scholarly journals Evaluation of 360° Image Projection Formats; Comparing Format Conversion Distortion Using Objective Quality Metrics

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Ikram Hussain ◽  
Oh-Jin Kwon

Currently available 360° cameras normally capture several images covering a scene in all directions around a shooting point. The captured images are spherical in nature and are mapped to a two-dimensional plane using various projection methods. Many projection formats have been proposed for 360° videos. However, standards for a quality assessment of 360° images are limited. In this paper, various projection formats are compared to explore the problem of distortion caused by a mapping operation, which has been a considerable challenge in recent approaches. The performances of various projection formats, including equi-rectangular, equal-area, cylindrical, cube-map, and their modified versions, are evaluated based on the conversion causing the least amount of distortion when the format is changed. The evaluation is conducted using sample images selected based on several attributes that determine the perceptual image quality. The evaluation results based on the objective quality metrics have proved that the hybrid equi-angular cube-map format is the most appropriate solution as a common format in 360° image services for where format conversions are frequently demanded. This study presents findings ranking these formats that are useful for identifying the best image format for a future standard.

Author(s):  
Philippe Hanhart ◽  
Marco V. Bernardo ◽  
Manuela Pereira ◽  
António M. G. Pinheiro ◽  
Touradj Ebrahimi

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
pp. 7470
Author(s):  
Altynay Kadyrova ◽  
Vlado Kitanovski ◽  
Marius Pedersen

Quality assessment is an important aspect in a variety of application areas. In this work, the objective quality assessment of 2.5D prints was performed. The work is done on camera captures under both diffuse (single-shot) and directional (multiple-shot) illumination. Current state-of-the-art 2D full-reference image quality metrics were used to predict the quality of 2.5D prints. The results showed that the selected metrics can detect differences between the prints as well as between a print and its 2D reference image. Moreover, the metrics better detected differences in the multiple-shot set-up captures than in the single-shot set-up ones. Although the results are based on a limited number of images, they show existing metrics’ ability to work with 2.5D prints under limited conditions.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabien Gavant ◽  
Laurent Alacoque ◽  
Antoine Dupret ◽  
Tien Ho-Phuoc ◽  
Dominique David

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document