scholarly journals Life Cycle Costing Analysis: Tools and Applications for Determining Hydrogen Production Cost for Fuel Cell Vehicle Technology

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Khzouz ◽  
Evangelos Gkanas ◽  
Jia Shao ◽  
Farooq Sher ◽  
Dmytro Beherskyi ◽  
...  

This work investigates life cycle costing analysis as a tool to estimate the cost of hydrogen to be used as fuel for Hydrogen Fuel Cell vehicles (HFCVs). The method of life cycle costing and economic data are considered to estimate the cost of hydrogen for centralised and decentralised production processes. In the current study, two major hydrogen production methods are considered, methane reforming and water electrolysis. The costing frameworks are defined for hydrogen production, transportation and final application. The results show that hydrogen production via centralised methane reforming is financially viable for future transport applications. The ownership cost of HFCVs shows the highest cost among other costs of life cycle analysis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (No. 5) ◽  
pp. 216-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hejazian Mohammad ◽  
Lotfalian Majid ◽  
Limaei Soleiman Mohammadi

This study was conducted in order to estimate the economic life of two models of rubber-tired skidders, namely Timberjack 450C and HSM 904, in Iranian Caspian forests. The total annual costs and average cumulative cost of skidders were calculated by life-cycle costing analysis. The economic life of the machines was estimated by both the cumulative cost model and cost minimization model. The results indicated that the economic life of Timberjack 450C and HSM 904 is 7,700 h (at the end of the 11<sup>th</sup> year) and 15,300 h (at the end of the 17<sup>th</sup> year), respectively, using the cost minimization model. Furthermore, the results indicated that the economic life of Timberjack 450C and HSM 904 is 9,100 h (at the end of the 13<sup>th</sup> year) and 11,900 h (at the end of the 21<sup>st</sup> year), respectively, using the cumulative cost model. The cumulative cost model estimated the economic life of skidders longer than the cost minimization model.


2012 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 606-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Symes ◽  
Bushra Al-Duri ◽  
Aman Dhir ◽  
Waldemar Bujalski ◽  
Ben Green ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 608-609 ◽  
pp. 950-954
Author(s):  
Tao Ma ◽  
Ming Qi Chen ◽  
Xiao Hui Jia ◽  
Xue Zhang ◽  
Ping Ma

Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles (HFCVs) represent a promising solution to reduce overall green house gas emissions and ensure sustainable mobility. The cost of the alternative production processes should be thought about in the frame of the whole infrastructure chain in HFCVs commercialization. This paper focuses on comparing three hydrogen production technologies to serve an emerging HFCVs market. The H2A model has provided the DOE Fuel Cell Technologies Program with a technology neutral cost calculator. Given the basic framework and the assumptions, the estimation outputs have been accomplished in H2A model. We conclude three points: Production costs and production capacity are closely linked; at the same scale of production, to adopt a different mode of production, the cost requirement is not the same; natural gas and electricity, especially electricity costs account for a large proportion of the cost in the hydrogen infrastructure construction.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1006-1007 ◽  
pp. 1199-1202
Author(s):  
Yuan Ren ◽  
Zhi Dan Zhong ◽  
Zhi Wen Zhang

Current development in fuel cells and hydrogen fuel cells vehicles are first described in the paper, and then the paper gives up-to-date review of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle technological status and hydrogen infrastructure. Then the paper analysis barriers in hydrogen fuel cell vehicle commercialization and the cost reduction challenges especially in the material for catalyst and operational condition. Then in the end this paper gives the hydrogen fuel cell vehicles prospects and outlook.


2020 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 102897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kelley ◽  
Aimee Krafft ◽  
Michael Kuby ◽  
Oscar Lopez ◽  
Rhian Stotts ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 464-475
Author(s):  
O. Grimes ◽  
C. Bastien ◽  
J. Christensen ◽  
N. Rawlins ◽  
W. Hammond ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dyah Ika Rinawati ◽  
Alexander Ryota Keeley ◽  
Shutaro Takeda ◽  
Shunsuke Managi

Abstract This study conducted a systematic literature review of the technical aspects and methodological choices in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of using hydrogen for road transport. More than 70 scientific papers published during 2000–2021 were reviewed, in which more than 350 case studies of use of hydrogen in the automotive sector were found. Only some studies used hybrid LCA and energetic input-output LCA, whereas most studies addressed attributional process-based LCA. A categorization based on the life cycle scope distinguished case studies that addressed the well-to-tank (WTT), well-to-wheel (WTW), and complete life cycle approaches. Furthermore, based on the hydrogen production process, these case studies were classified into four categories: thermochemical, electrochemical, thermal-electrochemical, and biochemical. Moreover, based on the hydrogen production site, the case studies were classified as centralized, on-site, and on-board. The fuel cell vehicle passenger car was the most commonly used vehicle. The functional unit for the WTT studies was mostly mass or energy, and vehicle distance for the WTW and complete life cycle studies. Global warming potential (GWP) and energy consumption were the most influential categories. Apart from the GREET (Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation) model and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for assessing the GWP, the Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden method was most widely used in other impact categories. Most of the articles under review were comparative LCA studies on different hydrogen pathways and powertrains. The findings provide baseline data not only for large-scale applications, but also for improving the efficiency of hydrogen use in road transport.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document