scholarly journals Comparison of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion versus Non-Vitamin-K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulation in High-Risk Atrial Fibrillation: An Update

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Shaojie Chen ◽  
K. R. Julian Chun ◽  
Zhiyu Ling ◽  
Shaowen Liu ◽  
Lin Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽  
The Mean

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in preventing thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation (AF). Non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) have an improved safety profile over VKAs; however, evidence regarding their effect on cardiovascular and neurological outcomes relative to LAAO is limited. Up-to-date randomized trials or propensity-score-matched data comparing LAAO vs. NOACs in high-risk patients with AF were pooled in our study. A total of 2849 AF patients (LAAO: 1368, NOACs: 1481, mean age: 75 ± 7.5 yrs, 63.5% male) were enrolled. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.3 ± 1.7, and the mean HAS-BLED score was 3.4 ± 1.2. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. In the LAAO group, the success rate of device implantation was 98.8%. During a mean follow-up of 2 years, as compared with NOACs, LAAO was associated with a significant reduction of ISTH major bleeding (p = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in terms of ischemic stroke (p = 0.61), ischemic stroke/thromboembolism (p = 0.63), ISTH major and clinically relevant minor bleeding (p = 0.73), cardiovascular death (p = 0.63), and all-cause mortality (p = 0.71). There was a trend toward reduction of combined major cardiovascular and neurological endpoints in the LAAO group (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.64–1.11, p = 0.12). In conclusion, for high-risk AF patients, LAAO is associated with a significant reduction of ISTH major bleeding without increased ischemic events, as compared to “contemporary NOACs”. The present data show the superior role of LAAO over NOACs among high-risk AF patients in terms of reduction of major bleeding; however, more randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Long-term outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and left atrial appendage closure in a large UK tertiary centre: 10-year experience

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Briosa E Gala ◽  
MTB Pope ◽  
C Monteiro ◽  
M Leo ◽  
TR Betts
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a well-established stroke prevention strategy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and high risk of bleeding or contra-indication to oral anticoagulation (OAC). Despite encouraging randomised control trial and international registry safety and efficacy data, long-term outcome data remains sparce. Purpose This study sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes in ‘real-world’ AF patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion in a large UK tertiary centre. Methods This retrospective study included all patients that had a LAAO device implanted in our institution from January 2010 to December 2020. Medical notes, electronic patient records, procedural and imaging reports were reviewed. Annual bleeding risk was extrapolated from the Swedish National Cohort study according to CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED score. Results During the study period a total of 225 patients underwent LAAO device implant. Seventy-two percent were male, age 74 ± 8 years, BMI 27 ± 6 kg/m2, CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.4 ± 1.2, HASBLED score 3.2 ± 0.8 and at high risk of stroke (98 ischaemic strokes and 129 haemorrhagic strokes) and bleeding (151 life-threatening bleeding episodes). Three different LAAO devices were used: 136 Watchman, 54 Watchman FLX and 35 Amplatzer Cardiac plugs. Three patients (1.3%) had fatal complications related to the procedure. At discharge, 10% were taking single antiplatelet (ATP), 79% dual-antiplatelet (DAPT), 1.4% OAC, 3.6% ATP and OAC, 3.1% DAPT and OAC, 1.3% were not taking any anti-thrombotic. Nine (4%) patients had device-related thrombus on follow-up transoesophageal echocardiography with no significant difference between devices (5.0%, 2.8% and 6.7% p = 0.8, respectively) and anticoagulation strategy (p = 0.7). Over a total follow-up of 889 patient-years (mean follow-up 3.9 ± 3.7 years), 24 (10.4%) patients died, 55 patients (6.2/100 patient-years) suffered an adverse event, 15 ischaemic strokes (1.7/100 patient-years) and 20 non-procedural major bleeding episodes (2.3/100 patient-years) occurred. Compared to estimated annual stroke and bleeding risk adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED score, our cohort had a 79% and 65% relative risk reduction in ischaemic stroke and major bleeding, respectively. Conclusion In this cohort of "real-world" high-risk patients, major bleeding and thromboembolic rate remained low on long-term follow-up. Abstract Figure 1

Evaluating long-term outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion: the results of a prospective single-center registry

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Maarse ◽  
L Wintgens ◽  
E Aarnink ◽  
M Huijboom ◽  
B Abeln ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Closure ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by an unrestricted grant from Boston Scientific. Boston Scientific was not involved in the design/conduct of the study, data collection/analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript. Background Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion is an emerging alternative to anticoagulation in the prevention for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, especially in patients with a contra-indication for oral anticoagulation therapy. Long-term results on the efficacy and safety of this treatment remain scarce. Methods In this single-center prospective registry, data of all consecutive patients that underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage closure between 2009 and 2019 were collected. Patients with successful left atrial appendage closure (peri-device leakage ≤5mm) and at least one year of follow-up data were analyzed. The occurrence of thrombo-embolic events (ischemic stroke, TIA and systemic embolism), major bleeding events (BARC >2) and anticoagulation use during long-term follow-up were evaluated. Results A total of 192 patients after left atrial appendage occlusion were included (61 % male, age 69.0 ± 8.4 years, CHA2DS2-VASc 4.0[3.0-5.0], HAS-BLED 3.0[2.0-3.25]) with a mean follow-up duration of 5.7 ± 2.8 years (in total 1087 patient-years). During follow-up 36 patients (19%) died. 49 thrombo-embolic complications were observed in 38 patients. The ischemic stroke rate was 1.9 events per 100 patient-years, accounting for a 70% reduction compared to CHA2DS2-VASc predicted rate. Device-related thrombus (DRT) occurred in 5 patients (2.6%), 3 were observed during routine follow-up and were not associated with thrombo-embolic complications. The other 2 DRT were observed in patients presenting with ischemic stroke more than 3 years after device implantation. Furthermore, 38 non-procedural major bleeding complications occurred in 19 patients, resulting in 3.5 events per 100-patients years, accounting for a reduction of 43% compared to estimated bleeding rates under OAC use. At the end of the study 71% of all patients were on single antiplatelet or no antiplatelet/anticoagulation treatment at all. Conclusions During long-term follow-up thrombo-embolic event rates and non-procedural major bleeding rates were consistently low (ischemic stroke rate reduction 70% and non-procedural major bleeding rate reduction 40% compared to predicted rates). These results confirm the efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion. Abstract Figure. Ischemic stroke rates

scholarly journals Short-Term Apixaban for Documented Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in High-Risk Atrial Fibrillation Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

TH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
pp. e351-e353
Author(s):  
Wern Yew Ding ◽  
Gregory Y.H. Lip ◽  
Timothy Fairbairn ◽  
Sukumaran Binukrishnan ◽  
Afshin Khalatbari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Initial Experience with Minimally Invasive Surgical Exclusion of the Left Atrial Appendage with an Epicardial Clip

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan E. Smith ◽  
Jeevan Joseph ◽  
John Morgan ◽  
Saqib Masroor
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Intercostal Space ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Maze Procedure ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
The Mean

Objective Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the primary cardiac abnormality associated with ischemic stroke. Atrial fibrillation affects 2.7 million people with a stroke rate of 3.5% per year. Most of the emboli in patients with nonvalvular AF originate in the left atrial appendage (LAA). Surgical exclusion of the LAA decreases the yearly risk of stroke to 0.7% when combined with a Maze procedure. Traditional oversewing the LAA from inside the left atrium is associated with a significant number of recanalizations of LAA. An alternate technique is epicardial clipping, which has been approved through sternotomy for permanent exclusion of LAA. We present our initial experience of epicardial clipping of the LAA using a minimally invasive approach. Methods Between May 2012 and December 2015, a total of 24 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive, echo-guided epicardial clipping. Indications for the procedure were persistent (n = 12) or paroxysmal (n = 12) AF in patients who could not tolerate full anticoagulation because of a combination of gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 7), hemorrhagic stroke (n = 5), ischemic stroke (n = 5), intramuscular bleeding (n = 3), falls (n = 2), urinary tract bleeding (n = 2), subdural hematoma (n = 1), traumatic aortic intramural hematoma (n = 1), and lifestyle and career practices inconsistent with anticoagulation (n = 1). The clipping was performed through three 5-mm ports in the left seventh intercostal space (n = 22) or a 5-cm incision in the fifth intercostal space (n = 2). Echocardiography was performed to exclude the presence of LAA thrombus and to confirm exclusion of LAA before final deployment of the clip. Results The mean age was 73.6 years. The mean CHA2DS2VASC score was 4.7 and the mean HAS-BLED score was 3.8. The mean postoperative length of stay was 6.4 days. One patient died of stroke-related complications 10 days after successful clipping, and two patients required thoracentesis to drain recurrent pleural effusions. All patients had successful exclusion of LAA defined as residual sac of less than 1 cm. Conclusions Isolated epicardial left atrial clipping is a safe treatment option in high-risk patients with AF. Long-term success in preventing stroke is still to be determined, but short-term results are very encouraging.

scholarly journals Outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion vs. non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wern Yew Ding ◽  
José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca ◽  
Elnara Fazio-Eynullayeva ◽  
Paula Underhill ◽  
Dhiraj Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Suitable Alternative ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Abstract Background The effects of left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion compared to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unknown. Aims We aimed to evaluate the outcomes in patients with AF who received LAA occlusion vs. NOAC therapy. Methods We utilised data from TriNetX which is a global federated health research network currently containing data for 88.5 million patients. ICD-10 codes were employed to identify AF patients treated with either LAA occlusion or NOAC between 1st December 2010 and 17th January 2019. Clinical outcomes of interest were analysed up to 2 years. Results 108,697 patients were included. Patients who underwent LAA occlusion were younger, more likely to be white Caucasian and male, had a greater incidence of comorbidities, and were less likely to be prescribed other cardiovascular medications. Using propensity score matching, the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower among patients who received LAA occlusion compared to NOAC therapy [1.51% vs. 5.60%, RR 0.27 (95% CI 0.14–0.54)], but there were no statistical differences in the composite thrombotic or thromboembolic events [8.17% vs. 7.72%, RR 1.06 (95% CI 0.73–1.53)], ischaemic stroke or TIA [4.69% vs. 5.45%, RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.54–1.38)], venous thromboembolism [1.66% vs. 1.51%, RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.47–2.57)] and intracranial haemorrhage [1.51% vs. 1.51%, RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.42–2.39)]. Conclusion Overall, LAA occlusion might be a suitable alternative to NOAC therapy for stroke prevention in patients with AF. Graphical abstract

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document