scholarly journals An Impact Mapping Method to Generate Robust Qualitative Evaluation of Community-Based Research Programs for Youth and Adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Olfert ◽  
Rebecca L. Hagedorn ◽  
Jade A. White ◽  
Barbara A. Baker ◽  
Sarah E. Colby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Childhood Obesity ◽  
Obesity Prevention ◽  
Ripple Effect ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Childhood Obesity Prevention ◽  
Prevention Intervention ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Research Programs ◽  
The Impact

: Ripple Effect Mapping (REM) is an evaluation approach that has traditionally been used in community settings to visually map the impact of programming and community interventions. This manuscript utilizes the Community Capitals Framework (CCF) to inform REM and to better highlight the changes and impact between various levels of a community, following a childhood obesity prevention intervention. The addition of in-depth qualitative analyses makes this approach particularly useful for the evaluation of interventions with research–community partnership focus. The objective of this study was to describe a CCF-informed REM approach with detailed protocol, training, and application to the community-based, childhood obesity prevention intervention, iCook 4-H, which targeted youth and adult pairs. This protocol includes the steps required to prepare for REM sessions of, ideally, six youth and adult pairs and an evaluator/note taker(s). REM sessions typically begin with an icebreaker and appreciative inquiry activities that inform the REM mapping process that follows. In-depth qualitative analysis of the notes and map images captured during REM sessions ensure the rigor required for research-related interventions. CCF-informed REM can be used collectively by researchers, community members, and participants as a robust evaluation tool to demonstrate, through visual mapping, the positive effects of community-partnered research programs.

scholarly journals A cluster RCT and process evaluation evaluating the effectiveness of an optimisation intervention to promote parental engagement in a childhood obesity prevention programme: Results of the Optimising Family Engagement in HENRY (OFTEN) trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Bryant ◽  
Wendy Burton ◽  
Michelle Collinson ◽  
Amanda Farrin ◽  
Jane Nixon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Childhood Obesity ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Obesity Prevention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Parental Engagement ◽  
Childhood Obesity Prevention ◽  
Prevention Intervention ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Children’S Centres

Abstract Background Low parental participation reduces the impact and sustainability of public health childhood obesity prevention programmes. Using data from a focused ethnography, we developed a multi-level, theory-based implementation optimisation intervention. The optimisation intervention aimed to support local authorities and children’s centres to adopt behaviours to promote engagement in ‘HENRY (Health Exercise Nutrition for the Really Young)’, a UK community obesity prevention intervention. Methods We evaluated the effectiveness of the optimisation intervention on programme enrolment and completion over a 12 implementation period in a cluster randomised controlled trial. We randomised 20 local government authorities (with 126 children’s centres) to HENRY plus the optimisation intervention or to HENRY alone. Primary outcomes were (1) the proportion of centres enrolling at least eight parents per programme and (2) the proportion of centres with a minimum of 75% of parents attending at least five of eight sessions per programme. Trial analyses adjusted for stratification factors (pre-randomisation implementation of HENRY, local authority size, deprivation) and allowed for cluster design. A parallel mixed-methods process evaluation used qualitative interview data and routine monitoring to explain trial results. Results Neither primary outcome differed significantly between groups; 17.8% of intervention centres and 18.0% of control centres achieved the parent enrolment target (adjusted difference -1.2%; 95%CI: -19.5%, 17.1%); 17.1% of intervention centres and 13.9% of control centres achieved the attendance target (adjusted difference 1.2%; 95%CI: -15.7%, 18.1%). Unexpectedly, the trial coincided with substantial national service restructuring, including centre closures and reduced funds. Some commissioning and management teams stopped or reduced implementation of both HENRY and the optimisation intervention due to competing demands. Thus, at follow up, HENRY programmes were delivered to approximately half the number of parents compared to baseline (n=433 vs. 881). Conclusions During a period in which services were reduced by policies outside the realm of this research, this first definitive trial found no evidence of effectiveness for an implementation optimisation intervention promoting parent engagement in an obesity prevention intervention. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02675699 registered 4th February 2016. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02675699

scholarly journals Supporting healthy lifestyle behaviours in families attending community playgroups: parents’ perceptions of facilitators and barriers

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea B. Fuller ◽  
Rebecca A. Byrne ◽  
Rebecca K. Golley ◽  
Stewart G. Trost
Keyword(s):  
Childhood Obesity ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Obesity Prevention ◽  
Parenting Practices ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Childhood Obesity Prevention ◽  
Prevention Intervention

Abstract Background Establishing healthy nutrition, activity, and sleep behaviours early in life is a key strategy in childhood obesity prevention. Parents are the primary influence on the development and establishment of obesity-related behaviours in young children. There is evidence that autonomy supporting parenting practices are crucial for the development of self-regulation and the internalisation of healthy behaviours in children. It is therefore imperative that parenting practices are targeted as part of an obesity prevention intervention. However, there is limited understanding of barriers and facilitators to parents using autonomy supporting parenting practices with their children aged 0–5 years. Therefore, the aim of the study was to identify barriers and facilitators to using autonomy supporting parenting practices. A secondary aim was to determine parent preferences in respect to an intervention program to be delivered in community playgroups. Methods Parents were recruited through Playgroup Queensland (PGQ), a not-for-profit organisation in Brisbane, Australia, to attend a focus group during their usual playgroup session. The focus group interview guide was designed to promote discussion among the participants in respect to their shared experiences as parents of young children. The focus group transcripts were coded and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Five focus groups with parents (n = 30) were conducted in May 2018. Most of the participants were mothers [1], and the majority (76%) had a child at playgroup aged between 2 and 4 years. Results The support and guidance received from other parents at playgroup was a facilitator to autonomy supporting parenting practices. Barriers included beliefs around the need to use rewards to encourage child eating, beliefs around the need for screens as babysitters, and feeling disempowered to change sleep behaviours. Parents were enthusiastic about a potential program that would leverage off the existing playgroup support networks, but they did not want to be “educated”, or to lose their “playgroup time” to an intervention. Rather they wanted strategies and support to deal with the frustrations of food, screen and sleep parenting. Conclusion These results will be used to inform the development of a childhood obesity prevention intervention to be delivered in a community playgroup setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document