scholarly journals Women’s Breast Cancer Knowledge and Health Communication in the United Arab Emirates

Healthcare ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 495
Author(s):  
Dania Abu Awwad ◽  
Syeda Hossain ◽  
Martin Mackey ◽  
Patrick Brennan ◽  
Shukri Adam

In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), women’s participation in breast cancer screening is low, and women are commonly diagnosed in advanced stages. This study investigated women’s attitudes towards breast cancer screening, their use of health services in the UAE emirate of Ras Al Khaimah, and their preferred medium for breast cancer information. In this qualitative study, six focus groups were conducted with Emirati (n = 28) and non-Emirati (n = 26) women as Ras Al Khaimah is a highly multi-cultural region. Women were separated into different age groups (25–34, 30–44, 44+) so as to obtain perspectives of young (n = 16), middle (n = 19), and older women (n = 19). The focus group transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Women recognised that any breast change should be checked by a doctor, and that women with symptoms or those at higher risk may need to have breast screening earlier than the recommended starting age. However, participants wanted more information from doctors or other health personnel. Women had observed breast cancer information and campaigns advertisements in multiple media but recommended greater use of social media and WhatsApp to disseminate information. Overall, women had positive attitudes towards breast cancer screening but wanted more breast cancer awareness campaigns year-round and better access to screening.

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Siembida ◽  
Archana Radhakrishnan ◽  
Sarah A. Nowak ◽  
Andrew M. Parker ◽  
Craig Evan Pollack

Purpose Physician reminders have successfully increased rates of mammography. However, considering recent changes to breast cancer screening guidelines that disagree on the optimal age to start and stop mammography screening, we sought to examine the extent to which reminders have been deployed for breast cancer screening targeting younger and older patients. Methods A mailed survey was sent to a national sample of 2,000 primary care physicians between May and September 2016. Physicians were asked whether they received reminders to screen women in various age groups (40 to 44, 45 to 49, and ≥ 75 years), the organizational screening guidelines they trusted most, and whether they recommended routine breast cancer screening to average-risk women in the different age groups. Using regression models, we assessed the association between reminders and physician screening recommendations, controlling for physician and practice characteristics, and evaluated whether the association varied by the guidelines they trusted. Results A total of 871 physicians responded (adjusted response rate, 52.3%). Overall, 28.9% of physicians reported receiving reminders for patient ages 40 to 44 years, 32.5% for patient ages 45 to 49 years, and 16.5% for patient ages ≥ 75 years. Receiving reminders significantly increased the likelihood of physicians recommending mammography screening. In adjusted analyses, 84% (95% CI, 77% to 90%) of physicians who received reminders recommended screening for women ages ≥ 75 versus 65% (95% CI, 62% to 69%) of those who did not receive reminders. The associations between reminders and screening recommendations remained consistent regardless of which guidelines physicians reported trusting. Conclusion Reminders were significantly associated with increases in physician screening recommendations for mammography, underscoring the need for careful implementation in scenarios where guidelines are discordant.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S246-S246
Author(s):  
Soonhee Roh ◽  
Yeon-Shim Lee ◽  
Kyoung Hag Lee ◽  
Jung Sim Jun

Abstract Cervical cancer remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among women globally; yet cancer burden is unevenly distributed among racial/ethnic groups. With 12,820 new cases in 2017 in the U.S., cervical cancer is the top cause of death among Indigenous women. Indeed, cervical cancer mortality rates among AI women in South Dakota are five times the national average and 79% higher compared to Whites in that region. This study examined predictive models of utilization of mammograms among Indigenous women adapting Andersen’s behavioral model. Using a sample of 285 Indigenous women residing in South Dakota, nested logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess predisposing (age and marital status), need (personal and family cancer history), and enabling factors (education, monthly household income, mammogram screening awareness, breast cancer knowledge, self-rated health, and cultural practice to breast cancer screening). Results indicated that only 55.5% of participants reported having had a breast cancer screening within the past 2 years, whereas 21.0% never had a mammogram test. After controlling for predisposing and need factors, higher education, greater awareness of mammogram, and higher utilization of traditional Native American approaches were significant predictors of mammogram uptake. The results provide important implications for intervention strategies aimed at improving breast cancer screening and service use among Indigenous women. Educating health professionals and Indigenous community members about the importance of breast cancer screening is highly needed. It is critical to assess a woman’s level of traditional beliefs and practices and its possible influence on screening participation and future screening intention.


2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. E91-E98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulbari Bener ◽  
Gladys Honein ◽  
Anne O. Carter ◽  
Zahra Da'ar ◽  
Campbell Miller ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 096914132110322
Author(s):  
Jack XQ Pang ◽  
James Newsome ◽  
Maggie Sun ◽  
Bonnie Chiang ◽  
Seema Mutti-Packer ◽  
...  

Objectives To compare abnormal call rates (ACR), cancer detection rates (CDR), positive predictive values (PPVs), and annual return to screen recommendations after switching from digital mammography (DM) to digital breast tomosynthesis plus DM (DBT + DM) for breast cancer screening. Setting The Alberta Breast Cancer Screening Program collects screening data from clinics throughout the province of Alberta, Canada. Methods This study retrospectively collected data, between 2015 and 2018, on women aged 40+ who underwent breast cancer screening at two large volume multisite radiology groups to compare metrics one year prior and one year after DBT + DM implementation. Comparisons between modalities were carried out within age groups, within breast density categories, and for initial vs. subsequent screens. Results A total of 125,432 DM and 128,912 DBT + DM screening exams were performed. For women aged 50–74, the DBT + DM group had a higher ACR ( p < 0.01) but lower annual return to screens ( p < 0.01). CDR was higher post-DBT + DM implementation for women with scattered (6.0 per 1000 vs. 4.4 per 1000; p = 0.001) or heterogeneously dense breasts (6.5 per 1000 vs. 4.2 per 1000; p < 0.001). PPV was higher with DBT + DM for all age groups, with women 50–74 having a PPV of 8.3% using DBT + DM vs. 7.1% with DM ( p = 0.009). Conclusion All metrics improved or stayed the same after switching to DBT + DM except for ACR. However, the increase in ACR could be attributed to a trend already occurring prior to the switch. Longer term monitoring is needed to confirm these findings.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1472-1480
Author(s):  
Siva Teja Kakileti ◽  
Himanshu J. Madhu ◽  
Lakshmi Krishnan ◽  
Geetha Manjunath ◽  
Sudhakar Sampangi ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Thermalytix, an artificial intelligence–based computer-aided diagnostics (CADx) engine, to detect breast malignancy by comparing the CADx output with the final diagnosis derived using standard screening modalities. METHODS This multisite observational study included 470 symptomatic and asymptomatic women who presented for a breast health checkup in two centers. Among them, 238 women had symptoms such as breast lump, nipple discharge, or breast pain, and the rest were asymptomatic. All participants underwent a Thermalytix test and one or more standard-of-care tests for breast cancer screening, as recommended by the radiologists. Results from Thermalytix and standard modalities were obtained independently in a blinded fashion for comparison. The ground truth used for analysis (normal or malignant) was the final impression of an expert clinician based on the symptoms and the available reports of standard modalities (mammography, ultrasonography, elastography, biopsy, fine-needle aspiration cytology, and so on). RESULTS For the 470 women, Thermalytix resulted in a sensitivity of 91.02% (symptomatic, 89.85%; asymptomatic, 100%) and specificity of 82.39% (symptomatic, 69.04%; asymptomatic, 92.41%) in detection of breast malignancy. Thermalytix showed an overall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90, with an AUC of 0.82 for symptomatic and 0.98 for asymptomatic women. CONCLUSION High sensitivity and high AUC of Thermalytix in women of all age groups demonstrates the efficacy of the tool for breast cancer screening. Thermalytix, with its automated scoring and image annotations of potential malignancies and vascularity, can assist the clinician in better decision making and improve quality of care in an affordable and radiation-free manner. Thus, we believe Thermalytix is poised to be a promising modality for breast cancer screening.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pınar Erbay Dundar ◽  
Beyhan Cengiz Ozyurt ◽  
Koray Erdurak

Objectives. Community based breast cancer screening has decreased breast cancer mortality in women. This study examined the predictors of nonattendence for invitational breast cancer screening in relation to socioeconomic status in the city of Manisa, in western Turkey.Study Design. For the evaluation of the reasons for refusing to participate in the study, two districts were selected. 446 women aged between 50 and 69 years were selected from the program database by systematic random sampling.Methods. The questionnaire consisted of sociodemographic variables and the adapted version of Champion's Health Belief Model Scale. Univariete and multivariete logistic regression analysis were performed throughout the data analysis.Results. Being from an urban district and being from the western region were the risk factors for not participating in the screening program (, ). A statistical significance was found between mammography-benefit, mammography-barrier and program participation (, ). Although there were many more barriers for not participating in the screening program for the women of the slum district, the attendence rate of the slum district was higher than that of the urban district.Conclusions. Increased attendance may be achieved through enhancement of breast cancer awareness and by reducing some of the modifiable barriers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document