scholarly journals Reducible Nonunited Type II Odontoid Fracture with Atlantoaxial Instability: Outcomes of Two Different Fixation Techniques

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (15) ◽  
pp. 7990
Author(s):  
Torphong Bunmaprasert ◽  
Vorapop Trirattanapikul ◽  
Nantawit Sugandhavesa ◽  
Areerak Phanphaisarn ◽  
Wongthawat Liawrungrueang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Odontoid Fracture ◽  
Atlantoaxial Instability ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Fixation Technique ◽  
Transarticular Screw ◽  
Transarticular Screw Fixation ◽  
Fixation Techniques ◽  
Surgical Fixation

Displaced nonunited type II odontoid fracture can result in atlantoaxial instability, causing delayed cervical myelopathy. Both Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique and Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod segmental fixation technique are effective techniques to provide stability. This study aimed to demonstrate the results of two surgical fixation techniques for the treatment of reducible nonunited type II odontoid fracture with atlantoaxial instability. Medical records of patients with reducible nonunited type II odontoid fracture hospitalized for spinal fusion between April 2007 and April 2018 were reviewed. For each patient, specific surgical fixation, either Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique augmented with supplemental wiring or Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod fixation technique, was performed according to our management protocol. We reported the fusion rate, fusion period, and complications for each technique. Of 21 patients, 10 patients were treated with Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique augmented with supplemental wiring, and 11 were treated with Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod fixation technique. The bony fusion rate was 100% in both groups. The median time to fusion was 69.7 (95%CI 53.1, 86.3) days in Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique and 75.2 (95%CI 51.8, 98.6) days in Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod fixation technique. No severe complications were observed in either group. Displaced reducible, nonunited type II odontoid fracture with cervical myelopathy should be treated by surgery. Both fixation techniques promote bony fusion and provide substantial construct stability.

Biomechanical Comparison of Two Atlantoaxial Arthrodeses in a Cadaveric Spine Model: Transarticular Screw Fixation Versus Screw and Rod Fixation

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. K. Goel ◽  
H. Kuroki ◽  
S. Holekamp ◽  
V. Pitka¨nen ◽  
S. Rengachary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Atlantoaxial Instability ◽  
Transarticular Screw ◽  
Transarticular Screw Fixation ◽  
Risk Of Injury ◽  
Spine Model ◽  
Fixation Techniques ◽  
A New Technique ◽  
Biomechanical Comparison

The causes of atlantoaxial instability include trauma, tumor, congenital malformation, or rheumatoid arthritis. Commonly available fixation techniques to stabilize the atlantoaxial complex are several posterior wiring procedures (Brooks fusion, Gallie fusion), transarticular screw procedure (Magerl technique), either alone or in combination. Wiring procedures are obviously easier to accomplish however these do not provide sufficient immobilization across the atlantoaxial complex1,3,4. On the other hand, although transarticular screw fixation (TSF) affords a much stiffer atlantoaxial arthrodesis than posterior wiring procedures. However, TSF has some drawbacks; for example the injury of vertebral artery. Furthermore, body habitus (obesity or thoracic kyphosis) may prevent from achieving the low angle needed for correct placement of screws between C1 and C2. Recently, a new technique of screw and rod fixation (SRF) that minimizes the risk of injury to the vertebral artery and allows intraoperative reduction has been reported2,6. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability imparted to the C1 and C2 vertebrae by either TSF or SRF technique in a cadaver model.

C1–C2 Transarticular Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability: A 6-year Experience

Neurosurgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regis W. Haid ◽  
Brian R. Subach ◽  
Mark R. McLaughlin ◽  
Gerald E. Rodts ◽  
John B. Wahlig
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Atlantoaxial Instability ◽  
Transarticular Screw ◽  
Transarticular Screw Fixation ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Cervical Incision ◽  
Cervical Orthosis ◽  
Hardware Failures

Abstract OBJECTIVE We review a 6-year, single-center experience using the technique of C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in 75 consecutive operations. METHODS The study group was composed of 43 men and 32 women, with a mean age of 44 years (range, 8–76 yr). Each patient had documented atlantoaxial instability. In 28 patients (37%), atlantoaxial instability was a result of trauma; in 22 patients, (29%), it was a result of rheumatoid arthritis; in 16 patients (21%), it was a result of prior surgery; and in 9 patients (12%), it was a result of congenital abnormalities. All patients underwent stabilization with C1–C2 transfacetal screws and a posterior interspinous construct. Nine patients had unilateral screws placed. Postoperatively, the patients were maintained in a rigid cervical orthosis for a mean of 11 weeks (range, 8–15 wk); five patients were immobilized with halo fixation for a mean of 13 weeks (range, 10–16 wk). The mean follow-up period was 2.4 years (range, 1–5.5 yr). RESULTS Osseous fusion was documented in 72 patients (96%). There were no hardware failures; however, three patients developed pseudarthrosis. Two superficial wound infections (one at the graft site and one at the cervical incision site) required antibiotic therapy. Four patients had transient suboccipital hypesthesia. No instances of an errant screw, dural laceration, or injury to the vertebral artery, spinal cord, or hypoglossal nerve were noted. CONCLUSION C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation supplemented with an interspinous construct yielded a 96% fusion rate, with a low incidence of complications. We attribute our successful outcomes to careful preoperative assessment and meticulous surgical technique.

Anatomical suitability of C1–2 transarticular screw placement in pediatric patients

2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas L. Brockmeyer ◽  
Julie E. York ◽  
Ronald I. Apfelbaum
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Vascular Complications ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Atlantoaxial Instability ◽  
Os Odontoideum ◽  
Transarticular Screw ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Transarticular Screw Fixation ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Craniovertebral instability is a challenging problem in pediatric spinal surgery. Recently, C1–2 transarticular screw fixation has been used to assist in craniovertebral joint stabilization in pediatric patients. Currently there are no available data that define the anatomical suitability of this technique in the pediatric population. The authors report their experience in treating 31 pediatric patients with craniovertebral instability by using C1–2 transarticular screws. Methods. From March 1992 to October 1998, 31 patients who were 16 years of age or younger with atlantooccipital or atlantoaxial instability, or both, were evaluated at our institution. There were 21 boys and 10 girls. Their ages ranged from 4 to 16 years (mean age 10.2 years). The most common causes of instability were os odontoideum (12 patients) and ligamentous laxity (eight patients). Six patients had undergone a total of nine previous attempts at posterior fusion while at outside institutions. All patients underwent extensive preoperative radiological evaluation including fine-slice (1-mm) computerized tomography scanning with multiplanar reconstruction to evaluate the anatomy of the C1–2 joint space. Preoperatively, of the 62 possible C1–2 joint spaces in 31 patients, 55 sides (89%) were considered suitable for transarticular screw placement. In three patients the anatomy was considered unsuitable for bilateral screw placement. In three patients the anatomy was considered inadequate on one side. Fifty-five C1–2 transarticular screws were subsequently placed, and there were no neurological or vascular complications. Conclusions. The authors conclude that C1–2 transarticular screw fixation is technically possible in a large proportion of pediatric patients with craniovertebral instability.

Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation: a review of surgical indications, fusion rate, complications, and lessons learned in 67 pediatric patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne M. Gluf ◽  
Douglas L. Brockmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Os Odontoideum ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Transarticular Screw ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Transarticular Screw Fixation ◽  
Fine Print

Object. In this, the second of two articles regarding C1–2 transarticular screw fixation, the authors discuss their surgical experience in treating patients 16 years of age and younger, detailing the rate of fusion, complication avoidance, and lessons learned in the pediatric population. Methods. The authors retrospectively reviewed 67 consecutive patients (23 girls and 44 boys) younger than 16 years of age in whom at least one C1–2 transarticular screw fixation procedure was performed. A total of 127 transarticular screws were placed in these 67 patients whose mean age at time of surgery was 9 years (range 1.7–16 years). The indications for surgery were trauma in 24 patients, os odontoideum in 22 patients, and congenital anomaly in 17 patients. Forty-four patients underwent atlantoaxial fusion and 23 patients underwent occipitocervical fusion. Two of the 67 patients underwent halo therapy postoperatively. All patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months. In all 67 patients successful fusion was achieved.Complications occurred in seven patients (10.4%), including two vertebral artery injuries. Conclusions. The use of C1–2 transarticular screw fixation, combined with appropriate atlantoaxial and craniovertebral bone/graft constructs, resulted in a 100% fusion rate in a large consecutive series of pediatric patients. The risks of C1–2 transarticular screw fixation can be minimized in this population by undertaking careful patient selection and meticulous preoperative planning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document