scholarly journals Synergy in Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems at National and Regional Levels: The Triple-Helix Model and the Fourth Industrial Revolution

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loet Leydesdorff
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
Innovation Systems ◽  
Fourth Industrial Revolution ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Triple Helix Model

scholarly journals Synergy in Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems at National and Regional Levels: The Triple Helix Model and the Fourth Industrial Revolution

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loet Leydesdorff
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
Theoretical Terms ◽  
Government Relations ◽  
Fourth Industrial Revolution ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Knowledge Based Economy ◽  
Institutional Model ◽  
Technological Opportunities ◽  
Wealth Generation

Different from national systems of innovation, a knowledge-based economy is grounded in the volatility of discursive knowledge enabling us to specify expectations. Expectations can be improved by testing against observations. Furthermore, expectations can differently be codified; for example, in terms of market perspectives and technological opportunities. The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations provides first a (neo-)institutional model. However, three functions are recombined at the systems level in each instantiation: wealth generation (by industry), novelty production (academia), and legislation and regulation (government). The Triple-Helix synergy indicator enables us to use the institutional arrangements as instantiations of the knowledge-dynamics and thus to assess the generation of options and reduction of uncertainty in information-theoretical terms. The Fourth Industrial Revolution entails the transition to the reflexive entertaining of expectations in terms of models as increasingly the sources of innovations.

scholarly journals Success Factors in Triple Helix Coordination: Small-Medium Sized Enterprises in Western Java

ETIKONOMI ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-248
Author(s):  
Somariah Fitriani ◽  
Sintha Wahjusaputri ◽  
Ahmad Diponegoro
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
Knowledge Based Economy ◽  
Essential Contribution ◽  
Medium Enterprises

Triple helix model is a model of a knowledge-based economy, which collaborates with the university, business, and government sectors to help small and medium enterprises (SMEs) boost their business. The issue is the three actors have not yet synergized optimally in the development of SMEs. Hence, this study was to identify the critical success factors of the triple helix model for SMEs. This study employed a meta-ethnography and factor analysis to obtain components and indicators of the success factors. The result showed that 37 items of critical success factors have good content validity and excellent homogeneity reliability. Based on these success factors, a triple helix model consisting of six stages has developed. It indicates that these critical success factors make an essential contribution to the development and success of SMEs to achieve the goal of the program.JEL Classification: L52, L53

scholarly journals Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future

Triple Helix ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzhuo Cai ◽  
Henry Etzkowitz
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Behavior ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Theoretical Development ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Research Fields ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
The University ◽  
University Industry

The Triple Helix of university-industry-government interactions, highlighting the enhanced role of the university in the transition from industrial to knowledge-based society, has become widespread in innovation and entrepreneurship studies. We analyze classic literature and recent research, shedding light on the theoretical development of a model that has engendered controversy for being simultaneously analytical and normative, theoretical, practical and policy-relevant. We identify lacunae and suggest future analytical trajectories for theoretical development of the Triple Helix model. The explanatory power of Triple Helix has been strengthened by integrating various social science concepts, e.g. Simmel’s triad, Schumpeter’s organizational entrepreneur, institutional logics and social networks, into its framework. As scholars and practitioners from various disciplinary and inter-disciplinary research fields, e.g. artificial intelligence, political theory, sociology, professional ethics, higher education, regional geography and organizational behavior join Triple Helix studies or find their perspectives integrated, new directions appear for Triple Helix research.

The formation and growth of Google: A firm-level triple helix perspective

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annika Steiber ◽  
Sverker Alänge
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Firm Formation ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Changing Roles ◽  
The University ◽  
University Industry

The Triple Helix model of innovation systems is widely diffused. The fundamental idea of the model is that ‘university’ can play an enhanced role in innovation in knowledge-based societies and that the three helices – ‘university’, ‘industry’ and ‘government’ – interact in order to produce innovation and therefore regional and national economic growth. This is, however, only one model among several different systemic approaches for explaining regional differences in innovativeness. While the triple helix model emphasizes the role of the university for regional innovativeness, the other systemic approaches call attention to either industry or government as having the lead role in innovation. Further, the triple helix model is developed and primarily explored from a macro-level perspective and not from a firm-level perspective. Finally, while the theoretical value of triple helix interactions are reasonably confirmed, there are still gaps in the triple helix concept, and the practical value is only just beginning to realize its potential. From a firm-level perspective, the purpose of this article is therefore to test the applicability and practical value of the triple helix model when exploring the formation and growth of firms using the case of Google Inc. Useful when exploring a firm’s formation and growth, the triple helix model forces the exploration to start even before the entrepreneur enters the scene, which provides a more holistic picture of firm formation. The three helices were all found to play important but changing roles in the different phases of firm formation and growth. The Google case contributes further understanding of the nature and historical evolution of interactions between the three helices, thereby filling some gaps in the triple helix concept. The Google case also identifies a number of mechanisms for interaction and the important role of the bridging organizations that connect the helices and contribute to the development of interactions. Finally, the concept of ‘spaces’ proved relevant and useful, although in the perspective of a firm, the concept has a broader meaning and exists on different levels.

Resource-Based Logistics (RBL) and Competitive Advantage

2020 ◽  
pp. 181-194
Author(s):  
Noorliza Karia ◽  
H.M. Emrul Kays
Keyword(s):  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Fast Moving ◽  
Industry 4.0 ◽  
Dynamic Capabilities ◽  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Logistics Industry ◽  
Logistics Service ◽  
Fourth Industrial Revolution ◽  
Knowledge Based

Logistics service is more complex and knowledge-based in the fourth industrial revolution era. Given this significance, this chapter emphasizes the logistics industry and its specific dynamic capabilities, and measures generating the Industry 4.0 by extending the resource-based logistics (RBL) of Noorliza (2011). The chapter has three parts: Logistics in the fourth industrial revolution, RBL theory, and its impacts and Logistics 4.0 models in the fast-moving environment. This explains how logisticians or logistics firms obtain competitive advantages in the fourth industrial revolution era.

What contextual factors shape ‘innovation in innovation’? Integration of insights from the Triple Helix and the institutional logics perspective

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzhuo Cai
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Institutional Logics ◽  
Innovation Systems ◽  
Western Society ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Institutional Settings ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
University Industry ◽  
Innovation Policies

While the Triple Helix relationship between university, industry and government, called ‘innovation in innovation’ by Etzkowitz, has frequently been a key concept guiding national and regional innovation policies around the world, there is an emerging awareness that no one-size-fits-all approach can be used in developing innovation systems. Criticism has been expressed that the conceptualization of the Triple Helix model in the most recent literature pays little attention to contextual effects. The present article seeks to enhance the context sensitivity of the Triple Helix model by integrating it with the insights of institutional logics. More specifically, seven ‘ideal’ institutional logics aligned with ‘ideal’ Triple Helix activities in Western society are identified. These have a potential to be used as a conceptual/benchmarking framework for understanding how institutional settings, particularly institutional logics, influence the development of Triple Helix innovation systems in different national contexts. To verify such a proposition, some alternative Triple Helix models as well as associated institutional logics are compared to the ideal-type, demonstrating that different institutional logics may divert the Triple Helix interactions in other directions. Meanwhile, it is claimed that institutional logics do not necessarily lead to a Triple Helix model but serve only as enabling conditions. To what extent the Triple Helix will be developed depends on innovation policies and on the key actors involved in the innovation process. The framework constructed in this study aims to provide a solid basis from which policymakers, especially those from developing and transition countries, may improve the design of these innovation policies by employing appropriate Triple Helix approaches.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document