle power plants) and of innovative technology (a new advance mixed cycle, named AMC). The two methods, here considered, to produce H2 are: • coal gasification: it permits transformation of a solid fuel into a gaseous one, by means of partial combustion reactions; • steam-methane reforming: it is the simplest and potentially the most economic method for producing hydrogen in the foreseeable future. These hydrogen production plants require material and energy integrations with the power section, and the best connections must be investigated in order to obtain good overall performance. The main results of the performed investigation are quite variable among the different H2 production options here considered: for example the efficiency value is over 34% for power plants coupled with coal decarbonization system, while it is in a range of 45–48% for power plants coupled with natural gas decarbonization. These differences are similar to those attainable by advanced combined cycle power plants fuelled by natural gas (traditional CC) and coal (IGCC). In other words, the decarbonization of different fossil fuels involves the same efficiency penalty related to the use of different fossil fuel in advanced cycle power plants (from CC to IGCC for example). The CO2 specific emissions depend on the fossil fuel type and the overall efficiency: adopting a removal efficiency of 90% in the CO2 absorption systems, the CO2 emission reduction is 87% and 82% in the coal gasification and in the steam-methane reforming respectively.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (24) ◽  
pp. 10193-10201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hani W. Abu El Hawa ◽  
Sean-Thomas B. Lundin ◽  
Neil S. Patki ◽  
J. Douglas Way

2019 ◽  
Vol 337 ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaobing Zhu ◽  
Xiaoyu Liu ◽  
Hao-Yu Lian ◽  
Jing-Lin Liu ◽  
Xiao-Song Li

2018 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 1041-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiattikhoon Phuakpunk ◽  
Benjapon Chalermsinsuwan ◽  
Sompong Putivisutisak ◽  
Suttichai Assabumrungrat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document