scholarly journals Quantification of Fluid Volume and Distribution in the Paediatric Colon via Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1729
Author(s):  
Jan Goelen ◽  
Benoni Alexander ◽  
Haren Eranga Wijesinghe ◽  
Emily Evans ◽  
Gopal Pawar ◽  
...  

Previous studies have used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantify the fluid in the stomach and small intestine of children, and the stomach, small intestine and colon of adults. This is the first study to quantify fluid volumes and distribution using MRI in the paediatric colon. MRI datasets from 28 fasted (aged 0–15 years) and 18 fluid-fed (aged 10–16 years) paediatric participants were acquired during routine clinical care. A series of 2D- and 3D-based software protocols were used to measure colonic fluid volume and localisation. The paediatric colon contained a mean volume of 22.5 mL ± 41.3 mL fluid, (range 0–167.5 mL, median volume 0.80 mL) in 15.5 ± 17.5 discreet fluid pockets (median 12). The proportion of the fluid pockets larger than 1 mL was 9.6%, which contributed to 94.5% of the total fluid volume observed. No correlation was detected between all-ages and colonic fluid volume, nor was a difference in colonic fluid volumes observed based on sex, fed state or age group based on ICH-classifications. This study quantified fluid volumes within the paediatric colon, and these data will aid and accelerate the development of biorelevant tools to progress paediatric drug development for colon-targeting formulations.

2009 ◽  
Vol 136 (5) ◽  
pp. A-555
Author(s):  
Elad Kaufman ◽  
Mark Fox ◽  
Michael Wyss ◽  
Zsofia Forras-Kaufman ◽  
Reto Treier ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
R. R. Khasanov ◽  
M. Weis ◽  
R. A. Gumerov ◽  
A. A. Gumerov ◽  
L. M. Wessel

Objective. For many years such diagnostic techniques as ultrasonography (U/S), contrast radiography (CR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been successfully applied for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases in children. Despite the long experience with U/S, CR and MRI for small intestine examinations, their diagnostic yield is yet not defined in the context of the short bowel syndrome considering the evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of these methods. In this regard, the purpose of our research was to define the role of each of these methods as a matter of assessing and monitoring patients’ condition as well as diagnosis of complications in patients with short bowel syndrome. Methods. To determine the opportunities of U/S, CR and MRI diagnostics for detection of malconditions in cases of short bowel syndrome we examined patients who had undergone ultrasound, CR and MRI of the intestinal tract as part of preoperative preparation for elongation of small intestine. In order to assess the diagnostic efficacy of aforementioned methods in the context of short bowel syndrome research results were compared with data obtained during surgery. Results. Ultrasonography (U/S) is considered to be the best screening technique for patients with SBS. Contrast radiography (CR) provides an opportunity to research the morphology of small intestine and its transport function quite thoroughly. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a method which allows one to give the best possible estimate of morphology of small intestine. Conclusion. U/S, CR and MRI of abdominal cavity organs are effective methods when it comes to the examination of small intestine in short bowel syndrome; each of these screening techniques has its own strengths and weaknesses. However, a proper combination of these methods should be applied, as it allows one to perform a comprehensive diagnosis of changes in short bowel syndrome and to take appropriate and timely actions regarding further patients’ treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 405-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Griffith ◽  
Radhesh Krishna Lalam

AbstractWhen it comes to examining the brachial plexus, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are complementary investigations. US is well placed for screening most extraforaminal pathologies, whereas MRI is more sensitive and accurate for specific clinical indications. For example, MRI is probably the preferred technique for assessment of trauma because it enables a thorough evaluation of both the intraspinal and extraspinal elements, although US can depict extraforaminal neural injury with a high level of accuracy. Conversely, US is probably the preferred technique for examination of neurologic amyotrophy because a more extensive involvement beyond the brachial plexus is the norm, although MRI is more sensitive than US for evaluating muscle denervation associated with this entity. With this synergy in mind, this review highlights the tips for examining the brachial plexus with US and MRI.


Endoscopy ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
BP McMahon ◽  
JB Frøkjær ◽  
A Bergmann ◽  
DH Liao ◽  
E Steffensen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document