Conventional Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (cTBNA) and EBUS-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): A Retrospective Study on the Comparison of the Two Methods for Diagnostic Adequacy in Molecular Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-305
Author(s):  
Francesca Signorini ◽  
Martina Panozzi ◽  
Agnese Proietti ◽  
Greta Alì ◽  
Olivia Fanucchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Molecular Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Neoplastic Cells ◽  
Transbronchial Needle Aspiration ◽  
Average Percentage ◽  
High Diagnostic Yield

Introduction: In recent years, there has been a growing development of molecularly targeted therapies for various types of solid tumors—in particular, in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This has required the need for greater quantities of tissue that is able to support ancillary studies, alongside cyto-histological diagnoses for the assessment of molecular targets. Conventional TBNA (cTBNA) and EBUS-guided TBNA (EBUS-TBNA) have shown a high diagnostic yield for malignant mediastinal and/or hilar lymph node enlargement and peribronchial masses; however, few studies have compared these two procedures. We retrospectively compared TBNA patients (EBUS-TBNA and cTBNA) in order to determine the diagnostic yield and material adequacy for subsequent ancillary analyses. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 318 patients with clinical suspicion of lung cancer or with disease recurrence. All of the patients underwent TBNA (either EBUS-TBNA or cTBNA) on enlarged mediastinal and/or hilar lymph nodes and peribronchial masses between January 2017 and June 2021 at the University Hospital of Pisa, Italy. After a definitive diagnosis, molecular analyses and an evaluation of PD-L1 expression were performed in the cases of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and NSCLC, not otherwise specified (NOS). Results: EBUS-TBNA was performed in 199 patients and cTBNA was performed in 119 patients with 374 and 142 lymph nodes, respectively. The overall diagnostic yield for positive diagnoses was 59% (diagnostic rate of 61% in EBUS-TBNA, and 55% in cTBNA). Adenocarcinoma (ADC) was the most frequent diagnosis in both methods. EBUS-TBNA diagnostic adequacy was 72% for molecular analysis, while it was 55.5% for cTBNA, showing a statistical trend (p = 0.08) towards the significance of EBUS. The average percentage of neoplastic cells was also statistically different between the two methods (p = 0.05), reaching 51.19 ± 22.14 in EBUS-TBNA and 45.25 ± 22.84 in cTBNA. With regard to the PD-L1 protein expression, the percentage of positivity was similar in both procedures (86% in EBUS-TBNA, 85% in cTBNA). Conclusions: Conventional TBNA (cTBNA) and EBUS-guided TBNA (EBUS-TBNA) are minimally invasive diagnostic methods that are associated with a high diagnostic yield. However, EBUS-TBNA has an improved diagnostic adequacy for molecular analysis compared to cTBNA, and is associated with a higher average percentage of neoplastic cells.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Yield of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Cytological Smears and Cell Blocks: A Single-Institution Experience

Medicina ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius Žemaitis ◽  
Greta Musteikienė ◽  
Skaidrius Miliauskas ◽  
Darius Pranys ◽  
Raimundas Sakalauskas
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Endobronchial Ultrasound ◽  
Medical Documentation ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

Background and Objective: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a minimally invasive endobronchial technique, which uses ultrasound along with a bronchoscope to visualize the airway wall and structures that are adjacent to it. Indications for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are samplings of mediastinal, hilar lymph nodes, and tumors adjacent to airway walls. EBUS-TBNA has been used in our clinic since 2009. The aim of the study is to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of cytological and histological specimens, and the safety of EBUS-TBNA in an unselected patient population that has been referred to our hospital. Materials and Methods: We have retrospectively analyzed the medical documentation of 215 patients who had EBUS-TBNA performed in our clinic from April 2009 to February 2014. Results: There were 215 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA. A total of 296 lymph nodes were sampled. EBUS-TBNA was diagnostic in 176 (81.9%) cases of cytological, 147 (68.4%) cases of histological, and 191 (88.9%) cases of the combined evaluation. In the lung cancer patients, EBUS-TBNA cytology had a sensitivity of 72.9% and histology of 72.9%, and in the sarcoidosis group, it had a cytology of 55.8% and histology of 64.5%. As all positive cytology and histology specimens were assumed to be true positive, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 100%. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher when cytology and histology specimens were combined, compared with cytology or histology results evaluated separately (p < 0.05) (for lung cancer 84.1% and for sarcoidosis 78.8%). The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA procedures increased significantly over time, with increased experience. There were no complications with EBUS-TBNA in our clinical practice. Conclusions: EBUS-TBNA had a high diagnostic yield and was safe in the diagnosis of lung cancer and sarcoidosis. It was most informative when cytology and histology were combined. The informative value of EBUS-TBNA histology increased with our experience.

scholarly journals Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for lung cancer staging: early experience in Brazil,

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viviane Rossi Figueiredo ◽  
Paulo Francisco Guerreiro Cardoso ◽  
Márcia Jacomelli ◽  
Sérgio Eduardo Demarzo ◽  
Addy Lidvina Mejia Palomino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cancer Staging ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Endobronchial Ultrasound ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

Objective: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive, safe and accurate method for collecting samples from mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. This study focused on the initial results obtained with EBUS-TBNA for lung cancer and lymph node staging at three teaching hospitals in Brazil. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with lung cancer and submitted to EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymph node staging. The EBUS-TBNA procedures, which involved the use of an EBUS scope, an ultrasound processor, and a compatible, disposable 22 G needle, were performed while the patients were under general anesthesia. Results: Between January of 2011 and January of 2014, 149 patients underwent EBUS-TBNA for lymph node staging. The mean age was 66 ± 12 years, and 58% were male. A total of 407 lymph nodes were sampled by EBUS-TBNA. The most common types of lung neoplasm were adenocarcinoma (in 67%) and squamous cell carcinoma (in 24%). For lung cancer staging, EBUS-TBNA was found to have a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 85%. Conclusions: We found EBUS-TBNA to be a safe and accurate method for lymph node staging in lung cancer patients.

scholarly journals Diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal staging in lung cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastián Fernández-Bussy ◽  
Gonzalo Labarca ◽  
Sofia Canals ◽  
Iván Caviedes ◽  
Erik Folch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Mediastinal Lymph Node ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Endobronchial Ultrasound ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Transbronchial Needle Aspiration ◽  
The Mean

OBJECTIVE: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive diagnostic test with a high diagnostic yield for suspicious central pulmonary lesions and for mediastinal lymph node staging. The main objective of this study was to describe the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymph node staging in patients with suspected lung cancer. METHODS: Prospective study of patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis. Patients ≥ 18 years of age were recruited between July of 2010 and August of 2013. We recorded demographic variables, radiological characteristics provided by axial CT of the chest, location of the lesion in the mediastinum as per the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer classification, and definitive diagnostic result (EBUS with a diagnostic biopsy or a definitive diagnostic method). RESULTS: Our analysis included 354 biopsies, from 145 patients. Of those 145 patients, 54.48% were male. The mean age was 63.75 years. The mean lymph node size was 15.03 mm, and 90 lymph nodes were smaller than 10.0 mm. The EBUS-TBNA method showed a sensitivity of 91.17%, a specificity of 100.0%, and a negative predictive value of 92.9%. The most common histological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: EBUS-TBNA is a diagnostic tool that yields satisfactory results in the staging of neoplastic mediastinal lesions.

Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Non-Palpable Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes in Sarcoidosis

1996 ◽  
Vol 37 (3P2) ◽  
pp. 896-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lohela ◽  
T. Tikkakoski ◽  
L. Strengell ◽  
S. Mikkola ◽  
S. Koskinen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Granulomatous Inflammation ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Cytological Evidence ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes

Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to determine the incidence of enlarged supraclavicular lymph nodes by US and the diagnostic yield of US-guided aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Methods: During a 54-month period, all consecutive patients with a clinical suspicion of sarcoidosis underwent supraclavicular US at the Kiljava Hospital, Finland. All patients with enlarged supraclavicular lymph nodes underwent US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the lymph node. Results: Of a total of 250 patients, 27 (10.8%) had enlarged supraclavicular lymph nodes at US. All these were non-palpable at clinical examination. The cytological specimen was quantitatively sufficient in 25 of the 27 cases (93%). In 22 (88%) of these, the cytological diagnosis was granulomatous inflammation suggestive of sarcoidosis. Three aspirates yielded reactive hyperplasia and 2 specimens were insufficient. No complications occurred. The patients were followed for 2–42 months (mean 19 months), and the diagnosis of sarcoidosis was confirmed clinically in all cases. Conclusion: Supraclavicular US detects non-palpable enlarged lymph nodes in 1/10 of the patients with suspected sarcoidosis. In this subgroup of patients, US combined with aspiration cytology may give cytological evidence of granulomatous disease similar to sarcoidosis and more invasive diagnostic methods can be avoided.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration versus cervical mediastinoscopy in lung cancer diagnosis and mediastinal staging: A retrospective comparison study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20066-e20066
Author(s):  
Rong Zhang ◽  
Yuxiang Ma ◽  
Guoliang Xu ◽  
Xiaoyan Gao ◽  
Guangyu Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Endobronchial Ultrasound ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Transbronchial Needle Aspiration ◽  
Lung Cancers ◽  
Mediastinal Staging ◽  
Study Results

e20066 Background: Invasive mediastinal lymph node staging is essential for resectable lung cancers. This retrospective study compares the diagnosis yield of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and cervical mediastinoscopy (CMS). Methods: Consecutive patients were analyzed from Jan 2009 to March 2016. Only pathologically confirmed results were accepted, and systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy (SML) were used as the standard. The disease diagnosis and N stagingaccuracywere compared in this study. Results: 103 EBUS-TBNA patients and 232 CMS patients were included, 1014 mediastinal lymph nodes were biopsied in lung cancer patients. In per case analysis, there was no significant differences between EBUS-TBNA and CMS in disease diagnosis accuracy (89.4% vs. 81.2%, P = 0.097), and no significant difference in N staging accuracy (75.0% vs. 78.3%, P = 0.629). However, EBUS-TBNA had significantly higher disease diagnosis sensitivity than CMS (82.4% vs. 47.6%, P < 0.001). In lymph nodes diagnosis comparison (station #2, #4 and #7), both EBUS-TBNA and CMS showed very high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (94.7% vs. 99.6%, 88.6% vs. 94.8%, 97.2% vs. 100%), however CMS were slightly better. Positive lymph nodes had longer major and minor axes than negative nodes, and the positive rateswere as high as 59.2% in lymph nodes with a minor axis measuring ≥21mm. More complications and injuries were found in patients receiving CMS. Conclusions: For clinically suspected lung cancers, both EBUS-TBNA and CMS are favorable options for invasive mediastinal staging. EBUS-TBNA may be preferred for its higher disease diagnosis sensitivity and fewer complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document