scholarly journals Overreaction in the REITs Market: New Evidence from Quantile Autoregression Approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 282
Author(s):  
Geoffrey M. Ngene ◽  
Catherine Anitha Manohar ◽  
Ivan F. Julio

Real estate investment trusts (REITs) provide portfolio diversification and tax benefits, a stable stream of income, and inflation hedging to investors. This study employs a quantile autoregression model to investigate the dependence structures of REITs’ returns across quantiles and return frequencies. This approach permits investigation of the marginal and aggregate effects of the sign and size of returns, business cycles, volatility, and REIT eras on the dependence structure of daily, weekly, and monthly REIT returns. The study documents asymmetric and misaligned dependence patterns. A bad market state is characterized by either positive or weakly negative dependence, while a good market state is generally marked by negative dependence on past returns. The results are consistent with under-reaction to good news in a bad state and overreaction to bad news in a good state. Past negative returns increase and decrease the predictability of REIT returns at lower and upper quantiles, respectively. Extreme positive returns in the lower (upper) quantiles dampen (amplify) autocorrelation of daily, weekly, and monthly REIT returns. The previous day’s REIT returns dampen autoregression more during recession periods than during non-recession periods. The marginal impact of the high volatility of daily returns supports a positive feedback trading strategy. The marginal impact of the Vintage REIT era on monthly return autocorrelation is higher than the New REIT era, suggesting that increased participation of retail and institutional investors improves market efficiency by reducing REITs’ returns predictability. Overall, the evidence supports the time-varying efficiency of the REITs markets and adaptive market hypothesis. The predictability of REIT returns is driven by the state of the market, sign, size, volatility, and frequency of returns. The results have implications for trading strategies, policies for the real estate securitization process, and investment decisions.

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
V. A. ERONIN ◽  
◽  
O. E. EMELYANOV ◽  

The article considers the state, main problems and prospects of development of the real estate market in Russia in modern conditions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 244
Author(s):  
Lei Hsu

<p>COVID-19 has brought disruptions to various industries in China. The real estate industry can’t remain immune from the shock as well, which can be presented by the performance of real estate stocks. This study investigates the effects of COVID-19 on the Chinese real estate stocks. Statistical methods, such as OLS regression, are used to explore the effects of new cases, new deaths, new recoveries, bad and good news about COVID-19 of provinces where the headquarters of the sample companies lie on the daily stock returns as well as the changes of volatilities before and after COVID-19. Event study is employed to discover the effects of important events during COVID-19. Results suggest that positive information about COVID-19 significantly increased daily stock returns of the listed real estate company in that province. Total risk and idiosyncratic risk of real estate stocks have increased significantly since COVID-19, while systematic risk has decreased significantly. Among the crucial events during the pandemic, the lockdown of Wuhan significantly caused negative abnormal returns for real estate stocks.</p>


1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-136
Author(s):  
Elli Kraizberg

The 1986 Tax Reform Act is likely to extend optimal holding periods of depreciable assets until the point in time at which the tax basis is exhausted. Additionally, practitioners in the real estate markets tend to argue that the 1986 Tax Reform calls for a major reduction in depreciation tax benefits. Despite the reduction in benefits, values of depreciable properties may nevertheless rise. This paper analyzes various tax legislations in terms of the effect these legislations have on the optimal trading policy for depreciable assets. The tax code of the 1981 accelerated cost recovery system (ACRS), the 1984 ACRS, and the new 1986 Tax Reform Act are compared.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document